Watkins, Simon C |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Folks, I am modifying a scanner to incorporate a 370-380nm source to generate DNA breaks. A sort of mega FRAP. There are many diode solutions out there with just the right wavelength, but which to choose? and whats the best power to select? if any of you have tried this successfully could you respond, on or off list. Tx S Simon C. Watkins Ph.D, FRC Path Professor and Vice Chair Cell Biology and Physiology Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging BSTS 225 University of Pittsburgh 3500 Terrace St Pittsburgh PA 15261 412-352-2277 www.cbi.pitt.edu<http://www.cbi.pitt.edu> |
Craig Brideau |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** The transmission properties of most optics tends to drop sharply around 400nm. You will probably lose a lot of power in your lenses. As a result, you probably want to get the highest power you can budget for while still maintaining good noise specs. Craig On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Watkins, Simon C <[hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Folks, I am modifying a scanner to incorporate a 370-380nm source to > generate DNA breaks. A sort of mega FRAP. There are many diode solutions > out there with just the right wavelength, but which to choose? and whats the > best power to select? if any of you have tried this successfully could you > respond, on or off list. > Tx > S > > Simon C. Watkins Ph.D, FRC Path > Professor and Vice Chair Cell Biology and Physiology > Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging > BSTS 225 > University of Pittsburgh > 3500 Terrace St > Pittsburgh PA 15261 > 412-352-2277 > www.cbi.pitt.edu<http://www.cbi.pitt.edu> > |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** We have provided LED sources to end users from www.prizmatix.com They make a 365 LED direct or fiber (3mmm liquid light guide) coupled that has 50mW plus output (distal; 10nm bw). The driver has 1 microsecond off-on-off and can be modulated/pulsed at rates up to 30 kHz. This is better than Thorlabs, I believe. The LED's used are actually fairly broadband. I think you get more power as you move up towards 370. We have used these for exciting Lanthanides and performing TRFM. If is a macro (well plate or similar sized target), look at www.innovationsinoptics.com 1240B-100 UV illuminator. We have one on order for 365-370 excitation. Mike www.stanfordphotonics.com Michael Buchin Stanford Photonics, Inc. Ph: 650-969-5991 -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Craig Brideau Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:57 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: 370nm sources for DNA damage ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** The transmission properties of most optics tends to drop sharply around 400nm. You will probably lose a lot of power in your lenses. As a result, you probably want to get the highest power you can budget for while still maintaining good noise specs. Craig On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Watkins, Simon C <[hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Folks, I am modifying a scanner to incorporate a 370-380nm source to > generate DNA breaks. A sort of mega FRAP. There are many diode solutions > out there with just the right wavelength, but which to choose? and whats the > best power to select? if any of you have tried this successfully could you > respond, on or off list. > Tx > S > > Simon C. Watkins Ph.D, FRC Path > Professor and Vice Chair Cell Biology and Physiology > Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging > BSTS 225 > University of Pittsburgh > 3500 Terrace St > Pittsburgh PA 15261 > 412-352-2277 > www.cbi.pitt.edu<http://www.cbi.pitt.edu> > |
Tim O'Brien Sr. |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** If any of your colleagues are interested in applying forces, and assessing the effects of forces, on cells or other biologic materials, please let them know about our annual workshop upcoming in May. Among the cool features of the workshop are the wide range of techniques used, the morning lectures, and the hands-on labs in the afternoon. More information below. Thanks! Tim O'Brien UNC Chapel Hill Carolina Workshop on Force Measurements and Manipulation in Biological Microscopy UNC Chapel Hill; May 10-13, 2011. Our workshop is hosted by CISMM, our NIH resource (Computer Integrated Systems for Microscopy and Manipulation; CISMM.org). It consists of morning lectures followed by hands-on experiments that use micron-scale application of forces on live specimens. The morning discussions provide a framework for understanding and analyzing forces on the micro and nanoscales, and serve as an introduction to the afternoon's experiments. The afternoon sessions are hands-on laboratories where you perform force measurements such as stretching fibrin fibers and pulling on living cells. Experiments use laser tweezers, an integrated atomic force microscopy/optical microscopy system, and 3D magnetic systems integrated with a fluorescence confocal microscope. We also include an introduction to microfluidics. Finally, participants spend a half day learning to use some of the many free software packages available from our resource that facilitate the analysis and visualization of 3D images and forces in biological systems. Registration is limited to 18, so you have lots of hands-on time with the microscopes. The $775 fee includes all supplies, light breakfasts, snacks and a conference dinner. (A limited number of scholarships may be available for NIH supported researchers.)Please contact Cassandra Houston: Ph:(919) 962-4057; Email: [hidden email]. -- E. Tim O'Brien Sr. Computer Integrated Systems for Microscopy and Manipulation UNC Physics and Astronomy UNC Chapel Hill, NC 27599 919 843 2798 |
George McNamara |
In reply to this post by Watkins, Simon C
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Simon, What about using one of your multiphoton lasers, tune it to ~750 nm, and use an SHG crystal to convert as much power as possible to ~375 nm. This would also let you tune up to over 800 nm (peak power) to a wavelength that is above the absorbance peak of whatever is in there absorbing ~375 nm - at some wavelength (and power) efficiency of generating breaks will reduce to near zero. I also believe someone has published a comparison of UV vs 2-photon DNA breaks. George On 2/9/2011 10:17 AM, Watkins, Simon C wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Folks, I am modifying a scanner to incorporate a 370-380nm source to generate DNA breaks. A sort of mega FRAP. There are many diode solutions out there with just the right wavelength, but which to choose? and whats the best power to select? if any of you have tried this successfully could you respond, on or off list. > Tx > S > > Simon C. Watkins Ph.D, FRC Path > Professor and Vice Chair Cell Biology and Physiology > Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging > BSTS 225 > University of Pittsburgh > 3500 Terrace St > Pittsburgh PA 15261 > 412-352-2277 > www.cbi.pitt.edu<http://www.cbi.pitt.edu> > > -- George McNamara, PhD Analytical Imaging Core Facility University of Miami |
Steve Bagley |
In reply to this post by Watkins, Simon C
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Simon I have recently mounted a Teem Photonics 4mW 355nm laser to the UV port of our spinning disk system http://www.photonicsolutions.co.uk/datasheets/teem/TMuchipsealeduv.pdf This has been suitable for inducing DNA damage in a variety of cell types. The work has recently been published here: Molecular Cell, Volume 41, Issue 1, 7 January 2011, Pages 46-55 http://goo.gl/uuWr6 If any details about the equipment and setup will help please do not hestitate to contact me Steve Steve Bagley Head of Imaging Imaging Facility Paterson Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Research UK University of Manchester Wilmslow Road Manchester M20 9BX UK www.paterson.man.ac.uk -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Simon C [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 09 February 2011 15:18 Subject: 370nm sources for DNA damage ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Folks, I am modifying a scanner to incorporate a 370-380nm source to generate DNA breaks. A sort of mega FRAP. There are many diode solutions out there with just the right wavelength, but which to choose? and whats the best power to select? if any of you have tried this successfully could you respond, on or off list. Tx S Simon C. Watkins Ph.D, FRC Path Professor and Vice Chair Cell Biology and Physiology Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging BSTS 225 University of Pittsburgh 3500 Terrace St Pittsburgh PA 15261 412-352-2277 www.cbi.pitt.edu<http://www.cbi.pitt.edu> |
Watkins, Simon C |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi steve. What did the source end up costing you? Simon C Watkins Professor and Vice Chair. Cell Biology Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging University of Pittsburgh BSTS 225, Terrace St. Pittsburgh PA 15261 Tel: 412-352-2277 Http://www.cbi.pitt.edu And sent from iPad hence the typos On Feb 14, 2011, at 4:30 AM, "Steve Bagley" <[hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Hi Simon > > I have recently mounted a Teem Photonics 4mW 355nm laser to the UV port > of our spinning disk system > http://www.photonicsolutions.co.uk/datasheets/teem/TMuchipsealeduv.pdf > > This has been suitable for inducing DNA damage in a variety of cell > types. The work has recently been published here: > Molecular Cell, Volume 41, Issue 1, 7 January 2011, Pages 46-55 > http://goo.gl/uuWr6 > > If any details about the equipment and setup will help please do not > hestitate to contact me > > Steve > > > > Steve Bagley > Head of Imaging > Imaging Facility > Paterson Institute for Cancer Research > Cancer Research UK > University of Manchester > Wilmslow Road > Manchester M20 9BX UK > www.paterson.man.ac.uk > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Watkins, Simon C [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: 09 February 2011 15:18 > Subject: 370nm sources for DNA damage > > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Folks, I am modifying a scanner to incorporate a 370-380nm source to > generate DNA breaks. A sort of mega FRAP. There are many diode > solutions out there with just the right wavelength, but which to choose? > and whats the best power to select? if any of you have tried this > successfully could you respond, on or off list. > Tx > S > > Simon C. Watkins Ph.D, FRC Path > Professor and Vice Chair Cell Biology and Physiology > Professor Immunology Director Center for Biologic Imaging > BSTS 225 > University of Pittsburgh > 3500 Terrace St > Pittsburgh PA 15261 > 412-352-2277 > www.cbi.pitt.edu<http://www.cbi.pitt.edu> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |