Benoit Labarthe |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hello, flowers and microscopists!
Here is a chimera-type question! We have emission filters from an BD LSRII flow cytometer (disks of 25mm of diameter) and would like to use them in a CSU-X1 confocal head. Basically, the filters are fitting in the emission wheel of the CSU and we see fluorescence. My question is: do emission filters for flow cytometry and for confocal microscopy have the same properties? I may be wrong, but both are the final emission filters in front of either the PMT or the camera and thus have a similar role of filtering the emissions. In my mind, both filters should be comparable. Do I omit any critical detail? Thank you! benoit -- Benoît Labarthe, PharmD Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal Montreal Heart Institute Centre de Recherche, Laboratoire du Dr.Théroux 5000 Bélanger Est Montréal Québec Canada H1T 1C8 Tel (514)-376 3330 ext 3017 Fax (514)- 376 1076 |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
I don't know of any differences. I'm sure you'll have
no problems.
It is usually a good idea to keep the filters the same way
round
(some have an arrow to indicate the direction the light
should
go). So the side facing the PMT in the flow cytometer
should
be the side facing the camera in the
microscope.
Guy
Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Benoit Labarthe Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2008 1:52 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: LSRII filters on a CSU-X1 confocal head Here is a chimera-type question! We have emission filters from an BD LSRII flow cytometer (disks of 25mm of diameter) and would like to use them in a CSU-X1 confocal head. Basically, the filters are fitting in the emission wheel of the CSU and we see fluorescence. My question is: do emission filters for flow cytometry and for confocal microscopy have the same properties? I may be wrong, but both are the final emission filters in front of either the PMT or the camera and thus have a similar role of filtering the emissions. In my mind, both filters should be comparable. Do I omit any critical detail? Thank you! benoit -- Benoît Labarthe, PharmD Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal Montreal Heart Institute Centre de Recherche, Laboratoire du Dr.Théroux 5000 Bélanger Est Montréal Québec Canada H1T 1C8 Tel (514)-376 3330 ext 3017 Fax (514)- 376 1076 No virus found in this incoming message. No virus found in this outgoing message. |
Matt Burton-2 |
In reply to this post by Benoit Labarthe
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Benoît, the filters are the same, there should be no problem using them. Note the 15.8 mm dichroic mirrors used in a LSR II have an AOI of 11.25 degrees not the standard 45. Matt At 01:51 PM 13/03/2008 Thursday, you wrote: >Search the CONFOCAL archive at >http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Hello, flowers and >microscopists! > >Here is a chimera-type question! > >We have emission filters from an BD LSRII flow cytometer (disks of 25mm of >diameter) and would like to use them in a CSU-X1 confocal head. Basically, >the filters are fitting in the emission wheel of the CSU and we see >fluorescence. My question is: do emission filters for flow cytometry and >for confocal microscopy have the same properties? >I may be wrong, but both are the final emission filters in front of either >the PMT or the camera and thus have a similar role of filtering the >emissions. In my mind, both filters should be comparable. Do I omit any >critical detail? > >Thank you! > >benoit > >-- >Benoît Labarthe, PharmD >Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal >Montreal Heart Institute >Centre de Recherche, Laboratoire du Dr.Théroux >5000 Bélanger Est >Montréal Québec Canada H1T 1C8 >Tel (514)-376 3330 ext 3017 >Fax (514)- 376 1076 |
Michael Weber-4 |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal CSU-X1 is not using 45 degree dichomatic mirrors either, they also have low-angle incidence ones. I am not sure about the precise angle, however, these mirrors have to be produced and there are probably not so many different low-angles out there (for Nikon, Zeiss, Yokogawa). But it might make sense to ask Yokogawa for the correct angle. Michael > Search the CONFOCAL archive at > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > > Benoît, > > the filters are the same, there should be no problem using them. Note the > 15.8 mm dichroic mirrors used in a LSR II have an AOI of 11.25 degrees not > the standard 45. > > Matt > > At 01:51 PM 13/03/2008 Thursday, you wrote: >>Search the CONFOCAL archive at >>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Hello, flowers >> and >>microscopists! >> >>Here is a chimera-type question! >> >>We have emission filters from an BD LSRII flow cytometer (disks of 25mm >> of >>diameter) and would like to use them in a CSU-X1 confocal head. >> Basically, >>the filters are fitting in the emission wheel of the CSU and we see >>fluorescence. My question is: do emission filters for flow cytometry and >>for confocal microscopy have the same properties? >>I may be wrong, but both are the final emission filters in front of >> either >>the PMT or the camera and thus have a similar role of filtering the >>emissions. In my mind, both filters should be comparable. Do I omit any >>critical detail? >> >>Thank you! >> >>benoit >> >>-- >>Benoît Labarthe, PharmD >>Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal >>Montreal Heart Institute >>Centre de Recherche, Laboratoire du Dr.Théroux >>5000 Bélanger Est >>Montréal Québec Canada H1T 1C8 >>Tel (514)-376 3330 ext 3017 >>Fax (514)- 376 1076 |
Mizuho Shimizu |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Dear List, Please let me clarify CSUX1 filter requirements. As for emission filters, you can use any commercailly available emission filters of 25mm diameter as long as they have appropriate wavelength range and enough blocking capability. However, the dichroic (dichromatic) mirrors for the CSU heads(all CSU10/22/X1) have reverse charcteristics from those used for standard microscope. Please imagine the location of the dichroic mirror in the CSU scanners, which is placed between the microlens array and pinhole array at about 45 degree angle. The excitation laser beamlets focused by the the microlens will pass through the dicroic mirror and then go through the pinholes. The emission light goes back the light path to the pinholes then reflrcted by the dichroic mirror to reach at the detector(CCD camera). So, please only use specific dichroic mirrors for the CSU heads. Also, the thichness of the dichroic mirrors should be 0.5 mm +/- 0.02mm(0.01mm is more desirable) for optimal light efficiency. Please always feel free to directly contact Yokogawa for any questions. Best regards, Mizuho Shimizu *********************************************************** Mizuho Shimizu CSU Business Development Group BIO Center Life Science Business Headquarters Yokogawa Electric Corporation 2-3 Hokuyodai, Kanazawa-shi, Ishikawa 920-0177 JAPAN Phone: +81-76-258-7028 Fax: +81-76-258-7029 http://www.yokogawa.co.jp/SCANNER/english/index_e.html ________________________________________ 差出人: Confocal Microscopy List [[hidden email]] は Michael Weber [[hidden email]] の代理 送信日時: 2008年3月14日 16:56 宛先: [hidden email] 件名: Re: LSRII filters on a CSU-X1 confocal head Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal CSU-X1 is not using 45 degree dichomatic mirrors either, they also have low-angle incidence ones. I am not sure about the precise angle, however, these mirrors have to be produced and there are probably not so many different low-angles out there (for Nikon, Zeiss, Yokogawa). But it might make sense to ask Yokogawa for the correct angle. Michael > Search the CONFOCAL archive at > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > > Benoît, > > the filters are the same, there should be no problem using them. Note the > 15.8 mm dichroic mirrors used in a LSR II have an AOI of 11.25 degrees not > the standard 45. > > Matt > > At 01:51 PM 13/03/2008 Thursday, you wrote: >>Search the CONFOCAL archive at >>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Hello, flowers >> and >>microscopists! >> >>Here is a chimera-type question! >> >>We have emission filters from an BD LSRII flow cytometer (disks of 25mm >> of >>diameter) and would like to use them in a CSU-X1 confocal head. >> Basically, >>the filters are fitting in the emission wheel of the CSU and we see >>fluorescence. My question is: do emission filters for flow cytometry and >>for confocal microscopy have the same properties? >>I may be wrong, but both are the final emission filters in front of >> either >>the PMT or the camera and thus have a similar role of filtering the >>emissions. In my mind, both filters should be comparable. Do I omit any >>critical detail? >> >>Thank you! >> >>benoit >> >>-- >>Benoît Labarthe, PharmD >>Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal >>Montreal Heart Institute >>Centre de Recherche, Laboratoire du Dr.Théroux >>5000 Bélanger Est >>Montréal Québec Canada H1T 1C8 >>Tel (514)-376 3330 ext 3017 >>Fax (514)- 376 1076 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |