Re: Lightsheet imaging analysis Workstation Specs

Posted by Francesco Pasqualini on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Lightsheet-imaging-analysis-Workstation-Specs-tp7590391p7590397.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Pavak et al,
This is very interesting and helpful.

Do I understand you correctly that multiple GPU won't help with multiview
deconvolution?

If there is a reference for deconvolution performances as a function of
various hardware options can anyone point it out?

Thanks
Francesco



On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 12:57 AM PAVAK SHAH <[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Niyanta,
>
> What lightsheet instrument and what is the size of your typical dataset? Is
> your processing pipeline primarily for segmentation or multiview
> deconvolution? This will dictate, to a large extent, the kind of memory and
> CPU you need.
>
> An RTX 2080ti or Titan RTX will be competitively performant but much
> cheaper than a Quadro card, which offers no benefits for an image analysis
> workflow unless you're running virtual machines. If your workflow is
> primarily single view deconvolution, multiple GPUs can also be a huge boon
> in terms of processing throughput, especially if individual volumes can fit
> in 11 GB of VRAM since you can fill a large workstation to bursting with
> 2080ti's for the price of 1 Quadro card. Even 2x Titan RTX can be had for
> less than the price of 1x Quadro 6000.
>
> Depending on the specific piece of software, many will not scale
> efficiently to >16 cores and a faster clocked CPU with fewer cores may be
> advantageous. If you can benchmark it on a high core count system, that
> should show whether your pipelines are able to keep that many cores fed
> before running into algorithmic, disk access or memory throughput
> bottlenecks.
>
> Best,
> Pavak
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 1:27 PM Niyanta Kumar <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I plan to get a workstation that can handle confocal and lightsheet data
> > analysis using Imaris and/or Arivis. Lightsheet data clearly has the
> higher
> > bar/needs in terms of specs. Below are the specs I am considering. Can
> you
> > please let me know if you have any recommendations?
> >
> > Lenovo Think Station P920
> > 3.7 GHz CPUs (Intel) 48 cores
> > Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 or 8000
> > 4 X 3 TB of local SSD (multiple drives - one for the OS, one for writing,
> > one for reading)
> > RAM: 500 GB
> > Monitor: dual 1920 x 1200
> > 300 TB NAS via 10 GB ethernet – file sharing
> > Mouse: 3 button wheel
> >
> > Monitor: thinking of a dual Lenovo Think Vision P32u-10 but it doesn’t
> > have a full array LED. Any suggestions? I hear the curved monitors can
> > cause issues with display when sharing screens over Webex etc.
> > Thanks,
> > Niyanta
> >
>