Hi all, I have a question concerning Z sectioning. We have a Leica SP2 and when set the top and bottom range for a Z stack, the software automatically calculates the optimised number of sections, which is nearly always over 100! This is however not practical as the stacks take too long to acquire. Can anyone shed some light on how the software decides how many slices are necessary and if I haven't got time to take 100, how can I work out what will be a sufficient number. Thanks for your help in advance. Matt Pearson. |
> how the software decides how many slices are necessary and if I
haven't got time to take 100, how can I work out what will be a sufficient number. I guess it really depends on your goal, or what you're looking for, as I'm not certain there's any arbitrary "sufficient number"... So what are you looking for/at? Matthew Pearson wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a question concerning Z sectioning. We have a Leica SP2 and > when set the top and bottom range for a Z stack, the software > automatically calculates the optimised number of sections, which is > nearly always over 100! This is however not practical as the stacks > take too long to acquire. Can anyone shed some light on how the > software decides how many slices are necessary and if I haven't got > time to take 100, how can I work out what will be a sufficient number. > > Thanks for your help in advance. > > Matt Pearson. > > > |
In reply to this post by Matthew Pearson-3
Dear Matt,
Typically such calculations are done by calculating the maximal optical resolution in Z-direction for the given objective (NA) and pinhole size and taking a 2x oversampling. This is how it is done e.g. in the Zeiss software. The Leica SP2 unfortunately doesn't do this automatically - as far as I recall it takes the X-Y resolution values also for calculating the Z-sections. You can kind of cheat the system by setting the oversampling factor to 2. (Under Settings/Scan options/Sampling factor). Cheers Gabor > > Hi all, > > I have a question concerning Z sectioning. We have a Leica SP2 and > when set the top and bottom range for a Z stack, the software > automatically calculates the optimised number of sections, which is > nearly always over 100! This is however not practical as the stacks > take too long to acquire. Can anyone shed some light on how the > software decides how many slices are necessary and if I haven't got > time to take 100, how can I work out what will be a sufficient number. > > Thanks for your help in advance. > > Matt Pearson. > > > -- Gabor Csucs Light Microscopy Centre, ETH Zurich Schafmattstrasse 18, HPM F16 CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland Web: www.lmc.ethz.ch Phone: +41 44 633 6221 Fax: +41 44 632 1298 e-mail: [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Matthew Pearson-3
The Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy by James Pawley is also an excellent resource in this regards. However, if time is of the essence and you can achieve your goals using a stereological approach then design a random sampling protocol and use statistics to extrapolate your data. The best protocol will be tailored to your needs and prior knowledge of your sample will help. ie. are you searching for a regular or irregular object... Your sample will determine the types of assumptions that can be made. Hope that helps, Fred On 3-Oct-08, at 8:40 AM, Matthew Pearson wrote:
Fred D. Mast Department of Cell Biology Medical Sciences Building Room 5-14 University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7 Canada Tel: 1-780-492-7407 |
In reply to this post by Matthew Pearson-3
Hi Matt,
Just some advice for after you've decided how many sections to use. Don't try to use one of the other preset #sections that appear when you click on the "sect" button. I found that this causes the coordinates for the top and/or bottom of the stack to change. I tested this by imaging the same stack three times in a row at different preset section numbers, and found that the top of the stack had changed by 3 microns. Leica had no explanation for this, they just said to select "others," which brings up a window in which you can enter either a section spacing or the number of sections. Regards, Carol On Oct 3, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Matthew Pearson wrote:
Carol E. Norris, Ph.D Facility Scientist Flow Cytometry/Confocal Microscopy Facility Biotechnology/Bioservices Center University of Connecticut Unit 3149 91 N. Eagleville Rd Storrs, CT 06269-3149 Phone (860) 486-3080 Fax (860) 486-5005 |
In reply to this post by Matthew Pearson-3
Matt,
Fred's reply is particularly relevant. I would make a suggestion, though, which is that because of R.I. mismatch and spherical aberration the actual z-axis resolutions is almost always worse than the theoretical by a significant amount. For example, a 1.4 NA oil objective at 10 um into a sample should have a z- res about 0.45 um (FWHM) using 488 nm. In actual practise, it is usually closer to 0.6-0.8 um and it gets worse (much worse) the further into a sample you go. In any event, the closer you stay near the coverslip boundary the more justified it is to use a high sampling number. In the case of a layer of cells 20 um thick, a 128 sections gives ~0.16 um spacing. Much more than you need to satisfy Nyquist even if everything is perfect for 488 nm excitation. Realistically, 64 sections should do the job in a real sample. Fewer than that starts to become risky for a 1.4 NA lens. Depending on what you are doing, 64 frames should be enough. Good luck Mario >Hi all, > >I have a question concerning Z sectioning. We have a Leica SP2 and >when set the top and bottom range for a Z stack, the software >automatically calculates the optimised number of sections, which is >nearly always over 100! This is however not practical as the stacks >take too long to acquire. Can anyone shed some light on how the >software decides how many slices are necessary and if I haven't got >time to take 100, how can I work out what will be a sufficient >number. > >Thanks for your help in advance. > >Matt Pearson. -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Mario M. Moronne, Ph.D. [hidden email] [hidden email] [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Carol Norris
Hi Carol,
what the Leica software does (AFAIK): - you choose the number of layers you want (dropdown menu or over the "others" dialogue, doesn't matter) - the software divides the stacksize chosen by you with this number and gets a value for your stepsize (if you choose a stepsize from the "others" dialogue start from here) - the software adapts the stepsize value to the nearest stepsize the z-motor can handle - then the software multiplies the new stepsize with the number of layers and there you have the new z range for your stack. This is just 3rd party information, maybe it would be better if someone from Leica would comment on this. Kind regards, Christian Carol Norris wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Just some advice for after you've decided how many sections to use. > Don't try to use one of the other preset #sections that appear when > you click on the "sect" button. I found that this causes the > coordinates for the top and/or bottom of the stack to change. I tested > this by imaging the same stack three times in a row at different > preset section numbers, and found that the top of the stack had > changed by 3 microns. Leica had no explanation for this, they just > said to select "others," which brings up a window in which you can > enter either a section spacing or the number of sections. > > Regards, > Carol > > On Oct 3, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Matthew Pearson wrote: > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have a question concerning Z sectioning. We have a Leica SP2 and >> when set the top and bottom range for a Z stack, the software >> automatically calculates the optimised number of sections, which is >> nearly always over 100! This is however not practical as the stacks >> take too long to acquire. Can anyone shed some light on how the >> software decides how many slices are necessary and if I haven't got >> time to take 100, how can I work out what will be a sufficient number. >> >> Thanks for your help in advance. >> >> Matt Pearson. >> >> > > > > Carol E. Norris, Ph.D > > Facility Scientist > > Flow Cytometry/Confocal Microscopy Facility > > Biotechnology/Bioservices Center > > University of Connecticut Unit 3149 > > 91 N. Eagleville Rd > > Storrs, CT 06269-3149 > > > Phone (860) 486-3080 > > Fax (860) 486-5005 > > -- Christian Liebig, PhD FILM - Facility for Imaging by Light Microscopy - Facility Assistant - Sir Alexander Fleming Building, desk 403 Imperial College London / South Kensington Exhibition Road London SW7 2AZ UK Tel. +44-(0)20-759-49793 Fax +44-(0)20-759-43100 E-mail [hidden email] Website: http://imperial.ac.uk/imagingfacility |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |