G. Esteban Fernandez |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hello everyone, I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have two live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I think they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. One microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 degrees, set to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The other microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The strange thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the components work perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be happening, why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the other? The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to the microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the one that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any ideas on this mystery are welcome. Thanks, Esteban |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** I would check the location of the temperature sensor to make sure that it is as close as possible to the stage on the transmitted light arm. I hope that this helps. Kevin L. Ryan Leica Microscopes and Imaging W. Nuhsbaum Inc. Shaker Heights, Ohio 1-800-368-3368 Cell: 216-401-4079 [hidden email] www.nuhsbaum.com -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of G. Esteban Fernandez Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:02 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Incubator box heating mystery ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hello everyone, I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have two live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I think they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. One microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 degrees, set to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The other microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The strange thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the components work perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be happening, why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the other? The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to the microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the one that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any ideas on this mystery are welcome. Thanks, Esteban |
Michael Schell |
In reply to this post by G. Esteban Fernandez
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Esteban, We use the same box as you do, mounted on an Axiovert 200M. If you open the doors and cause the temperature to drop, then close the doors again, the temperature overshoots to about 39 degrees. Then it gradually cools back to 37. Once it reaches 37, it will remain that way for a week if you don't open the doors. I attribute the overshoot to temperature gradients inside the box, and I suspect that placement of the sensor matters. Have you tried moving the sensor to different locations i the box, and is the sensor placed differently on the two kinds of microscope you use? Michael Michael J. Schell, Ph.D., CIV, USUHS Assist. Professor Dept. of Pharmacology Uniformed Services University 4301 Jones Bridge Rd. Bethesda, MD 20814-3220 tel: (301) 295-3249 [hidden email] >>> "G. Esteban Fernandez" 07/27/11 3:02 PM >>> ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hello everyone, I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have two live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I think they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. One microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 degrees, set to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The other microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The strange thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the components work perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be happening, why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the other? The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to the microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the one that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any ideas on this mystery are welcome. Thanks, Esteban Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: None Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: None |
Kristine Willis |
In reply to this post by G. Esteban Fernandez
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** What is the ambient temperature? I've seen incubators that would not hold temp (37) because the room they were in was too warm (adjacent to the autoclaves). Kristine Willis, Ph.D. Assistant Research Professor Department of Biology, Reiss 406 Georgetown University 37th & O Sts. NW Washington, D.C., 20057 202-687-5513 |
G. Esteban Fernandez |
In reply to this post by G. Esteban Fernandez
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Thanks, everyone, for your advice. The temperature sensor is where the manufacturer recommends, just behind the stage next to the transmitted light arm as Kevin Ryan suggested. I've also tried other locations for good measure, to no avail. Sounds like temperature of the room is a likely culprit. Though it doesn't feel significantly warmer than the room where I get good temp. control I'll check it more precisely. Thanks again, Esteban |
Zac Arrac Atelaz |
In reply to this post by G. Esteban Fernandez
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Esteban: Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system in the non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain working as the trial you make the way around. If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the one we have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it is the size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your sample, the cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open doors, or change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in temperature observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h period. In such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont want to let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted changes, by the way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. I hope this helps a little. Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > From: [hidden email] > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > To: [hidden email] > > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Hello everyone, > > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have two > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I think > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. One > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 degrees, set > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The other > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The strange > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the components work > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be happening, > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the > other? > > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to the > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the one > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any ideas > on this mystery are welcome. > > Thanks, > Esteban |
Craig Brideau |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to continuously record temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed to prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building contractor to install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I recommend that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. The loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from the computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around the room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, etc. Craig On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email]>wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > > Esteban: > > Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the > system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system in the > non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain working as > the trial you make the way around. > > If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the one we > have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it is the > size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your sample, the > cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a > temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open doors, or > change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in temperature > observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h period. In > such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont want to > let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted changes, by the > way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. > > I hope this helps a little. > > Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > > > > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > > From: [hidden email] > > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > > To: [hidden email] > > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have two > > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I think > > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. > One > > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 degrees, > set > > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported > > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The > other > > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The strange > > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well > > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the > > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the components > work > > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be happening, > > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the > > other? > > > > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to the > > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the one > > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate > > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any > ideas > > on this mystery are welcome. > > > > Thanks, > > Esteban > > |
Graham Wright |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** I agree with Craig that the temperature and humidity loggers give you a real insight into what's going on with the aircon in your rooms (particularly over the weekends in our case). I'd be interested though in what you think are reasonable limits for the tolerable fluctuations in both temperature and humidity. We are constantly battling with both in Singapore! Regards, Graham --- Graham Wright, PhD Microscopy Unit Manager Institute of Medical Biology 8A Biomedical Grove, #06-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 E: [hidden email] W: http://www.imb.a-star.edu.sg/imu/ On 29 July 2011 02:51, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite > recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to continuously record > temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in > temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed to > prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building contractor to > install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I recommend > that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. The > loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from the > computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around the > room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, etc. > > Craig > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email]>wrote: > >> ***** >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy >> ***** >> >> >> Esteban: >> >> Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the >> system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system in the >> non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain working as >> the trial you make the way around. >> >> If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the one we >> have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it is the >> size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your sample, the >> cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a >> temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open doors, or >> change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in temperature >> observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h period. In >> such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont want to >> let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted changes, by the >> way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. >> >> I hope this helps a little. >> >> Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela >> >> >> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 >> > From: [hidden email] >> > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery >> > To: [hidden email] >> > >> > ***** >> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: >> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy >> > ***** >> > >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have two >> > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I think >> > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. >> One >> > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 degrees, >> set >> > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported >> > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The >> other >> > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The strange >> > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well >> > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the >> > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the components >> work >> > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be happening, >> > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the >> > other? >> > >> > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to the >> > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the one >> > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate >> > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any >> ideas >> > on this mystery are welcome. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Esteban >> >> > |
Craig Brideau |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** I've received some requests for recommended brands of dataloggers, so I'll post it here rather then send out a bunch of individual emails: A really cheap one is this Lascar Easylogger: http://www.microdaq.com/lascar/humidity/usb-humidity-logger.php A colleague bought a 5-pack of them and scattered them around her labs. You connect them to a computer to charge and program them, then disconnect them and put them into your lab(s) at various places. When you need the temp/humidity log you plug them back into the computer and download the records. They have a higher accuracy version if you need to be more precise: http://www.microdaq.com/lascar/humidity/high-accuracy-temp-rh-logger.php For my own lab I have an MSR 145 IP60 which is very accurate and can operate unattended for many, many months. It has a much larger memory than the Lascar model (2M vs 16k points), but if you are checking your logger frequently and/or logging at long intervals this will be less of an issue. It is very small so you can put it easily in tight places, but it is quite a bit more expensive than the Lascar one. I actually leave it shoved in a Thorlabs XT34 rail that is holding some of the optics on my optical table next to our Ti:Saph. I usually check it a few times a year. http://www.msr.ch/en/product/msr145.php If you need several loggers to cover multiple spots or multiple labs I recommend one of the Lascar 5-packs. If you only want/need a single logger than the MSR one is really nice, especially since it can log for a very long time due to its larger memory, at very short intervals. I leave mine set to record temperature and humidity every half-hour. Some versions of the MSR come with analog inputs as well, so you can patch it into other sensors or status lines on your equipment if you want to monitor something else. Again though, it is much more expensive than the Lascar one so it may be overkill. If you only log once per hour then you'll have nearly 1 year endurance with the Lascar one. I hope this helps! Craig On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Graham Wright < [hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > I agree with Craig that the temperature and humidity loggers give you > a real insight into what's going on with the aircon in your rooms > (particularly over the weekends in our case). I'd be interested though > in what you think are reasonable limits for the tolerable fluctuations > in both temperature and humidity. We are constantly battling with both > in Singapore! > > Regards, > Graham > > --- > Graham Wright, PhD > Microscopy Unit Manager > > Institute of Medical Biology > 8A Biomedical Grove, #06-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 > > E: [hidden email] > W: http://www.imb.a-star.edu.sg/imu/ > > > > On 29 July 2011 02:51, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> wrote: > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite > > recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to continuously > record > > temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in > > temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed to > > prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building contractor > to > > install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I recommend > > that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. The > > loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from the > > computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around the > > room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, etc. > > > > Craig > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email] > >wrote: > > > >> ***** > >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > >> ***** > >> > >> > >> Esteban: > >> > >> Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the > >> system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system in > the > >> non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain working > as > >> the trial you make the way around. > >> > >> If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the one > we > >> have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it is > the > >> size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your sample, > the > >> cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a > >> temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open > doors, or > >> change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in > temperature > >> observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h period. > In > >> such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont want > to > >> let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted changes, by > the > >> way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. > >> > >> I hope this helps a little. > >> > >> Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > >> > >> > >> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > >> > From: [hidden email] > >> > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > >> > To: [hidden email] > >> > > >> > ***** > >> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > >> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > >> > ***** > >> > > >> > Hello everyone, > >> > > >> > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have > two > >> > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I > think > >> > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. > >> One > >> > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 > degrees, > >> set > >> > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported > >> > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The > >> other > >> > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The > strange > >> > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well > >> > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the > >> > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the > components > >> work > >> > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be > happening, > >> > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the > >> > other? > >> > > >> > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to > the > >> > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the > one > >> > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate > >> > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any > >> ideas > >> > on this mystery are welcome. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Esteban > >> > >> > > > |
Craig Brideau |
In reply to this post by Graham Wright
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** It's hard to get, but really you want +/-1 degree C and humidity <35%. This is particularly important if you have a lot of free-space optics. Most fiber-coupled systems can tolerate some temperature change, but free-space beams are guided by steering mirrors. Temperature changes can cause the mirror mounts to flex which misaligns your beam. Additionally, Ti:Saph lasers used in two-photon HATE humidity. We're in Calgary, Canada, which is very, very dry in the winter. We can run our lasers without a dry air or nitrogen purge at 925nm. In the summer though, the humidity gets quite high and purging becomes necessary. The building contractor just finished installing a humidity control system for our lab last week, so we will see how things go. Thus far it seems to be holding the humidity under about 37%. I'll wait a couple weeks and then check my datalogger. @:-) Craig On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Graham Wright < [hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > I agree with Craig that the temperature and humidity loggers give you > a real insight into what's going on with the aircon in your rooms > (particularly over the weekends in our case). I'd be interested though > in what you think are reasonable limits for the tolerable fluctuations > in both temperature and humidity. We are constantly battling with both > in Singapore! > > Regards, > Graham > > --- > Graham Wright, PhD > Microscopy Unit Manager > > Institute of Medical Biology > 8A Biomedical Grove, #06-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 > > E: [hidden email] > W: http://www.imb.a-star.edu.sg/imu/ > > > > On 29 July 2011 02:51, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> wrote: > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite > > recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to continuously > record > > temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in > > temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed to > > prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building contractor > to > > install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I recommend > > that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. The > > loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from the > > computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around the > > room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, etc. > > > > Craig > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email] > >wrote: > > > >> ***** > >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > >> ***** > >> > >> > >> Esteban: > >> > >> Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the > >> system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system in > the > >> non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain working > as > >> the trial you make the way around. > >> > >> If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the one > we > >> have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it is > the > >> size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your sample, > the > >> cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a > >> temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open > doors, or > >> change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in > temperature > >> observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h period. > In > >> such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont want > to > >> let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted changes, by > the > >> way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. > >> > >> I hope this helps a little. > >> > >> Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > >> > >> > >> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > >> > From: [hidden email] > >> > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > >> > To: [hidden email] > >> > > >> > ***** > >> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > >> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > >> > ***** > >> > > >> > Hello everyone, > >> > > >> > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have > two > >> > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I > think > >> > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. > >> One > >> > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 > degrees, > >> set > >> > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported > >> > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The > >> other > >> > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The > strange > >> > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well > >> > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the > >> > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the > components > >> work > >> > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be > happening, > >> > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the > >> > other? > >> > > >> > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to > the > >> > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the > one > >> > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate > >> > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any > >> ideas > >> > on this mystery are welcome. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Esteban > >> > >> > > > |
Zac Arrac Atelaz |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Adding to Craig explanation, and something I remember after his explanation is that the specs for optical microscopes are mainly evaluated in a small range between 220 and 628 meters above sea level, so if you take the system to a higher altitude the heat dispersion might be slower than originally calculated for the system, this is obviated some times, as the effect is not too big but this might have some effect on your results. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-altitude-pressure-d_462.html Another important thing, if your humidity is too high you can keep it below 35% safely, but if the region is too dry and you have a drying device working and humidity suddenly goes below 30% your possibilities of having ESD goes trough the roof, so if you want to be safe, my two cents is that you should try to keep humidity in the middle of the range given by the factory, far away of the "safety operation limits", because when you are walking in the limit, you can easily fall out if it, and the fail when temp is higher than asked is similar to the trouble when humidity goes below the limit asked, your drying system is not going to hudify back up. http://www.esdsystems.com/whitepapers/wp_humidity.html The links have more information on the matters exposed Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:39:45 -0600 > From: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Incubator box heating mystery > To: [hidden email] > > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > It's hard to get, but really you want +/-1 degree C and humidity <35%. This > is particularly important if you have a lot of free-space optics. Most > fiber-coupled systems can tolerate some temperature change, but free-space > beams are guided by steering mirrors. Temperature changes can cause the > mirror mounts to flex which misaligns your beam. Additionally, Ti:Saph > lasers used in two-photon HATE humidity. We're in Calgary, Canada, which is > very, very dry in the winter. We can run our lasers without a dry air or > nitrogen purge at 925nm. In the summer though, the humidity gets quite high > and purging becomes necessary. The building contractor just finished > installing a humidity control system for our lab last week, so we will see > how things go. Thus far it seems to be holding the humidity under about > 37%. I'll wait a couple weeks and then check my datalogger. @:-) > > Craig > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Graham Wright < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > I agree with Craig that the temperature and humidity loggers give you > > a real insight into what's going on with the aircon in your rooms > > (particularly over the weekends in our case). I'd be interested though > > in what you think are reasonable limits for the tolerable fluctuations > > in both temperature and humidity. We are constantly battling with both > > in Singapore! > > > > Regards, > > Graham > > > > --- > > Graham Wright, PhD > > Microscopy Unit Manager > > > > Institute of Medical Biology > > 8A Biomedical Grove, #06-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 > > > > E: [hidden email] > > W: http://www.imb.a-star.edu.sg/imu/ > > > > > > > > On 29 July 2011 02:51, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > ***** > > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > ***** > > > > > > We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite > > > recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to continuously > > record > > > temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in > > > temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed to > > > prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building contractor > > to > > > install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I recommend > > > that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. The > > > loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from the > > > computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around the > > > room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, etc. > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email] > > >wrote: > > > > > >> ***** > > >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > >> ***** > > >> > > >> > > >> Esteban: > > >> > > >> Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the > > >> system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system in > > the > > >> non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain working > > as > > >> the trial you make the way around. > > >> > > >> If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the one > > we > > >> have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it is > > the > > >> size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your sample, > > the > > >> cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a > > >> temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open > > doors, or > > >> change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in > > temperature > > >> observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h period. > > In > > >> such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont want > > to > > >> let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted changes, by > > the > > >> way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. > > >> > > >> I hope this helps a little. > > >> > > >> Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > > >> > > >> > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > > >> > From: [hidden email] > > >> > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > > >> > To: [hidden email] > > >> > > > >> > ***** > > >> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > >> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > >> > ***** > > >> > > > >> > Hello everyone, > > >> > > > >> > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I have > > two > > >> > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I > > think > > >> > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate buildings. > > >> One > > >> > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 > > degrees, > > >> set > > >> > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and reported > > >> > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). The > > >> other > > >> > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The > > strange > > >> > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work well > > >> > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto the > > >> > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the > > components > > >> work > > >> > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be > > happening, > > >> > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on the > > >> > other? > > >> > > > >> > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or to > > the > > >> > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M (the > > one > > >> > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in separate > > >> > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. Any > > >> ideas > > >> > on this mystery are welcome. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Esteban > > >> > > >> > > > > > |
Craig Brideau |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** 20% is the typical static threshold, so really you do want to keep it between 35 and 20%. Our humidity only drops below 20% in the winter, and our metal optical tables seem to keep it under control anyway. Your mileage may vary though, but overall just keep an eye on your humidity and temperature so you can correlate any problems with the environment changing (or not). Craig On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email]>wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > > Adding to Craig explanation, and something I remember after his explanation > is that the specs for optical microscopes are mainly evaluated in a small > range between 220 and 628 meters above sea level, so if you take the system > to a higher altitude the heat dispersion might be slower than originally > calculated for the system, this is obviated some times, as the effect is not > too big but this might have some effect on your results. > > http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-altitude-pressure-d_462.html > > Another important thing, if your humidity is too high you can keep it below > 35% safely, but if the region is too dry and you have a drying device > working and humidity suddenly goes below 30% your possibilities of having > ESD goes trough the roof, so if you want to be safe, my two cents is that > you should try to keep humidity in the middle of the range given by the > factory, far away of the "safety operation limits", because when you are > walking in the limit, you can easily fall out if it, and the fail when temp > is higher than asked is similar to the trouble when humidity goes below the > limit asked, your drying system is not going to hudify back up. > > http://www.esdsystems.com/whitepapers/wp_humidity.html > > The links have more information on the matters exposed > > Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > > > > > Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:39:45 -0600 > > From: [hidden email] > > Subject: Re: Incubator box heating mystery > > To: [hidden email] > > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > It's hard to get, but really you want +/-1 degree C and humidity <35%. > This > > is particularly important if you have a lot of free-space optics. Most > > fiber-coupled systems can tolerate some temperature change, but > free-space > > beams are guided by steering mirrors. Temperature changes can cause the > > mirror mounts to flex which misaligns your beam. Additionally, Ti:Saph > > lasers used in two-photon HATE humidity. We're in Calgary, Canada, which > is > > very, very dry in the winter. We can run our lasers without a dry air or > > nitrogen purge at 925nm. In the summer though, the humidity gets quite > high > > and purging becomes necessary. The building contractor just finished > > installing a humidity control system for our lab last week, so we will > see > > how things go. Thus far it seems to be holding the humidity under about > > 37%. I'll wait a couple weeks and then check my datalogger. @:-) > > > > Craig > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Graham Wright < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > ***** > > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > ***** > > > > > > I agree with Craig that the temperature and humidity loggers give you > > > a real insight into what's going on with the aircon in your rooms > > > (particularly over the weekends in our case). I'd be interested though > > > in what you think are reasonable limits for the tolerable fluctuations > > > in both temperature and humidity. We are constantly battling with both > > > in Singapore! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Graham > > > > > > --- > > > Graham Wright, PhD > > > Microscopy Unit Manager > > > > > > Institute of Medical Biology > > > 8A Biomedical Grove, #06-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 > > > > > > E: [hidden email] > > > W: http://www.imb.a-star.edu.sg/imu/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 July 2011 02:51, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > ***** > > > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > > ***** > > > > > > > > We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite > > > > recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to continuously > > > record > > > > temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in > > > > temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed to > > > > prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building > contractor > > > to > > > > install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I > recommend > > > > that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. The > > > > loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from the > > > > computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around > the > > > > room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, etc. > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz < > [hidden email] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> ***** > > > >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > >> ***** > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Esteban: > > > >> > > > >> Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of the > > > >> system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating system > in > > > the > > > >> non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain > working > > > as > > > >> the trial you make the way around. > > > >> > > > >> If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the > one > > > we > > > >> have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, it > is > > > the > > > >> size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your > sample, > > > the > > > >> cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had a > > > >> temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open > > > doors, or > > > >> change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in > > > temperature > > > >> observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h > period. > > > In > > > >> such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont > want > > > to > > > >> let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted > changes, by > > > the > > > >> way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. > > > >> > > > >> I hope this helps a little. > > > >> > > > >> Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > > > >> > From: [hidden email] > > > >> > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > > > >> > To: [hidden email] > > > >> > > > > >> > ***** > > > >> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > >> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > >> > ***** > > > >> > > > > >> > Hello everyone, > > > >> > > > > >> > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I > have > > > two > > > >> > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes (I > > > think > > > >> > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate > buildings. > > > >> One > > > >> > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 > > > degrees, > > > >> set > > > >> > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and > reported > > > >> > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). > The > > > >> other > > > >> > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The > > > strange > > > >> > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work > well > > > >> > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto > the > > > >> > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the > > > components > > > >> work > > > >> > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be > > > happening, > > > >> > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not on > the > > > >> > other? > > > >> > > > > >> > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer or > to > > > the > > > >> > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M > (the > > > one > > > >> > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in > separate > > > >> > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very similar. > Any > > > >> ideas > > > >> > on this mystery are welcome. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Esteban > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > |
G. Esteban Fernandez |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Turns out the room's temp. might be the problem if my box operates at least 10 degreesC above ambient. Where the incubator performs well the room is 20 degreesC whereas the "hot" room is 26.5, near what some suggested might be the max. limit for operation at 37. I put the "malfunctioning" equipment in the colder room as Gabriel suggested and, as expected, it works fine. Hopefully my facilities folks can lower the temp in the warmer room. I purchased the data logger Craig Brideau recommended to see how it plays out over time. Thanks again to everyone for your advice. -Esteban On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]>wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > 20% is the typical static threshold, so really you do want to keep it > between 35 and 20%. Our humidity only drops below 20% in the winter, and > our metal optical tables seem to keep it under control anyway. Your > mileage > may vary though, but overall just keep an eye on your humidity and > temperature so you can correlate any problems with the environment changing > (or not). > > Craig > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Zac Arrac Atelaz <[hidden email] > >wrote: > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > > > Adding to Craig explanation, and something I remember after his > explanation > > is that the specs for optical microscopes are mainly evaluated in a small > > range between 220 and 628 meters above sea level, so if you take the > system > > to a higher altitude the heat dispersion might be slower than originally > > calculated for the system, this is obviated some times, as the effect is > not > > too big but this might have some effect on your results. > > > > http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-altitude-pressure-d_462.html > > > > Another important thing, if your humidity is too high you can keep it > below > > 35% safely, but if the region is too dry and you have a drying device > > working and humidity suddenly goes below 30% your possibilities of having > > ESD goes trough the roof, so if you want to be safe, my two cents is that > > you should try to keep humidity in the middle of the range given by the > > factory, far away of the "safety operation limits", because when you are > > walking in the limit, you can easily fall out if it, and the fail when > temp > > is higher than asked is similar to the trouble when humidity goes below > the > > limit asked, your drying system is not going to hudify back up. > > > > http://www.esdsystems.com/whitepapers/wp_humidity.html > > > > The links have more information on the matters exposed > > > > Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:39:45 -0600 > > > From: [hidden email] > > > Subject: Re: Incubator box heating mystery > > > To: [hidden email] > > > > > > ***** > > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > ***** > > > > > > It's hard to get, but really you want +/-1 degree C and humidity <35%. > > This > > > is particularly important if you have a lot of free-space optics. Most > > > fiber-coupled systems can tolerate some temperature change, but > > free-space > > > beams are guided by steering mirrors. Temperature changes can cause the > > > mirror mounts to flex which misaligns your beam. Additionally, Ti:Saph > > > lasers used in two-photon HATE humidity. We're in Calgary, Canada, > which > > is > > > very, very dry in the winter. We can run our lasers without a dry air > or > > > nitrogen purge at 925nm. In the summer though, the humidity gets quite > > high > > > and purging becomes necessary. The building contractor just finished > > > installing a humidity control system for our lab last week, so we will > > see > > > how things go. Thus far it seems to be holding the humidity under about > > > 37%. I'll wait a couple weeks and then check my datalogger. @:-) > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Graham Wright < > > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > ***** > > > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > > ***** > > > > > > > > I agree with Craig that the temperature and humidity loggers give you > > > > a real insight into what's going on with the aircon in your rooms > > > > (particularly over the weekends in our case). I'd be interested > though > > > > in what you think are reasonable limits for the tolerable > fluctuations > > > > in both temperature and humidity. We are constantly battling with > both > > > > in Singapore! > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Graham > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Graham Wright, PhD > > > > Microscopy Unit Manager > > > > > > > > Institute of Medical Biology > > > > 8A Biomedical Grove, #06-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 > > > > > > > > E: [hidden email] > > > > W: http://www.imb.a-star.edu.sg/imu/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 July 2011 02:51, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > ***** > > > > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > > > ***** > > > > > > > > > > We had quite a bit of trouble with our room ventilation until quite > > > > > recently. We purchased an inexpensive USB datalogger to > continuously > > > > record > > > > > temperature and humidity in the room. It picked up large swings in > > > > > temperature and humidity that the ventilation system was supposed > to > > > > > prevent. The data we collected finally convinced the building > > contractor > > > > to > > > > > install proper humidity controls and hardware for our room. I > > recommend > > > > > that every facility should keep logs of temperature and humidity. > The > > > > > loggers are quite cheap now, and can be programmed, detached from > the > > > > > computer, and left unattended for months. We would move ours around > > the > > > > > room to get a feel for any gradients, heat loads from equipment, > etc. > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Zac Arrac Atelaz < > > [hidden email] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> ***** > > > > >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > > > >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > > >> ***** > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Esteban: > > > > >> > > > > >> Your problem might be the changing position of the termometer of > the > > > > >> system, one interesting trial will be putting the overheating > system > > in > > > > the > > > > >> non overheating system, to see if is that part fails or remain > > working > > > > as > > > > >> the trial you make the way around. > > > > >> > > > > >> If your system is failing you should consider one incubator as the > > one > > > > we > > > > >> have, this is not the huge box making the microscope unreachable, > it > > is > > > > the > > > > >> size of the insert in the stage and it has 4 points heating your > > sample, > > > > the > > > > >> cover, the objective used, and the water heater, we have never had > a > > > > >> temperature overshoot as the mentioned by Michael, even if we open > > > > doors, or > > > > >> change room temperature ( recorded from 18 to 27°C) the shift in > > > > temperature > > > > >> observed trough time in the incubator is about 0.5°C over a 25h > > period. > > > > In > > > > >> such long experiments we have people reviewing samples as you dont > > want > > > > to > > > > >> let the confocal working if the sample has suffered unwanted > > changes, by > > > > the > > > > >> way the brand of the one we have is a INU - Tokai hit incubator. > > > > >> > > > > >> I hope this helps a little. > > > > >> > > > > >> Gabriel Orozco Hoyuela > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:01:32 -0700 > > > > >> > From: [hidden email] > > > > >> > Subject: Incubator box heating mystery > > > > >> > To: [hidden email] > > > > >> > > > > > >> > ***** > > > > >> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go > to: > > > > >> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > > > >> > ***** > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hello everyone, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I have a very strage problem with an incubator box heating up. I > > have > > > > two > > > > >> > live cell imaging microscopes enclosed in PeCon incubator boxes > (I > > > > think > > > > >> > they are Incubator XL). The microscopes are in two separate > > buildings. > > > > >> One > > > > >> > microscope heats up significantly past the set temp. (above 41 > > > > degrees, > > > > >> set > > > > >> > to 37 degrees) even though the temp. is being measured and > > reported > > > > >> > correctly to the electronics (confirmed by a glass thermometer). > > The > > > > >> other > > > > >> > microscope works perfectly and holds at 37 degrees for days. The > > > > strange > > > > >> > thing is that when I put the temp. control components that work > > well > > > > >> > (heater, control electronics, temp. sensor, and all cables) onto > > the > > > > >> > microscope that heats up, it still heats up, even though the > > > > components > > > > >> work > > > > >> > perfectly on the other microscope! Any ideas why this might be > > > > happening, > > > > >> > why the temp. control equipment works on one microscope but not > on > > the > > > > >> > other? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The temp. equipment is stand-alone, not connected to a computer > or > > to > > > > the > > > > >> > microscope in any way. One microscope is a Zeiss Axiovert 200M > > (the > > > > one > > > > >> > that works) and the other is a Leica DM IRE2 (heats up) in > > separate > > > > >> > buildings; the incubator boxes surrounding them are very > similar. > > Any > > > > >> ideas > > > > >> > on this mystery are welcome. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > >> > Esteban > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |