Hi List, A recent post made me think to ask, here: Anybody knows of a manual 3D segmentation tool that would help (without going via photoshop!)? Eric |
Hi Eric,
I have had sucess getting it done in metamorph by segmenting individual slices and then making them into a stack that can then be analysed in any 3D software such as metamorph or imaris. What is it about your small features that make them difficult to segment? Cheers Cam Cameron J. Nowell Microscpy Manager Central Resource for Advanced Microscopy Ludwig Insttue for Cancer Research PO Box 2008 Royal Melbourne Hospital Victoria, 3050 AUSTRALIA Office: +61 3 9341 3155 Mobile: +61422882700 Fax: +61 3 9341 3104 http://www.ludwig.edu.au/branch/research/platform/microscopy.htm ________________________________ From: Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Eric Scarfone Sent: Tue 1/09/2009 5:45 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Segmentation in 3D Hi List, A recent post made me think to ask, here: I need to segment small features in 3D stacks that can only be outlined manually. Problem is that given their size, these structures are somwhat undersampled and the tool that I am using now does not permit to modify interpolation levels. The 3D objects that I get are too much smoothed out. Anybody knows of a manual 3D segmentation tool that would help (without going via photoshop!)? Eric Eric Scarfone, PhD, CNRS, Center for Hearing and communication Research Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Postal Address: CFH, M1:02 Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden Work: +46 (0)8-517 79343, Cell: +46 (0)70 888 2352 Fax: +46 (0)8-301876 email: [hidden email] http://www.ki.se/cfh/ |
Carol Bayles |
In reply to this post by Eric Scarfone
>
>Dear Colleague: > >Please join us at the fourth annual Northeast Regional Life Sciences >Core Directors (NERLSCD) meeting that will be held November 9-11, >2009, at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. > >The NERLSCD 2009 meeting will be a regional forum for core facility >directors and managers to network with colleagues, to learn about >biotechnology advances and applications, and to discuss the >challenges and results of implementing shared research resources. >There will be presentations and discussion forums on operational >issues facing biotechnology core laboratories. There will be >scientific sessions and technical workshops on genomics, proteomics, >imaging, and other technologies, including next generation >sequencing, microarrays, proteomics, metabolomics, optical imaging, >flow cytometry, stem cells, nanobiotechnology, and bioinformatics. >A core facility poster session will offer an opportunity for >learning about regional life sciences shared resources and services. >Participants will be able to post and to learn of core facility >related employment opportunities. A satellite meeting before the >main conference will focus on laboratory robotics. >Tours will be given of core facilities. There will be an opening >reception and numerous opportunities to network with colleagues. > >Registration and more information about the meeting can be found at >http://www.nerlscd.org. Registration will be limited, so please >register early. > >We look forward to seeing you at the NERLSCD 2009 meeting! > > >The NERLSCD 2009 Meeting Organizing Committee, including George >Grills (Cornell University), Theodore Thannhauser (USDA-ARS), >Timothy Hunter (University of Vermont), Pamela Scott Adams (Trudeau >Institute), Stephen Bobin (Dartmouth Medical School), Michelle >Detwiler (Roswell Park Cancer Institute), Katia Sol-Church (Center >for Pediatric Research, NCC-Delaware), and Susanna Perkins >(University of Massachusetts Medical School). -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Carol Bayles, Manager Microscopy & Imaging Facility (MIF) Life Sciences Core Lab Center B46 Weill Hall 607-254-4860 607-254-6379 fax http://cores.lifesciences.cornell.edu Confocal and Multiphoton Microscopy Nanobiotechnology Center www.nbtc.cornell.edu Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 |
In reply to this post by Eric Scarfone
Since no-one else has answered I'll try. Interpolated points are not
real and are fabricated data. This is only justifiable if the interpolated values follow a smooth curve (surface) that passes through the actual data points and assumes that the original data set was sampled _correctly_. If the original data was not sampled correctly (undersampled) you can get aliasing which introduces artifacts (high spatial frequency components now appear in the low frequency domain). Interpolation may also follow smoothed data when the spatial content is reduced. There is no way you can (or should) increase spatial content above that defined by Nyquist which was set by your initial data acqusition. This is why on the Vancouver course we stress the importance of correctly sampling the data. Cheers Mark Eric Scarfone wrote: > > Hi List, > > A recent post made me think to ask, here: > I need to segment small features in 3D stacks that can only be > outlined manually. Problem is that given their size, these structures > are somwhat undersampled and the tool that I am using now does not > permit to modify interpolation levels. The 3D objects that I get are > too much smoothed out. > > Anybody knows of a manual 3D segmentation tool that would help > (without going via photoshop!)? > > Eric > > Eric Scarfone, PhD, CNRS, > Center for Hearing and communication Research > Department of Clinical Neuroscience > Karolinska Institutet > > Postal Address: > CFH, M1:02 > Karolinska Hospital, > SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden > > Work: +46 (0)8-517 79343, > Cell: +46 (0)70 888 2352 > Fax: +46 (0)8-301876 > > email: [hidden email] > http://www.ki.se/cfh/ > > |
In reply to this post by Cameron Nowell
Hi Mark, Cameron, I fully agree with Mark on the importance of sampling at the proper rate! However a question still bugs me on that one, should one follow the lead of objective resolution of should one be more concerned by the size of the object one wants to image. The present case however is somewhat of a counter example, since the objects I am trying to segment are details of large images. Would I still have access to the preparation/microcscope, I would definitely zoom in on those details. But I did not see them then and only have the image stacks to work with! Thanks fo rthe suggetion to go via metamorph. I did use Photoshop that helps similarly!! But it is a detour ?;^) Cheers Eric > > Cam > > > > Cameron J. Nowell > Microscpy Manager > Central Resource for Advanced Microscopy > Ludwig Insttue for Cancer Research > PO Box 2008 > Royal Melbourne Hospital > Victoria, 3050 > AUSTRALIA > > Office: +61 3 9341 3155 > Mobile: +61422882700 > Fax: +61 3 9341 3104 > > http://www.ludwig.edu.au/branch/research/platform/microscopy.htm > > > ________________________________ > > From: Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Eric Scarfone > Sent: Tue 1/09/2009 5:45 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Segmentation in 3D > > > > Hi List, > > A recent post made me think to ask, here: > I need to segment small features in 3D stacks that can only be > structures are somwhat undersampled and the tool that I am using > now does not permit to modify interpolation levels. The 3D objects > that I get are too much smoothed out. > > Anybody knows of a manual 3D segmentation tool that would help > (without going via photoshop!)? > > Eric > > Eric Scarfone, PhD, CNRS, > Center for Hearing and communication Research > Department of Clinical Neuroscience > Karolinska Institutet > > Postal Address: > CFH, M1:02 > Karolinska Hospital, > SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden > > Work: +46 (0)8-517 79343, > Cell: +46 (0)70 888 2352 > Fax: +46 (0)8-301876 > > email: [hidden email] > http://www.ki.se/cfh/ > |
Cesare -ALEMBIC- |
In reply to this post by Carol Bayles
Dear All,
thinking to perform membrane repair assay in witch membrane damage is induced with a two-photon confocal laser-scanning (usually), I have a question: Does it is possible perform this assay with a normal single photon confocal microscope as well? Anybody has experienced it? thank you very much! Cesare Dr. Cesare Covino ALEMBIC Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy BioImaging Center San Raffaele Scientific Institute via Olgettina 58, 20132 - Milano - Italy ----------------------------------------------------------------- La tua mano puo' lasciare un segno importante. Dona il tuo 5 per mille al San Raffaele di Milano. E' SEMPLICE E NON COSTA NULLA. Basta indicare nell'apposito riquadro della dichiarazione dei redditi "Finanziamento della ricerca sanitaria" il codice fiscale della Fondazione Centro S. Raffaele del Monte Tabor: 03 06 42 80 153 e ricordarsi di firmare. Per saperne di piu': [hidden email] o vai sul sito http://www.5xmille.org. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |