Data comparison: Leica SP2 - SP5

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Tino Jäger Tino Jäger
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Data comparison: Leica SP2 - SP5

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

As one of the features of the Leica SP5, the SNR seems to be better then
in the SP2 due to cooled PMTs.
My question: Is it possible to compare or even pool data of fine
structures like dendritic spines (volume etc) obtained from both systems
- or would you assume the results to be different under the same
experimental conditions?
Thanks!

--
Dr. Tino Jäger
Department of Neurophysiology
Center for Brain Research
Medical University of Vienna
Spitalgasse 4, A-1090 Vienna

Tel:  +43-1-4277-62847
Secr: +43-1-4277-62835
FAX:  +43-1-4277-62865

http://www.meduniwien.ac.at
Nuno Moreno Nuno Moreno
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Data comparison: Leica SP2 - SP5

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi. As far as I know the major issue is not cooling but better AMPS.

Tino Jäger wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> As one of the features of the Leica SP5, the SNR seems to be better then
> in the SP2 due to cooled PMTs.
> My question: Is it possible to compare or even pool data of fine
> structures like dendritic spines (volume etc) obtained from both systems
> - or would you assume the results to be different under the same
> experimental conditions?
> Thanks!
>
Guy Cox Guy Cox
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Data comparison: Leica SP2 - SP5

In reply to this post by Tino Jäger
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Signal to noise is not likely to make results quantitatively different
but it could affect accuracy.

Wouldn't the best approach be to run the same sample (and protocols)
on both systems and compare?

                                                 Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Tino Jäger
Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2008 5:59 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Data comparison: Leica SP2 - SP5

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

As one of the features of the Leica SP5, the SNR seems to be better then
in the SP2 due to cooled PMTs.
My question: Is it possible to compare or even pool data of fine
structures like dendritic spines (volume etc) obtained from both systems
- or would you assume the results to be different under the same
experimental conditions?
Thanks!

--
Dr. Tino Jäger
Department of Neurophysiology
Center for Brain Research
Medical University of Vienna
Spitalgasse 4, A-1090 Vienna

Tel:  +43-1-4277-62847
Secr: +43-1-4277-62835
FAX:  +43-1-4277-62865

http://www.meduniwien.ac.at

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1431 - Release Date: 13/05/2008 7:55 PM