http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/advice-with-far-red-probe-to-distinguish-from-mRFP-mCherry-tp7591381p7591384.html
observed significant overlap with mCherry. We typically increase the laser
power for miRFP670 compared to that for CFP, YFP or mCherry. Incubation
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> Post images on
http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
>
>
> A lab is asking us for advice with a far red fluorescent probe. They are
> already using Dapi, GFP, and mCherry or mRFP and want to add a fourth
> probe. They suggested E2-Crimson.
>
> I looked up E2-Crimson on FP Base (a great website) and found that we
> could probably distinguish it well from mCherry by sequential excitations
> and clipping some of the emission spectra if controls showed bleed
> through. However, with a 633 nm laser excitation efficiency would only be
> 40%.
>
> I was thinking something more redshifted would be preferable and found
> miRFP670 which is reported to have 91% excitation efficiency with our
> laser, but only half as bright, so it might be a wash.
>
> Any advice very much appreciated regarding:
> Does anyone have experience with ER2-Crimson &/or miRFP670?
> Is it as simple to separate from mCherry or mRFP as I expect based on the
> reported ex and em data?
> Any other suggestions for far red FPs?
>
> Thank you!!
>
> Michael Cammer, Sr Research Scientist, DART Microscopy Laboratory
> NYU Langone Health, 540 First Avenue, SK2 Microscopy Suite, New York, NY
> 10016
> Office: 646-501-0567 Cell: 914-309-3270
[hidden email]
> <mailto:
[hidden email]>
>
http://nyulmc.org/micros http://microscopynotes.com/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you
> have received this email in error please notify the sender by return email
> and delete the original message. Please note, the recipient should check
> this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
> organization accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this email.
> =================================
>