![]() ![]() |
Steven Bourke |
![]() |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal A quick question, As per the majority of users there is more than one manufactures scope in our lab and I have a memory that certain manufactures lens can be used on more than one scope. Is this still correct or have they all now different thread pitch etc etc I guess the other option is to have an adapter collar made which will provide the required flexibility. The reason I ask I'm in the process of getting a 4X/5X objective and can't seem to find what I want with Zeiss. (As an aside)What is the lists experience on low mag objectives with upright scopes for fluorescent whole tissue imaging. Olympus offer a 2X/4X with the option of dipping cover and feedback from users. Many thanks Steve Bourke Smooth Muscle Research Center DKIT Ireland |
![]() ![]() |
Julian Smith III |
![]() |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal If you mean the infinity-corrected objectives, I've not found any that interchange and give what I'd call a satisfactory image. They all seem to have different-focal-length tube lenses to generate the "infinity" space. If you mean old-style 160mm lenses, then yes: Zeiss, Olympus LB-series (also 37mm series with a PLEZY adapter), and Leitz 170mm/DIN-length (or 37mm length with a PLEZY) objectives are functionally interchangeable, in my experience. Nikon CF 160mm objectives will fit, but the chromatic correction is 'way off. Leitz 160mm ditto, although my experiece with those is more limited. HTH Julian >Search the CONFOCAL archive at >http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > >A quick question, > >As per the majority of users there is more than one manufactures scope in >our lab and I have a memory that certain manufactures lens can be used on >more than one scope. Is this still correct or have they all now different >thread pitch etc etc > >I guess the other option is to have an adapter collar made which will >provide the required flexibility. > >The reason I ask I'm in the process of getting a 4X/5X objective and can't >seem to find what I want with Zeiss. > >(As an aside)What is the lists experience on low mag objectives with upright >scopes for fluorescent whole tissue imaging. Olympus offer a 2X/4X with the >option of dipping cover and feedback from users. > > >Many thanks > >Steve Bourke >Smooth Muscle Research Center >DKIT >Ireland -- Julian P.S. Smith III Director, Winthrop Microscopy Facility Dept. of Biology Winthrop University 520 Cherry Rd. Rock Hill, SC 29733 803-323-2111 x6427 (vox) 803-323-3448 (fax) 803-524-2347 (cell) |
![]() ![]() |
Glen MacDonald-2 |
![]() |
In reply to this post by Steven Bourke
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Zeiss and Olympus are nearly interchangeable according to Zeiss documentation. The major issues are focal lengths of the tube lenses and lateral chromatic aberration. Olympus fully corrects in the lens and Zeiss corrects for with the intermediate lens. A Zeiss 25X/.8 MI lens on an Olympus confocal gave good results when zoomed 2X to avoid the lateral aberrations. The threads matched. However, if the Zeiss tube lens is over-correcting and Olympus lens it may be a question of testing on multi-color beads. If the effect is at the margins of the field and you can live with a bit of zoom then if may work. The mag will about 9% larger due to the difference in f-tube, giving a slight darker image. Regards, Glen Glen MacDonald Core for Communication Research Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center Box 357923 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-7923 USA (206) 616-4156 [hidden email] ************************************************************************ ****** The box said "Requires WindowsXP or better", so I bought a Macintosh. ************************************************************************ ****** On Apr 1, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Steven Bourke wrote: > Search the CONFOCAL archive at > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > > A quick question, > > As per the majority of users there is more than one manufactures > scope in > our lab and I have a memory that certain manufactures lens can be > used on > more than one scope. Is this still correct or have they all now > different > thread pitch etc etc > > I guess the other option is to have an adapter collar made which will > provide the required flexibility. > > The reason I ask I'm in the process of getting a 4X/5X objective > and can't > seem to find what I want with Zeiss. > > (As an aside)What is the lists experience on low mag objectives > with upright > scopes for fluorescent whole tissue imaging. Olympus offer a 2X/4X > with the > option of dipping cover and feedback from users. > > > Many thanks > > Steve Bourke > Smooth Muscle Research Center > DKIT > Ireland |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |