*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Dear all, We had an excellent meeting with a Till Photonics delegation. They were very supportive and together with them we could identify and (hopefully) finallly solve the performance problems at our instrument. We are now fully satisfied with the offered solutions to our problems. Best Martin Offterdinger Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria |
Csúcs Gábor |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Dear Martin, It is very nice to hear that you have found a solution for your problem, but it would be very interesting to know what the problem was. Could you share it with us? Thanks Gabor Light Microscopy and Screening Centre ETH Zurich, HPM G41 Schafmattstrasse 18 CH-8093, Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 44 633 6221 Mobile: +41 79 7582158 On 11/14/12 3:57 PM, "Martin Offterdinger" <[hidden email]> wrote: >***** >To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: >http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy >***** > >Dear all, >We had an excellent meeting with a Till Photonics delegation. They were >very >supportive and together with them we could identify and (hopefully) >finallly >solve the performance problems at our instrument. >We are now fully satisfied with the offered solutions to our problems. > > >Best > > >Martin Offterdinger > >Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria |
In reply to this post by offterdi1
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Sure, Gabor. It seems that the choice of the objective is very crucial for the signal-noise ratio of the system. We used to take a 60 x 1.2 NA water immersion lens...in principal good for live cell imaging. The better choice for this system seems to be a 60 x 1.35 NA oil lens, or even better if the sensitivity is a problem (like in our case) a 40 x 1.35 NA oil lens. The details we can now figure out ourselves but in principle the matter is at least very close to a solution. We cannot exclude other kinds of trouble due to the specific sample preparation which is very unusual: Carbon coated coverslips, which are addtionally coated with gelatin (this could also cause some optical problems, but it used to work well in our demo one year ago.); on top of this muscle cells are grown... Best, Martin |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |