Hello,
I have a user that is going to do FLIM-FRET on our Olympus FV500 system soon and I was wondering if any other people on the list serve have an established (written) protocol for doing either de- constructive acceptor photo-bleaching (using the protocol processor method) or synthesized emission. We added the FRET module a few years ago but no one here ever used it. He is set up to use CFP/YFP. I have told him to do CFP and YFP alone as controls and I think I will teach him the de-constructive method first since as I remember it being easier. I also wondered what analysis program people use for calculating FRET these days- we tend to use ImageJ a lot for analysis so if you have a plugin that works well can you let me know? I appreciate all the advice you can give me, this is user is completely new to microscopes so the more I can provide him with the better. Best, Julia |
Hi Julia
The FRET data analysis software in the Olympus system is based on our algorithm. I think they did a good job in integrating the algorithm in their system. As you know we run a annual FRET workshop during March to train the participants on FRET data acquisition and processing using various microscope systems including wide-field, spinning disk confocal, laser scanning confocal, Spectral imaging, 2photon, lifetime imaging, acceptor photobleaching, etc. You should consider attending the course so that you can train others and the software is free for the participants and it works with imageJ. We also added many functions...it can handle 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit images, time lapse and 3D FRET, etc. We can also add functions depending on the workshop participants request. There is no fee for registration and you can register to keep your spot. You can visit the web site to see the info http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/workshop/index.php Hope this helps ammasi -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of js1719 Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 12:56 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: FRET on FV500 Hello, I have a user that is going to do FLIM-FRET on our Olympus FV500 system soon and I was wondering if any other people on the list serve have an established (written) protocol for doing either de- constructive acceptor photo-bleaching (using the protocol processor method) or synthesized emission. We added the FRET module a few years ago but no one here ever used it. He is set up to use CFP/YFP. I have told him to do CFP and YFP alone as controls and I think I will teach him the de-constructive method first since as I remember it being easier. I also wondered what analysis program people use for calculating FRET these days- we tend to use ImageJ a lot for analysis so if you have a plugin that works well can you let me know? I appreciate all the advice you can give me, this is user is completely new to microscopes so the more I can provide him with the better. Best, Julia Ammasi Periasamy, Ph.D. Director, Keck Center for Cellular Imaging (KCCI) Professor of Biology and Biomedical Engineering Biology, Gilmer Hall (064), McCormick Rd University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22904 Voice: 434-243-7602 (Office); 982-4869 (lab) Fax:434-982-5210; Email:[hidden email] http//:www.kcci.virginia.edu ************************ Workshop on FRET Microscopy, March 3-7, 2009 http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/workshop/workshop2009/index.php ************************* |
In reply to this post by js1719
Hi Julia, We use PixFRET very successfully, see this reference: MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE 68:51–58 (2005)
PixFRET, an ImageJ Plug-in for FRET Calculation That Can Accommodate Variations in Spectral Bleed-throughs JE´ ROˆ ME N. FEIGE,1 DANIEL SAGE,2 WALTER WAHLI,1 BE´ ATRICE DESVERGNE,1 AND LAURENT GELMAN1* and AccPbFRET for acceptor photobleaching: I hope this help,
Zoltan On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:56 PM, js1719 <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello, -- Zoltan Cseresnyes Facility manager, Imaging Suite University of Cambridge, UK |
Jerry Sedgewick-2 |
In reply to this post by Periasamy, Ammasi (ap3t)
Hello All,
I know that some problems have accompanied the transfer of the confocal listserv from the Buffalo location to the University of Minnesota server. Among these are messages sent back to those who are posting regarding duplicate messages, and some messages notify the sender that their message didn't post at all (I'm getting the latter myself). In both cases the messages post, but it does lead to confusion. Just to let you know, I am trying to get some answers from our listserv administrator, along with a solution. Until then, our U of M server is garrulous (to anthropomorphize a computer). Please have patience. Thank you! Jerry Sedgewick --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html --- |
Sam's Mail |
In reply to this post by Periasamy, Ammasi (ap3t)
Imaging Scientist - St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.
Currently, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital has an opening for an Imaging Scientist (Job Number 16704) in the Cellular Imaging Department. The successful candidate would be responsible for assisting faculty, postdoctoral researchers, staff, and collaborators in advance microscopy techniques and methodologies, including laser scanning and spinning disk confocal microscopy, wide-field microscopy, live cell imaging, FRET, FLIM, FCS, FRAP and TIRF, as well as routine maintenance of the instrumentation infrastructure. Requirements: A Bachelor's degree in an appropriate scientific field plus a minimum of ten (10) years (post-degree) of relevant and productive work experience is required OR, A Master's degree in an appropriate scientific field plus a minimum of nine (9) years (post-degree) of relevant and productive work experience is required OR, A PhD in an appropriate scientific field plus five (5) years (post-degree) of relevant and productive work experience is required. To apply please visit our Web site http://www.stjude.org/jobs St. Jude Children's Research Hospital is an Equal Opportunity Employer. -- Samuel A. Connell Director of Light Microscopy Cell & Tissue Imaging Center St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 262 Danny Thomas Place Memphis, TN 38105-3678 Office (901) 495-2536 Cell (901) 603-3162 [hidden email] |
Christian-103 |
In reply to this post by Jerry Sedgewick-2
I have always received that error that emails were duplicates or not going through, and then they'd post just a few minutes later. This was BEFORE the move, so could it just be a list-serv software error based on where the emails are coming from (Yahoo in this case)?
|
I've always had the same problem on the old server as well; it's not really a problem once you realise that you just have to wait a bit and ignore the rejection message. I'm sending my messages from gmail.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Christian <[hidden email]> wrote:
I have always received that error that emails were duplicates or not going through, and then they'd post just a few minutes later. This was BEFORE the move, so could it just be a list-serv software error based on where the emails are coming from (Yahoo in this case)? -- Zoltan Cseresnyes Facility manager, Imaging Suite University of Cambridge, UK |
In reply to this post by Christian-103
Hi,
does anyone have experience with the high content screening system OPERA prom Perkin Elmer or scan^r from Olympus? Is there any other HCS system you can suggest (high end objective & cam are necessary)? Thanks for your help, Tino |
Molecular Devices Image Express Micro and Ultra have nice features, Meta runs and performs data analysis. Nice application modules.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Jäger Tino <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, -- Mike Mathews Spectrofuge Corporation 919-361-2197 Office 919-423-1131 Cell [hidden email] www.Spectrofuge.com |
In reply to this post by Tino Jäger
- Tino, John Comley also published a market survey of HCS instruments. I can't find the URL, but I will send a pdf to your personal email address. Also, on volume of Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol 356), and one of Methods in Enzymology (Vol 14, 2006) are devoted to HCS. Might be worth having a look at them. This might give you some ideas of teh different factors to consider, depending on your own needs... Julio. -- Julio Vazquez Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA 98109-1024 == On Oct 16, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Jäger Tino wrote:
|
Bowman, Doug |
Dear colleagues, We have an opening for an Imaging
Scientist position to support our drug discovery efforts at Millennium
Pharmaceuticals in http://www.millennium.com/careers/index.asp and go to SEARCH FOR JOBS. The title
and requisition number is listed below. Regards, Doug Douglas Bowman Millennium Pharmaceuticals
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. |
In reply to this post by Tino Jäger
Dear Tino,
I think the idea of Julio Vazquez about forming a clear idea about your needs is excellent. Nevertheless as we have tested (and use) a number of screening microscopes I can still give you some hints. There are 2 basic questions: What does high NA means for you? (Many systems work with a 0.95 - or similar air objective). The camera question is "easier" - almost all systems use a camera equipped with the same Sony interline chip (same QE). What type of screens do you want to perform: really high throughput (you need a plate loader), or just single plates? In this second case you don't really need a specific screening system - you can easily do it also with a "normal" motorized microscope equipped with a motorized X-Y stage (and the necessary software). But to give also a more useful answer, I'm aware of the following companies offering a screening microscope with a high NA air objective (of course in many cases you can use them also with an oil-objective). BD Olympus Biosystems PerkinElmer (= Evotec Opera) Molecular Devices GE Healthcare I've never seen a system using an "automated" oil-immersion system. The Opera has a nice water-immersion system, and as far as I know, Olympus is also wroking on something similar. Leica has also developed a water immersion system for their Matrix software - with which you make a screening microscope from your Leca confocal (SP5). Cheers Gabor -- Gabor Csucs Light Microscopy Centre, ETH Zurich Schafmattstrasse 18, HPM F16 CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland Web: www.lmc.ethz.ch Phone: +41 44 633 6221 Fax: +41 44 632 1298 e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Tino Jäger
Hi Tino,
The Opera is a very nice system. The high NA not only gives you higher resolution but also shorter exposures which is not to be underestimated for HCS. One of our screens quantified changes in yeast organelle morphology. We've a couple of images from our Opera on our website: http://www.macbiophotonics.ca/opera2.htm Feel free to email me off list for more details. Regards, Tony Tony J. Collins, Ph.D. McMaster Biophotonics Facility Dept. Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences HSC 4H21A McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5 [hidden email] www.macbiophotonics.ca > -----Original Message----- > From: Confocal Microscopy List > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jäger Tino > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:05 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [CONFOCALMICROSCOPY] High Content Screening > > Hi, > > does anyone have experience with the high content screening system > OPERA > prom Perkin Elmer or scan^r from Olympus? > > Is there any other HCS system you can suggest (high end objective & cam > are necessary)? > > Thanks for your help, > > Tino |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |