http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Lightsheet-imaging-analysis-Workstation-Specs-tp7590391p7590400.html
(or different segments of the same dataset). I have not kept up as closely
albeit with sub-linear gains in performance. In the case of MVR, my
years) and most users run it on CPU clusters now. I've been meaning to take
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> Post images on
http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Pavak et al,
> This is very interesting and helpful.
>
> Do I understand you correctly that multiple GPU won't help with multiview
> deconvolution?
>
> If there is a reference for deconvolution performances as a function of
> various hardware options can anyone point it out?
>
> Thanks
> Francesco
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 12:57 AM PAVAK SHAH <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> > Post images on
http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > Hi Niyanta,
> >
> > What lightsheet instrument and what is the size of your typical dataset?
> Is
> > your processing pipeline primarily for segmentation or multiview
> > deconvolution? This will dictate, to a large extent, the kind of memory
> and
> > CPU you need.
> >
> > An RTX 2080ti or Titan RTX will be competitively performant but much
> > cheaper than a Quadro card, which offers no benefits for an image
> analysis
> > workflow unless you're running virtual machines. If your workflow is
> > primarily single view deconvolution, multiple GPUs can also be a huge
> boon
> > in terms of processing throughput, especially if individual volumes can
> fit
> > in 11 GB of VRAM since you can fill a large workstation to bursting with
> > 2080ti's for the price of 1 Quadro card. Even 2x Titan RTX can be had for
> > less than the price of 1x Quadro 6000.
> >
> > Depending on the specific piece of software, many will not scale
> > efficiently to >16 cores and a faster clocked CPU with fewer cores may be
> > advantageous. If you can benchmark it on a high core count system, that
> > should show whether your pipelines are able to keep that many cores fed
> > before running into algorithmic, disk access or memory throughput
> > bottlenecks.
> >
> > Best,
> > Pavak
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 1:27 PM Niyanta Kumar <
> >
[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > *****
> > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > >
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> > > Post images on
http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> > posting.
> > > *****
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I plan to get a workstation that can handle confocal and lightsheet
> data
> > > analysis using Imaris and/or Arivis. Lightsheet data clearly has the
> > higher
> > > bar/needs in terms of specs. Below are the specs I am considering. Can
> > you
> > > please let me know if you have any recommendations?
> > >
> > > Lenovo Think Station P920
> > > 3.7 GHz CPUs (Intel) 48 cores
> > > Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 or 8000
> > > 4 X 3 TB of local SSD (multiple drives - one for the OS, one for
> writing,
> > > one for reading)
> > > RAM: 500 GB
> > > Monitor: dual 1920 x 1200
> > > 300 TB NAS via 10 GB ethernet – file sharing
> > > Mouse: 3 button wheel
> > >
> > > Monitor: thinking of a dual Lenovo Think Vision P32u-10 but it doesn’t
> > > have a full array LED. Any suggestions? I hear the curved monitors can
> > > cause issues with display when sharing screens over Webex etc.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Niyanta
> > >
> >
>