*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Dear all. I am interesting in to know if is valid get FLIM images from unstained but fixed tissues. Is possible evaluate some biochemical (FAD or NADH ) information from these images? I already find some works using FLIM in fixed samples (Conklin et al., 2009 Cell Biochem Biophys DOI 10.1007/s12013-009-9046-7; Tadrous et al., 2003 Journal of Pathology DOI 10.1002/path. 1286, etc.). But I have also read that does not make sense to work with FLIM in this kind of samples. I appreciate any imput about this question. Thanks in advance. Javier. Javier F. Adur, Ph.D. Optics and Photonics Research Center (CEPOF) Biophotonic Group - IFGW - UNICAMP - BRASIL |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Dear Javier, As you know, NADH and FAD are metabolic related. After fixing, you will probably see little of them. All the best, Sheng Yuansheng Sun, Ph.D. Keck Center for Cellular Imaging, UVA http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/workshop/workshop2013/index.php On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Javier Adur <[hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > > > > Dear all. > > I am interesting in to know if is valid get FLIM > images from unstained but fixed tissues. Is possible evaluate some > biochemical > (FAD or NADH ) information from these images? I already find some works > using > FLIM in fixed samples (Conklin et al., 2009 Cell Biochem Biophys DOI > 10.1007/s12013-009-9046-7; Tadrous et al., 2003 Journal of Pathology DOI > 10.1002/path. 1286, etc.). But I have also read that does not make sense to > work with FLIM in this kind of samples. > > I appreciate any imput about this question. > > Thanks in advance. > > Javier. > > > > > > > Javier F. Adur, Ph.D. > Optics and Photonics Research Center (CEPOF) > Biophotonic Group - IFGW - UNICAMP - BRASIL > > |
In reply to this post by Javier Adur
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** For small molecules - maybe. Do the experiment, publish (in an open access journal like Alby's latest 3) to let us know. Fluorescent protein-fluorescent protein heteroFRET : no (thanks Ammasi P). As for FP-FP homoFRET (fluorescence anisotropy) to measure actin polymerization - not clear to me, how about a vote by all the FRET experts here on: Vishwasrao HD, Trifilieff P, Kandel ER. In Vivo imaging of the actin polymerization state with two-photon fluorescence anisotropy. Biophys J. 2012 Mar 7;102(5):1204-14. Epub 2012 Mar 6. PubMed PMID: 22404943; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3296026. Sincerely, George On 4/16/2012 10:31 AM, Javier Adur wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > > > > Dear all. > > I am interesting in to know if is valid get FLIM > images from unstained but fixed tissues. Is possible evaluate some biochemical > (FAD or NADH ) information from these images? I already find some works using > FLIM in fixed samples (Conklin et al., 2009 Cell Biochem Biophys DOI > 10.1007/s12013-009-9046-7; Tadrous et al., 2003 Journal of Pathology DOI > 10.1002/path. 1286, etc.). But I have also read that does not make sense to > work with FLIM in this kind of samples. > > I appreciate any imput about this question. > > Thanks in advance. > > Javier. > > > > > > > Javier F. Adur, Ph.D. > Optics and Photonics Research Center (CEPOF) > Biophotonic Group - IFGW - UNICAMP - BRASIL > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |