How to choose journal for not popular topic

[Sergey Tauger]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear list members,
I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
Best,
Sergey

[mmodel]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Sergey,

I would send the abstract to several microscopy journals and ask if they are interested
Good luck!

Mike

P.S. You are not unknown, you are well known to the Confocal List...

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Sergey Tauger
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 12:51 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: How to choose journal for not popular topic

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear list members,
I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
Best,
Sergey

[Tobias Baskin]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Sergey,
             I can also suggest PLoS One. This journal does not use
'importance' or 'novelty' as a criterion for acceptance. Just validity
(i.e., did you do the right controls, etc.). They publish papers in all
areas of sceince. And these days since most people find things by
searching digitally rather than flipping thru the pages of their
favorite journals, probably the visiblity is fine. Just a suggestion
(full disclosure--I am handling editor for them -- but they don't pay me!).

     Tobias

On 8/8/18 12:51 PM, Sergey Tauger wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Dear list members,
> I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
> Best,
> Sergey
>

--
       __    ___   ^    ___   ___   Tobias I. Baskin
      /  \  /     / \  /      \      Professor
     /   / /     /   \ \       \      Biology Department
    / __/ /__   /___  \ \       \__    University of Mass.
   /     /     /       \ \       \      611 N. Pleasant St.
  /     /     /         \ \       \      Amherst, Massachusetts
/     /___  /           \ \___/   \_____ USA  413-545-1533
   www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin                      BLOG: blogs.umass.edu/baskin/

[John Oreopoulos]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

How about Microscopy Today?

John Oreopoulos

> On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Tobias Baskin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Sergey,
>             I can also suggest PLoS One. This journal does not use 'importance' or 'novelty' as a criterion for acceptance. Just validity (i.e., did you do the right controls, etc.). They publish papers in all areas of sceince. And these days since most people find things by searching digitally rather than flipping thru the pages of their favorite journals, probably the visiblity is fine. Just a suggestion (full disclosure--I am handling editor for them -- but they don't pay me!).
>
>     Tobias
>
>> On 8/8/18 12:51 PM, Sergey Tauger wrote:
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>> *****
>>
>> Dear list members,
>> I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
>> Best,
>> Sergey
>
> --
>      __    ___   ^    ___   ___   Tobias I. Baskin
>     /  \  /     / \  /      \      Professor
>    /   / /     /   \ \       \      Biology Department
>   / __/ /__   /___  \ \       \__    University of Mass.
>  /     /     /       \ \       \      611 N. Pleasant St.
> /     /     /         \ \       \      Amherst, Massachusetts
> /     /___  /           \ \___/   \_____ USA  413-545-1533
>  www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin                      BLOG: blogs.umass.edu/baskin/

[Sergey Tauger]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

John, it's interesting to read, but I'm a bit embarrassed it is not peer-reviewed.

08.08.2018, 22:11, "John Oreopoulos" <[hidden email]>:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> How about Microscopy Today?
>
> John Oreopoulos
>
>>  On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Tobias Baskin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>  *****
>>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>  http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>  Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>>  *****
>>
>>  Sergey,
>>              I can also suggest PLoS One. This journal does not use 'importance' or 'novelty' as a criterion for acceptance. Just validity (i.e., did you do the right controls, etc.). They publish papers in all areas of sceince. And these days since most people find things by searching digitally rather than flipping thru the pages of their favorite journals, probably the visiblity is fine. Just a suggestion (full disclosure--I am handling editor for them -- but they don't pay me!).
>>
>>      Tobias
>>
>>>  On 8/8/18 12:51 PM, Sergey Tauger wrote:
>>>  *****
>>>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>>  http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>>  Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>>>  *****
>>>
>>>  Dear list members,
>>>  I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
>>>  Best,
>>>  Sergey
>>
>>  --
>>       __ ___ ^ ___ ___ Tobias I. Baskin
>>      / \ / / \ / \ Professor
>>     / / / / \ \ \ Biology Department
>>    / __/ /__ /___ \ \ \__ University of Mass.
>>   / / / \ \ \ 611 N. Pleasant St.
>>  / / / \ \ \ Amherst, Massachusetts
>>  / /___ / \ \___/ \_____ USA 413-545-1533
>>   www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin BLOG: blogs.umass.edu/baskin/

[Rosemary.White]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Sergey,



I could also suggest Microscopy and Microanalysis - this covers a wide range of imaging techniques and applications from the well-established to the new. As one of the editors, I can reveal that many of the authors are not known to me (and most likely I am not known to them!), although they may be well known in their fields.



cheers,

Rosemary

Dr Rosemary White
CSIRO Black Mountain
GPO Box 1700
Canberra, ACT 2601
Australia
Adjunct Prof, EH Graham Centre, CSU
& Research School of Biology, ANU

T 61 2 6246 5475

E [hidden email]



On 9/8/18, 2:51 am, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Sergey Tauger" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:



    *****

    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:

    http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy

    Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.

    *****



    Dear list members,

    I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?

    Best,

    Sergey

[John Oreopoulos]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hmm... Didn't know that journal wasn't peer-reviewed. Surprising.

Okay, how about Microscopy Research and Technique?

Or Journal of Biomedical Optics, Biotechniques, Journal of Microscopy, Nature Protocols, Scientific Reports, Microscopy and Microanalysis - the usual suspects.

John Oreopoulos

> On Aug 8, 2018, at 5:27 PM, "S.Tauger" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> John, it's interesting to read, but I'm a bit embarrassed it is not peer-reviewed.
>
> 08.08.2018, 22:11, "John Oreopoulos" <[hidden email]>:
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>> *****
>>
>> How about Microscopy Today?
>>
>> John Oreopoulos
>>
>>>  On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Tobias Baskin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  *****
>>>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>>  http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>>  Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>>>  *****
>>>
>>>  Sergey,
>>>              I can also suggest PLoS One. This journal does not use 'importance' or 'novelty' as a criterion for acceptance. Just validity (i.e., did you do the right controls, etc.). They publish papers in all areas of sceince. And these days since most people find things by searching digitally rather than flipping thru the pages of their favorite journals, probably the visiblity is fine. Just a suggestion (full disclosure--I am handling editor for them -- but they don't pay me!).
>>>
>>>      Tobias
>>>
>>>>  On 8/8/18 12:51 PM, Sergey Tauger wrote:
>>>>  *****
>>>>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>>>  http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>>>  Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>>>>  *****
>>>>
>>>>  Dear list members,
>>>>  I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
>>>>  Best,
>>>>  Sergey
>>>
>>>  --
>>>       __ ___ ^ ___ ___ Tobias I. Baskin
>>>      / \ / / \ / \ Professor
>>>     / / / / \ \ \ Biology Department
>>>    / __/ /__ /___ \ \ \__ University of Mass.
>>>   / / / \ \ \ 611 N. Pleasant St.
>>>  / / / \ \ \ Amherst, Massachusetts
>>>  / /___ / \ \___/ \_____ USA 413-545-1533
>>>   www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin BLOG: blogs.umass.edu/baskin/

[Vladimir Ghukasyan-2]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

I could also add Review of Scientific Instruments.

Good luck with the publication, Sergey!

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 6:22 PM John Oreopoulos <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hmm... Didn't know that journal wasn't peer-reviewed. Surprising.
>
> Okay, how about Microscopy Research and Technique?
>
> Or Journal of Biomedical Optics, Biotechniques, Journal of Microscopy,
> Nature Protocols, Scientific Reports, Microscopy and Microanalysis - the
> usual suspects.
>
> John Oreopoulos
>
> > On Aug 8, 2018, at 5:27 PM, "S.Tauger" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > John, it's interesting to read, but I'm a bit embarrassed it is not
> peer-reviewed.
> >
> > 08.08.2018, 22:11, "John Oreopoulos" <[hidden email]>:
> >> *****
> >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> >> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> >> *****
> >>
> >> How about Microscopy Today?
> >>
> >> John Oreopoulos
> >>
> >>>  On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Tobias Baskin <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  *****
> >>>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >>>  http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> >>>  Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> >>>  *****
> >>>
> >>>  Sergey,
> >>>              I can also suggest PLoS One. This journal does not use
> 'importance' or 'novelty' as a criterion for acceptance. Just validity
> (i.e., did you do the right controls, etc.). They publish papers in all
> areas of sceince. And these days since most people find things by searching
> digitally rather than flipping thru the pages of their favorite journals,
> probably the visiblity is fine. Just a suggestion (full disclosure--I am
> handling editor for them -- but they don't pay me!).
> >>>
> >>>      Tobias
> >>>
> >>>>  On 8/8/18 12:51 PM, Sergey Tauger wrote:
> >>>>  *****
> >>>>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >>>>  http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> >>>>  Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> >>>>  *****
> >>>>
> >>>>  Dear list members,
> >>>>  I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image
> appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of
> NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution.
> Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing
> math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of
> diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per
> Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the
> object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept
> such an old-school article from unknown author?
> >>>>  Best,
> >>>>  Sergey
> >>>
> >>>  --
> >>>       __ ___ ^ ___ ___ Tobias I. Baskin
> >>>      / \ / / \ / \ Professor
> >>>     / / / / \ \ \ Biology Department
> >>>    / __/ /__ /___ \ \ \__ University of Mass.
> >>>   / / / \ \ \ 611 N. Pleasant St.
> >>>  / / / \ \ \ Amherst, Massachusetts
> >>>  / /___ / \ \___/ \_____ USA 413-545-1533
> >>>   www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin BLOG: blogs.umass.edu/baskin/
>

[Sergey Tauger]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Thank you a lot, some journals were new to me.

09.08.2018, 15:56, "Cole, Richard W (HEALTH)" <[hidden email]>:

> Sergey,
>
> As an editor of JBT (ABOUT THE JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR TECHNIQUES; http://jbt.abrf.org/jbt-static/index.html), I would be happy to look at the paper.
>
> Cheers
>
> Rich
>
> Richard Cole
> Research Scientist V
> Director: Advanced Light Microscopy & Image Analysis Core
> Wadsworth Center
>
> Research Assistant Professor
> Dept. of Biomedical Sciences
> School of Public Health State University of New York
>
> 120 New Scotland Avenue, Albany N.Y. 12208
> 518-474-7048 Phone
> 518-408-1730 Fax
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Tauger <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 12:51 PM
> Subject: How to choose journal for not popular topic
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Dear list members,
> I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance, and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article from unknown author?
> Best,
> Sergey

[Andrew York]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

I've had a great experience publishing via GitHub. See here for discussion:
https://twitter.com/AndrewGYork/status/965765089373515776

Some examples here:
https://andrewgyork.github.io/remote_refocus/
https://andrewgyork.github.io/rescan_line_sted/

...and a template here:
https://andrewgyork.github.io/publication_template/

Johannes Hohlbein's lab has used the template for their miCube project:
https://mobile.twitter.com/HohlbeinLab/status/1007242428699553792

I personally love the approach; it really highlights the insanity and
perverse incentives of our publishing system when you have an alternative.

I expect this post to raise questions; note that many excellent questions
are asked and answered in the first Twitter thread I posted.


On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:35 PM, S.Tauger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Thank you a lot, some journals were new to me.
>
> 09.08.2018, 15:56, "Cole, Richard W (HEALTH)" <[hidden email]
> >:
> > Sergey,
> >
> > As an editor of JBT (ABOUT THE JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR TECHNIQUES;
> http://jbt.abrf.org/jbt-static/index.html), I would be happy to look at
> the paper.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > Richard Cole
> > Research Scientist V
> > Director: Advanced Light Microscopy & Image Analysis Core
> > Wadsworth Center
> >
> > Research Assistant Professor
> > Dept. of Biomedical Sciences
> > School of Public Health State University of New York
> >
> > 120 New Scotland Avenue, Albany N.Y. 12208
> > 518-474-7048 Phone
> > 518-408-1730 Fax
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sergey Tauger <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 12:51 PM
> > Subject: How to choose journal for not popular topic
> >
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > Dear list members,
> > I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance,
> and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and
> magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the
> topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical
> constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and
> microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and
> shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please
> recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article
> from unknown author?
> > Best,
> > Sergey
>

[Alberto Diaspro-2]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****


I like the Andrew’s approach
Best
Alby from wounded Italy





Alberto iPad

> Il giorno 13 ago 2018, alle ore 23:24, Andrew York <[hidden email]> ha scritto:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> I've had a great experience publishing via GitHub. See here for discussion:
> https://twitter.com/AndrewGYork/status/965765089373515776
>
> Some examples here:
> https://andrewgyork.github.io/remote_refocus/
> https://andrewgyork.github.io/rescan_line_sted/
>
> ...and a template here:
> https://andrewgyork.github.io/publication_template/
>
> Johannes Hohlbein's lab has used the template for their miCube project:
> https://mobile.twitter.com/HohlbeinLab/status/1007242428699553792
>
> I personally love the approach; it really highlights the insanity and
> perverse incentives of our publishing system when you have an alternative.
>
> I expect this post to raise questions; note that many excellent questions
> are asked and answered in the first Twitter thread I posted.
>
>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:35 PM, S.Tauger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>> *****
>>
>> Thank you a lot, some journals were new to me.
>>
>> 09.08.2018, 15:56, "Cole, Richard W (HEALTH)" <[hidden email]
>>> :
>>> Sergey,
>>>
>>> As an editor of JBT (ABOUT THE JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR TECHNIQUES;
>> http://jbt.abrf.org/jbt-static/index.html), I would be happy to look at
>> the paper.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Rich
>>>
>>> Richard Cole
>>> Research Scientist V
>>> Director: Advanced Light Microscopy & Image Analysis Core
>>> Wadsworth Center
>>>
>>> Research Assistant Professor
>>> Dept. of Biomedical Sciences
>>> School of Public Health State University of New York
>>>
>>> 120 New Scotland Avenue, Albany N.Y. 12208
>>> 518-474-7048 Phone
>>> 518-408-1730 Fax
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sergey Tauger <[hidden email]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 12:51 PM
>>> Subject: How to choose journal for not popular topic
>>>
>>> *****
>>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
>> posting.
>>> *****
>>>
>>> Dear list members,
>>> I made a research on how sampling by camera influences image appearance,
>> and what is a "good enough" sampling for known combination of NA and
>> magnification to perform morphometry and deconvolution. Surprisingly, the
>> topic was not described explicitly. No soul freezing math, no new optical
>> constructions, no superresolution - just images of diatom algae and
>> microtubules taken with different number of pixels per Airy disk radius and
>> shift/rotation of camera grid with respect to the object. Could you please
>> recommend a microscopy journal that can accept such an old-school article
>> from unknown author?
>>> Best,
>>> Sergey
>>