Gregg Sobocinski |
We have
researchers seeking to stain the nuclei in live plant tissues. DAPI will not
penetrate, even in root material. Intentionally tearing or delaminating leaves
will allow DAPI penetration for a short distance, but is too invasive to the
living cells. Has anyone
tried ethidium bromide on whole, plant tissues? How about some of the other
nuclear stains? The ultimate
goal is double and triple staining with GFP to image on a laser confocal
microscope. Fixation would be okay for one of the projects, but evidently GFP
fades drastically when fixed. Anyone have
experience or suggestions? Much
appreciated, ~Gregg (on
behalf of others) Gregg
Sobocinski Microscope
Imaging Specialist University
of Michigan, MCDB Dept. Ann
Arbor, Michigan USA |
JOEL B. SHEFFIELD |
Have you tried Syto 9, from Invitrogen?
-------------- Original message --------------- We have researchers seeking to stain the nuclei in live plant tissues. DAPI will not penetrate, even in root material. Intentionally tearing or delaminating leaves will allow DAPI penetration for a short distance, but is too invasive to the living cells. Has anyone tried ethidium bromide on whole, plant tissues? How about some of the other nuclear stains? The ultimate goal is double and triple staining with GFP to image on a laser confocal microscope. Fixation would be okay for one of the projects, but evidently GFP fades drastically when fixed. Anyone have experience or suggestions? Much appreciated, ~Gregg (on behalf of others) Gregg Sobocinski Microscope Imaging Specialist University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. Ann Arbor, Michigan USA -- Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D. Biology Department, Temple University 1900 North 12th Street Philadelphia, PA 19122 [hidden email] (215) 204 8839, fax (215) 204 0486 http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs |
Rosemary.White |
Depending on the tissue, GFP fluorescence is fine after fixation with
(para)formaldehyde in buffer. Try it and see if it's OK in your tissues. You may be able to fix fairly lightly - 1-2% formaldehyde for a few minutes, just enough to permeabilise the membranes without wrecking internal structures. If you're looking at Arabidopsis roots, you should be able to see the nuclei in the transmitted light channel without staining, unless you're looking at cells in the stele. Leaves are a bit more tricky, but you can see them in Arabidopsis epidermal cells. Many of the syto dyes stain plant nuclei but they tend to stain quite a bit of other stuff as well, and also mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA. They also seem fairly toxic, but I haven't used them extensively and others may have had more success with living tissues. Draq5 works to some extent though it doesn't seem to penetrate intact plant membranes or walls very well, but I haven't explored this much. If you leave tissues in propidium iodide long enough, it will eventually get into the cells, though their membranes may be a bit compromised. You can then image PI fluorescence separately from chlorophyll, and from GFP. good luck, cheers, Rosemary Dr Rosemary White CSIRO Plant Industry GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia T 61 2 6246 5475 F 61 2 6246 5334 E [hidden email] On 18/05/10 7:15 AM, "Joel Sheffield" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Have you tried Syto 9, from Invitrogen? > > -------------- Original message --------------- > We have researchers seeking to stain the nuclei in live plant > tissues. DAPI will not penetrate, even in root material. > Intentionally tearing or delaminating leaves will allow DAPI > penetration for a short distance, but is too invasive to the living > cells. > > Has anyone tried ethidium bromide on whole, plant tissues? How about > some of the other nuclear stains? > > The ultimate goal is double and triple staining with GFP to image on > a laser confocal microscope. Fixation would be okay for one of the > projects, but evidently GFP fades drastically when fixed. > > Anyone have experience or suggestions? > > Much appreciated, > ~Gregg (on behalf of others) > > Gregg Sobocinski > Microscope Imaging Specialist > University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. > Ann Arbor, Michigan > USA > > > -- > Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D. > Biology Department, Temple University > 1900 North 12th Street > Philadelphia, PA 19122 > [hidden email] > (215) 204 8839, fax (215) 204 0486 > http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs |
In reply to this post by Gregg Sobocinski
Gregg,
Have you tried any of the Hoechst stains such Hoechst 33342? Like DAPI it is a minor groove dsDNA stain but with a higher membrane permeability and suitable for live cells. In my experience, minor groove dyes have the best specificity for dsDNA so you don't get staining of other nucleic acids outside the nucleus. If you don't care, then the SYTO dyes including 11 and 13, besides 9, might be useful. Mario M. >We have researchers seeking to stain the nuclei in live plant >tissues. DAPI will not penetrate, even in root material. >Intentionally tearing or delaminating leaves will allow DAPI >penetration for a short distance, but is too invasive to the living >cells. > >Has anyone tried ethidium bromide on whole, plant tissues? How about >some of the other nuclear stains? > >The ultimate goal is double and triple staining with GFP to image on >a laser confocal microscope. Fixation would be okay for one of the >projects, but evidently GFP fades drastically when fixed. > >Anyone have experience or suggestions? > >Much appreciated, >~Gregg (on behalf of others) > >Gregg Sobocinski >Microscope Imaging Specialist >University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. >Ann Arbor, Michigan >USA > -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Mario M. Moronne, Ph.D. [hidden email] [hidden email] |
Gregg Sobocinski |
Mario,
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I think Hoechst is definitely worth a try, based on your recommendation. I appreciate the info about the SYTO dyes as well. This is the kind of information we've been looking for before purchasing any new dyes. I'll pass this along to our researchers. Thanks to others that have responded as well. Any new feedback is still welcome. Regards, ~Gregg Gregg Sobocinski Microscope Imaging Specialist University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. 3040 Natural Science (Kraus) Bldg 615-2034 -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mario Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 5:24 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Gregg, Have you tried any of the Hoechst stains such Hoechst 33342? Like DAPI it is a minor groove dsDNA stain but with a higher membrane permeability and suitable for live cells. In my experience, minor groove dyes have the best specificity for dsDNA so you don't get staining of other nucleic acids outside the nucleus. If you don't care, then the SYTO dyes including 11 and 13, besides 9, might be useful. Mario M. >We have researchers seeking to stain the nuclei in live plant >tissues. DAPI will not penetrate, even in root material. >Intentionally tearing or delaminating leaves will allow DAPI >penetration for a short distance, but is too invasive to the living >cells. > >Has anyone tried ethidium bromide on whole, plant tissues? How about >some of the other nuclear stains? > >The ultimate goal is double and triple staining with GFP to image on >a laser confocal microscope. Fixation would be okay for one of the >projects, but evidently GFP fades drastically when fixed. > >Anyone have experience or suggestions? > >Much appreciated, >~Gregg (on behalf of others) > >Gregg Sobocinski >Microscope Imaging Specialist >University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. >Ann Arbor, Michigan >USA > -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Mario M. Moronne, Ph.D. [hidden email] [hidden email] |
Hann Ling Wong |
In reply to this post by Gregg Sobocinski
Dear Gregg,
Perhaps your colleagues may try adding a small amount of detergent like triton. I used 0.1% triton with DAPI for epidermal onion cells and Arabidopsis lateral roots. Good luck. Hann Ling WONG, Ph.D. Associate Professor Dept. of Biological Science Faculty of Science (Perak Campus) Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat 31900 Kampar, Perak Malaysia Email: [hidden email] [hidden email] On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Sobocinski, Gregg <[hidden email]> wrote: > We have researchers seeking to stain the nuclei in live plant tissues. DAPI > will not penetrate, even in root material. Intentionally tearing or > delaminating leaves will allow DAPI penetration for a short distance, but is > too invasive to the living cells. > > > > Has anyone tried ethidium bromide on whole, plant tissues? How about some of > the other nuclear stains? > > > > The ultimate goal is double and triple staining with GFP to image on a laser > confocal microscope. Fixation would be okay for one of the projects, but > evidently GFP fades drastically when fixed. > > > > Anyone have experience or suggestions? > > > > Much appreciated, > > ~Gregg (on behalf of others) > > > > Gregg Sobocinski > > Microscope Imaging Specialist > > University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. > > Ann Arbor, Michigan > > USA > > |
Alex Bannigan |
In reply to this post by Gregg Sobocinski
Gregg,
I have been trying to stain DNA in live GFP-expressing arabidopsis roots for a few years and I haven't found anything really good. I've tried DAPI, SYTO82 (and several other SYTO dyes), DRAQ9, Ethidium Bromide, Propidium iodide, SYBR Green, Hoechst and probably others. Most of them stain the DNA to some extent (at least in roots), but the problem I find is that the combined stress of the DNA dye, the GFP and the laser tends to make the cells very sad, causing mitosis (which is what I am trying to watch) to stop, even in cells that have already started. Adding a mutation into the mix makes things even worse. I had some success with SYTO82, but, as Rosemary said, it has an annoying side-effect of heavily staining the mitochondria as well as the nuclear DNA. If you find anything that works for you, please post a report - I'd LOVE to hear about it. Alex ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Alex Bannigan Director of Microscopy Biology Department, MSC 7801 James Madison University 800 South Main St Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA [hidden email] phone: 540-5684521 http://csm.jmu.edu/biology/bannigax :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |
Gregg Sobocinski |
Alex,
Thanks so much for the useful report about things you've tried. I will compile the responses from the Listerver community, and will make sure you receive a copy for your reference. I'll try to remember to post whatever works for us, although I cannot say what time frame that will take. At the very least, you are the voice to console us if we continue to have troubles. Regards, ~Gregg Gregg Sobocinski Microscope Imaging Specialist University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. Ann Arbor, Michigan USA -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alex Bannigan Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:15 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Gregg, I have been trying to stain DNA in live GFP-expressing arabidopsis roots for a few years and I haven't found anything really good. I've tried DAPI, SYTO82 (and several other SYTO dyes), DRAQ9, Ethidium Bromide, Propidium iodide, SYBR Green, Hoechst and probably others. Most of them stain the DNA to some extent (at least in roots), but the problem I find is that the combined stress of the DNA dye, the GFP and the laser tends to make the cells very sad, causing mitosis (which is what I am trying to watch) to stop, even in cells that have already started. Adding a mutation into the mix makes things even worse. I had some success with SYTO82, but, as Rosemary said, it has an annoying side-effect of heavily staining the mitochondria as well as the nuclear DNA. If you find anything that works for you, please post a report - I'd LOVE to hear about it. Alex ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Alex Bannigan Director of Microscopy Biology Department, MSC 7801 James Madison University 800 South Main St Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA [hidden email] phone: 540-5684521 http://csm.jmu.edu/biology/bannigax :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |
Ignatius, Mike-2 |
Hello All,
To add to this ever growing offering, we have read reports using SYTO 42, SYBR Green I, and Hoechst 33258 in live plants. If you reply directly to me I can send along an 11 page Plant Technology article one of our Tech Specialist, Dr. Ed Leber, created last year summmarizing over 75 publications using our dyes for plant studies. From cell walls to nuclei. We should also mention the new BrdU replacement, Click-iT EdU will label dividing plant cells very well. They are labeled alive, but detected after fix and perm. The benefit of EdU is no treatment necessary to expose EdU handle to its detection reagent, unlike the harsh chemical or DNAse treatments required for BrdU. Shorter too, for most protocols, 7 hrs vs 21hrs. Detection is any range of colors. Regards, Mike Ignatius Molecular Probes/Life Technologies [hidden email] -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Sobocinski, Gregg Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 7:30 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Alex, Thanks so much for the useful report about things you've tried. I will compile the responses from the Listerver community, and will make sure you receive a copy for your reference. I'll try to remember to post whatever works for us, although I cannot say what time frame that will take. At the very least, you are the voice to console us if we continue to have troubles. Regards, ~Gregg Gregg Sobocinski Microscope Imaging Specialist University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. Ann Arbor, Michigan USA -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alex Bannigan Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:15 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Gregg, I have been trying to stain DNA in live GFP-expressing arabidopsis roots for a few years and I haven't found anything really good. I've tried DAPI, SYTO82 (and several other SYTO dyes), DRAQ9, Ethidium Bromide, Propidium iodide, SYBR Green, Hoechst and probably others. Most of them stain the DNA to some extent (at least in roots), but the problem I find is that the combined stress of the DNA dye, the GFP and the laser tends to make the cells very sad, causing mitosis (which is what I am trying to watch) to stop, even in cells that have already started. Adding a mutation into the mix makes things even worse. I had some success with SYTO82, but, as Rosemary said, it has an annoying side-effect of heavily staining the mitochondria as well as the nuclear DNA. If you find anything that works for you, please post a report - I'd LOVE to hear about it. Alex ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Alex Bannigan Director of Microscopy Biology Department, MSC 7801 James Madison University 800 South Main St Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA [hidden email] phone: 540-5684521 http://csm.jmu.edu/biology/bannigax :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |
Rosemary.White |
Dear all,
Sorry for delayed reply, email crash hid this in another folder.... The main thing to remember is that SOME of these DNA dyes will work fantastically for SOME live plant tissues. DAPI is a fabulous stain for DNA in live nuclei in many algae for example. It depends on a combination of the cell wall and membrane. You just have to try them out, but it can get jolly expensive. And almost all DNA stains, at least in my hands, stain the plant cell wall, which is sometimes a pain. The common groove-binders like DAPI, Hoechst and PI certainly do, and if I remember correctly, the syto dyes do, and so does DRAQ5. The membrane properties - types of phospholipid, size of membrane potential, etc. will affect uptake of these charged dyes. Just had a thought that you may be able to permeabilise with ionophores (rather than detergents) to allow dye entry. Haven't tried it but might be worth a go. In the long run, if you're working with Arabidopsis and want to see live nuclei, it may be worthwhile to cross your GFP-tagged line with a line expressing mTomato- or citrine- or cerulean-tagged histone or perhaps a tagged nuclear envelope protein (that isn't also in the ER). There's usually associated antibiotic resistance you can use to get homozygous lines. For chromosomes/DNA, it may be possible to tag a DNA-binding protein or some other nuclear DNA-associated protein - I don't know if such lines are available from the Arabidopsis stock centre. Would be worth asking the Arabidopsis list if interested. cheers, Rosemary On 20/05/10 1:56 AM, "Ignatius, Mike" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello All, > > To add to this ever growing offering, we have read reports using SYTO 42, SYBR > Green I, and Hoechst 33258 in live plants. If you reply directly to me I can > send along an 11 page Plant Technology article one of our Tech Specialist, Dr. > Ed Leber, created last year summmarizing over 75 publications using our dyes > for plant studies. From cell walls to nuclei. > > We should also mention the new BrdU replacement, Click-iT EdU will label > dividing plant cells very well. They are labeled alive, but detected after > fix and perm. The benefit of EdU is no treatment necessary to expose EdU > handle to its detection reagent, unlike the harsh chemical or DNAse treatments > required for BrdU. Shorter too, for most protocols, 7 hrs vs 21hrs. > Detection is any range of colors. > > Regards, > > Mike Ignatius > > Molecular Probes/Life Technologies > > [hidden email] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On > Behalf Of Sobocinski, Gregg > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 7:30 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and > leaves) > > Alex, > Thanks so much for the useful report about things you've tried. I will compile > the responses from the Listerver community, and will make sure you receive a > copy for your reference. I'll try to remember to post whatever works for us, > although I cannot say what time frame that will take. > > At the very least, you are the voice to console us if we continue to have > troubles. > > Regards, > ~Gregg > > Gregg Sobocinski > Microscope Imaging Specialist > University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. > Ann Arbor, Michigan > USA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On > Behalf Of Alex Bannigan > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:15 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and > leaves) > > Gregg, > I have been trying to stain DNA in live GFP-expressing arabidopsis roots for a > few years and I haven't found anything really good. > I've tried DAPI, SYTO82 (and several other SYTO dyes), DRAQ9, Ethidium > Bromide, Propidium iodide, SYBR Green, Hoechst and probably others. Most of > them stain the DNA to some extent (at least in roots), but the problem I find > is that the combined stress of the DNA dye, the GFP and the laser tends to > make the cells very sad, causing mitosis (which is what I am trying to watch) > to stop, even in cells that have already started. Adding a mutation into the > mix makes things even worse. > I had some success with SYTO82, but, as Rosemary said, it has an annoying > side-effect of heavily staining the mitochondria as well as the nuclear DNA. > If you find anything that works for you, please post a report - I'd LOVE to > hear about it. > Alex > > ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > Alex Bannigan > Director of Microscopy > Biology Department, MSC 7801 > James Madison University > 800 South Main St > Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA > [hidden email] > phone: 540-5684521 > http://csm.jmu.edu/biology/bannigax > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |
Zucker.Robert |
In reply to this post by Ignatius, Mike-2
Mike
can you send me this article on plant stains. It may provide the necessary material and knowledge for my next Nikon submission what did Leica stain there famous plant cell with that they use for QA. bob Robert Zucker PhD USEPA NHEERL TAD MD 67 RTP NC 27711 Tel: 919-541-1585 fax -919-541-4017 shipping address RTF building 2525 E.NC highway 54 Durham NC 27713 |------------> | From: | |------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Ignatius, Mike" <[hidden email]> | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |[hidden email] | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |05/19/2010 12:08 PM | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Vendor Reply | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Sent by: | |------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hello All, To add to this ever growing offering, we have read reports using SYTO 42, SYBR Green I, and Hoechst 33258 in live plants. If you reply directly to me I can send along an 11 page Plant Technology article one of our Tech Specialist, Dr. Ed Leber, created last year summmarizing over 75 publications using our dyes for plant studies. From cell walls to nuclei. We should also mention the new BrdU replacement, Click-iT EdU will label dividing plant cells very well. They are labeled alive, but detected after fix and perm. The benefit of EdU is no treatment necessary to expose EdU handle to its detection reagent, unlike the harsh chemical or DNAse treatments required for BrdU. Shorter too, for most protocols, 7 hrs vs 21hrs. Detection is any range of colors. Regards, Mike Ignatius Molecular Probes/Life Technologies [hidden email] -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Sobocinski, Gregg Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 7:30 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Alex, Thanks so much for the useful report about things you've tried. I will compile the responses from the Listerver community, and will make sure you receive a copy for your reference. I'll try to remember to post whatever works for us, although I cannot say what time frame that will take. At the very least, you are the voice to console us if we continue to have troubles. Regards, ~Gregg Gregg Sobocinski Microscope Imaging Specialist University of Michigan, MCDB Dept. Ann Arbor, Michigan USA -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alex Bannigan Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:15 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Nuclear staining of live, intact plant material (roots and leaves) Gregg, I have been trying to stain DNA in live GFP-expressing arabidopsis roots for a few years and I haven't found anything really good. I've tried DAPI, SYTO82 (and several other SYTO dyes), DRAQ9, Ethidium Bromide, Propidium iodide, SYBR Green, Hoechst and probably others. Most of them stain the DNA to some extent (at least in roots), but the problem I find is that the combined stress of the DNA dye, the GFP and the laser tends to make the cells very sad, causing mitosis (which is what I am trying to watch) to stop, even in cells that have already started. Adding a mutation into the mix makes things even worse. I had some success with SYTO82, but, as Rosemary said, it has an annoying side-effect of heavily staining the mitochondria as well as the nuclear DNA. If you find anything that works for you, please post a report - I'd LOVE to hear about it. Alex ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Alex Bannigan Director of Microscopy Biology Department, MSC 7801 James Madison University 800 South Main St Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA [hidden email] phone: 540-5684521 http://csm.jmu.edu/biology/bannigax :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |