Re: General question: Software vs. hardware

Posted by Steffen Dietzel on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/General-question-Software-vs-hardware-tp7589316p7589332.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear Mika,

it would be really helpful if you could be more specific. What exactly
do you want to compare? There are so many options out there theses days
that it is difficult to guess what you mean.

Having said that, as Avi pointed out, it is generally best to first get
a good image by physical means and then do the computational improvement
like deconvolution. That is true for widefield, confocal and also STED
superresolution.

So, confocal and decon is better than confocal alone or widefield and
decon. Although for some applications widefield and decon might be good
enough.

Steffen


Am 17.03.2019 um 16:17 schrieb Mika Ruonala:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Essentially, this is the question.
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Steffen Dietzel, PD Dr. rer. nat
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Biomedical Center (BMC)
Head of the Core Facility Bioimaging

Großhaderner Straße 9
D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried
Germany

http://www.bioimaging.bmc.med.uni-muenchen.de