Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal As one of the features of the Leica SP5, the SNR seems to be better then in the SP2 due to cooled PMTs. My question: Is it possible to compare or even pool data of fine structures like dendritic spines (volume etc) obtained from both systems - or would you assume the results to be different under the same experimental conditions? Thanks! -- Dr. Tino Jäger Department of Neurophysiology Center for Brain Research Medical University of Vienna Spitalgasse 4, A-1090 Vienna Tel: +43-1-4277-62847 Secr: +43-1-4277-62835 FAX: +43-1-4277-62865 http://www.meduniwien.ac.at |
Nuno Moreno |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Hi. As far as I know the major issue is not cooling but better AMPS. Tino Jäger wrote: > Search the CONFOCAL archive at > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > > As one of the features of the Leica SP5, the SNR seems to be better then > in the SP2 due to cooled PMTs. > My question: Is it possible to compare or even pool data of fine > structures like dendritic spines (volume etc) obtained from both systems > - or would you assume the results to be different under the same > experimental conditions? > Thanks! > |
In reply to this post by Tino Jäger
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Signal to noise is not likely to make results quantitatively different but it could affect accuracy. Wouldn't the best approach be to run the same sample (and protocols) on both systems and compare? Guy -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Tino Jäger Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2008 5:59 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Data comparison: Leica SP2 - SP5 Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal As one of the features of the Leica SP5, the SNR seems to be better then in the SP2 due to cooled PMTs. My question: Is it possible to compare or even pool data of fine structures like dendritic spines (volume etc) obtained from both systems - or would you assume the results to be different under the same experimental conditions? Thanks! -- Dr. Tino Jäger Department of Neurophysiology Center for Brain Research Medical University of Vienna Spitalgasse 4, A-1090 Vienna Tel: +43-1-4277-62847 Secr: +43-1-4277-62835 FAX: +43-1-4277-62865 http://www.meduniwien.ac.at No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1431 - Release Date: 13/05/2008 7:55 PM |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |