Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
I have a question in regards to publishing FRET data. Our University
has a Leica SP2 confocal microscope that calculates the FRET percentage
values and I have used this data in publications where experimental and
control values were measured but recently I submitted a publication and
was asked to provide more information regarding this data. A reviewer
asked that FRET traces be shown and more explanation as to the degree
of interaction. I was curious on how others reported this data and what
additional information you also present with your percent FRET values.
Thanks for your assistance, Page -- Page Baluch, Ph.D. Arizona State University/SoLS PO Box 874501 Tempe, Az 85287-4501 480-965-7011 |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Dear Page I worked for Leica for awhile and have a
lot of experience on the SP2, I know there is some variability with the FRET
calculations. With that said, there is probably one of the best FRET guys
I have ever worked with at Leica , his name is Scott Young and he can be
reached in there Exton Pa office (provided he is still with the company but I believe
he is) – he is really good with this, worth a phone call - I think
you can reach him at the leica one call number - Hope this helps – I think given my
experience with working for Leica in the past they will go out of their way to
help you Regards Brian Dr. Brian T. Bennett Chief Scientist - Microscopy 518-523-7025 X202 From: Confocal
Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of D. Page Baluch Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal I have a question in
regards to publishing FRET data. Our University has a Leica SP2 confocal
microscope that calculates the FRET percentage values and I have used this data
in publications where experimental and control values were measured but
recently I submitted a publication and was asked to provide more information regarding
this data. A reviewer asked that FRET traces be shown and more explanation as
to the degree of interaction. I was curious on how others reported this data
and what additional information you also present with your percent FRET values.
|
In reply to this post by Page Baluch
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
I am writing the listserve to request information about personal experience and opinion regarding the Instrumedics CryoJane tape system for preparing cryosections for confocal microscopy analysis.
Specifically,
1. does it do a better job of retaining antigenicity in tissues that contain bone since you do not have to use reagents to decalcify before cutting them?
2. Does it work as nicely as it was shown to in the demonstration at the Neuroscience meeting in San Diego this year?
3. Is it worth the expenditure of money? Apparently it requires a motorized sectioning cryostat to be really effective in cutting through tissue that contains bone or through whole embryos.
4. Other relevant information positive or negative regarding its use for immunofluorescent analyses.
Thanks,
Mary Ann Asson-Batres
Mary Ann Asson-Batres, PhD Associate Professor Department of Biological Sciences Tennessee State University PO Box 1116 (postal mail) Room 313 Harned Hall (courier) 3500 John A Merritt Blvd Nashville, TN 37209
Office 615-963-5779 FAX 615-963-2142
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |