bacteria and plant roots

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
cromey cromey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

bacteria and plant roots

Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

I have a user that I’ve been training on our Zeiss LSM 510-Meta.  Her samples are plant root tips (a native desert plant, “quail bush”) and she is looking for a specific type of bacteria that may be located on the surface of the roots.  To differentiate the one type of bacteria from all the others she has done FISH using CY5.  Her expectation is that these specific bacteria will only constitute a subset of the entire bacterial population, consequently we may have to look around to find them.  Wow, plant tissue certainly has a lot of non-specific background fluorescence throughout the visible range (I usually work with mammalian tissues)!

 

Is there a way to reduce the plant autofluorescence?

 

Is it even reasonable to think that we could image a small spot of FISH fluorescence with enough signal to overcome the background autofluorescence?

 

Is there a better/different way to do this?

 

Doug

 

 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Douglas W. Cromey, M.S. - Assistant Scientific Investigator

Dept. of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of Arizona

1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ  85724-5044 USA

 

office:  AHSC 4212         email: [hidden email]

voice:  520-626-2824       fax:  520-626-2097

 

http://swehsc.pharmacy.arizona.edu/exppath/

Home of: "Microscopy and Imaging Resources on the WWW"

 

Mayandi Sivaguru Mayandi Sivaguru
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bacteria and plant roots

Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Doug, You can do many things to overcome these problems.
1) Usually, I have not seen autofluorescence in plant roots at cy5 channel Ex 640 nm and beyond, and emission Beyond 650 (but band pass) . However, if you do see in your roots you can immerse them with 0.1% Toluidine blue (15 min) before mounting followed by a 5 min wash in PBS.
2) you should be able to see the cy5 spots in the bacteria, if the bacteria is present on the surface and not washed away during the procedures. You can perform this in the type of bacteria only sample to see whether the hybridization works before performing on a plant sample.
3) You can hybridize them also with an antibody dual conjugated with Alexa 647 and nanogold(5-10 nm), and if the fluorescence fails (or to double confirm the same fluorescent spot to gold particle) you can still use the reflectance mode of the confocal to image the gold particles (in this way you can also take the same sample to TEM if needed to image the gold particles).
4) immobilization of the bacteria on the surface and holding all of them during the process is the key.

Good luck
Shiv
 
At 10:11 AM 7/10/2008, you wrote:
Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
I have a user that I’ve been training on our Zeiss LSM 510-Meta.  Her samples are plant root tips (a native desert plant, “quail bush”) and she is looking for a specific type of bacteria that may be located on the surface of the roots.  To differentiate the one type of bacteria from all the others she has done FISH using CY5.  Her expectation is that these specific bacteria will only constitute a subset of the entire bacterial population, consequently we may have to look around to find them.  Wow, plant tissue certainly has a lot of non-specific background fluorescence throughout the visible range (I usually work with mammalian tissues)!
 
Is there a way to reduce the plant autofluorescence?
 
Is it even reasonable to think that we could image a small spot of FISH fluorescence with enough signal to overcome the background autofluorescence?
 
Is there a better/different way to do this?
 
Doug
 
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas W. Cromey, M.S. - Assistant Scientific Investigator
Dept. of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of Arizona
1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ  85724-5044 USA
 
office:  AHSC 4212         email: [hidden email]
voice:  520-626-2824       fax:  520-626-2097
 
http://swehsc.pharmacy.arizona.edu/exppath/
Home of: "Microscopy and Imaging Resources on the WWW"
 

Mayandi Sivaguru, PhD, PhD
Microscopy Facility Manager
8, Institute for Genomic Biology
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1206 West Gregory Dr.
Urbana, IL 61801 USA

Office: 217.333.1214
Fax: 217.244.2496
[hidden email]
http://core.igb.uiuc.edu

Holly L. AARON Holly L. AARON
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bacteria and plant roots

In reply to this post by cromey
Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi, Doug –

 

You should have your user record the autofluorescent spectra from the sample on the META. Then you can separate out the Cy5 signal from the autofluorescence using linear unmixing. This is one of the best uses for a spectral system!

 

If you want more details on how to do that, let me know.

 

Best,

 Holly

__________________

Holly L. Aaron

CRL Molecular Imaging Center

http://imaging.berkeley.edu


From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Douglas Cromey
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 8:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: bacteria and plant roots

 

I have a user that I’ve been training on our Zeiss LSM 510-Meta.  Her samples are plant root tips (a native desert plant, “quail bush”) and she is looking for a specific type of bacteria that may be located on the surface of the roots.  To differentiate the one type of bacteria from all the others she has done FISH using CY5.  Her expectation is that these specific bacteria will only constitute a subset of the entire bacterial population, consequently we may have to look around to find them.  Wow, plant tissue certainly has a lot of non-specific background fluorescence throughout the visible range (I usually work with mammalian tissues)!

 

Is there a way to reduce the plant autofluorescence?

 

Is it even reasonable to think that we could image a small spot of FISH fluorescence with enough signal to overcome the background autofluorescence?

 

Is there a better/different way to do this?

 

Doug

 

 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Douglas W. Cromey, M.S. - Assistant Scientific Investigator

Dept. of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of Arizona

1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ  85724-5044 USA

 

office:  AHSC 4212         email: [hidden email]

voice:  520-626-2824       fax:  520-626-2097

 

http://swehsc.pharmacy.arizona.edu/exppath/

Home of: "Microscopy and Imaging Resources on the WWW"