http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/SSD-RAID-for-new-wide-field-microscopy-system-tp7589536p7589551.html
these days. If you hooked a pair up in RAID 0 configuration you would have
the fastest practical read/write speed available. This is great for working
with large data sets, but silly for long-term storage. I'd suggest enough
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:37 AM Vergara, Leoncio A. <
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> Post images on
http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> I would second the motion of separating image acquisition from analysis
> and long term storage, especially if you will capture lots of
> multidimensional data sets. You want the acquisition computer to be
> reserved for acquisition and not sequestered for long times by people doing
> image analysis and rendering.
>
> Leoncio A. Vergara MD | Co-Director, Center for Advanced Imaging
> Center for Translational Cancer Research, Institute for Biosciences and
> Technology| Texas A&M University
> Alkek Building | 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd | Houston, TX 77030
> ph: 713.677.7636 | mobile: 409.750.2153 |
[hidden email]
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> MAKING WHAT IF POSSIBLE | whatif.tamhsc.edu
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List <
[hidden email]> On
> Behalf Of Mirco Martino
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 8:38 AM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [CONFOCALMICROSCOPY] SSD-RAID for new wide-field
> microscopy system
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIFaQ&c=cpvmSBWXd8YiHoMtYk_a9E2QIiaEheG3-gfMB16YPq0&r=q_wjVHQNtuyPtW0pWZ8VUASIgPYhLzAdCNyJUslsVzo&m=LCPb84z6izGdGKiaXi-FTSlwkRi9p6Nx3t4xjpHAWtI&s=R-66KwvTznPQH3GzFLg3A2ggV3s-AhgmLHG9PMlGlQs&e=> Post images on
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=cpvmSBWXd8YiHoMtYk_a9E2QIiaEheG3-gfMB16YPq0&r=q_wjVHQNtuyPtW0pWZ8VUASIgPYhLzAdCNyJUslsVzo&m=LCPb84z6izGdGKiaXi-FTSlwkRi9p6Nx3t4xjpHAWtI&s=O2I-QqeeLczV9CB1YYJOp-mgVIOImBdIrs0WtDDdk84&e=> and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi all,
>
> we are buying a new fluorescent microscope wide-field system. The system
> include a workstation with 64GB DDR4 RAM, 11GB of graphic card, 512 gb of
> memory and SSD-RAID of 2TB. There is an option to increase the SSD-RAID to
> 4TB for about 6000$ extra. The system will be use for both fixed materiel
> imaging and for live-imaging with time-laps, z-stack, tiling and
> multi-fluorophores experiments. I was wondering if it is worth to invest
> those extra money for this option or not. This will be the first time we
> will have time-laps experiments, so I don't know what to expect as pictures
> size.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks in advance for your comments and opinions!
>