Kate Luby-Phelps |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** We have used 2P excitation successfully to selectively uncage in cells growing on a feeder layer without uncaging in the feeder cells. Also, in single cells in a cluster of pancreatic acinar cells. Inherent confocality of the focal volume in 2P is an advantage in cases like that. I don't think this would have been possible with 1P. |
Armstrong, Brian |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Kate, when you do these experiments are you using two lasers; uncaging with one wavelength, and imaging with another wavelength? Brian D Armstrong PhD Assistant Research Professor Light Microscopy Core Beckman Research Institute City of Hope Dept of Neuroscience 1450 E Duarte Rd Duarte, CA 91010 626-256-4673 x62872 http://www.cityofhope.org/research/support/Light-Microscopy-Digital-Imaging/Pages/default.aspx -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Kate Luby-Phelps Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 5:58 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Live cell imaging with multiphoton confocal ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** We have used 2P excitation successfully to selectively uncage in cells growing on a feeder layer without uncaging in the feeder cells. Also, in single cells in a cluster of pancreatic acinar cells. Inherent confocality of the focal volume in 2P is an advantage in cases like that. I don't think this would have been possible with 1P. --------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message and any attachments are intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are addressed. This communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law (e.g., personal health information, research data, financial information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption, individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from the sender. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Kate Luby-Phelps |
In reply to this post by Knecht, David
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** So far we have been using one laser, which means we miss the beginning of the timecourse after photoactivation because it takes several seconds for the Ti:S to tune and mode-lock. So the experiments where 2P photoactivation has been useful involve diffusion through gap junctions between cells in a cluster or chain because the spread of the photoactivated dye between cells is relatively slow. However, in June we will take delivery on a new 2P system with two Ti:S lasers so we can do it simultaneously at two different wavelengths. Kate |
Mark Cannell |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Kate Do you really need/want two Tl:S lasers for this? It may be better to use a visible and a Ti:S as I can foresee problems with continued photolysis of the cage with the probe beam if it's 2P... In our work measuring diffusion via 2P we used an Ar-ion with a 2P photolysis spot that could be either stationary or moved with the probe using the same scanning system. For analysis the stationary spot (produced by our own custom optics coupling the Ti:S bean to the rear aperture independent of the scanner) was the best way to go. The trouble is not all microscope bodies can give you the room to a fit in a short pass dichroic to do this. In our old Axiovert, we had to machine up a new coupling component to take a small dichroic on a slider. A diagram of the layout is here: Soeller, C. & Cannell, M.B. (1999) Two-photon microscopy: Imaging in scattering samples and three-dimensionally resolved flash photolysis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47:182-195. Cheers Mark On 1/05/2011, at 1:06 AM, Kate Luby-Phelps wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > So far we have been using one laser, which means we miss the > beginning of the > timecourse after photoactivation because it takes several seconds > for the Ti:S to > tune and mode-lock. So the experiments where 2P photoactivation has > been > useful involve diffusion through gap junctions between cells in a > cluster or chain > because the spread of the photoactivated dye between cells is > relatively slow. > However, in June we will take delivery on a new 2P system with two > Ti:S lasers > so we can do it simultaneously at two different wavelengths. > > Kate |
Kate Luby-Phelps |
In reply to this post by Knecht, David
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Mark, Certainly for cultured cells and not too thick specimens, your way is a good choice and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. For thick or turbid tissues or live animals, I think we will need 2P to image the probe after photoactivation. We have a user who designs 2P photoactivatable probes and we don't observe significant additional photolysis at the imaging wavelength. Kate |
Armstrong, Brian |
In reply to this post by Kate Luby-Phelps
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hello Kate, would you be willing to share what 2P system, and what lasers, you chose? What factors determined your decisions? Thanks in advance, We currently have a Prairie Ultima that we ordered with the second beam path. However, we have yet to add the second laser. Brian D Armstrong PhD Assistant Research Professor Light Microscopy Core Beckman Research Institute City of Hope Dept of Neuroscience 1450 E Duarte Rd Duarte, CA 91010 626-256-4673 x62872 http://www.cityofhope.org/research/support/Light-Microscopy-Digital-Imaging/Pages/default.aspx -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Kate Luby-Phelps Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 6:06 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Live cell imaging with multiphoton confocal ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** So far we have been using one laser, which means we miss the beginning of the timecourse after photoactivation because it takes several seconds for the Ti:S to tune and mode-lock. So the experiments where 2P photoactivation has been useful involve diffusion through gap junctions between cells in a cluster or chain because the spread of the photoactivated dye between cells is relatively slow. However, in June we will take delivery on a new 2P system with two Ti:S lasers so we can do it simultaneously at two different wavelengths. Kate --------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message and any attachments are intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are addressed. This communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law (e.g., personal health information, research data, financial information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption, individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from the sender. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |