Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Dear all, For those interested, a rigorous treatment
of how to correct for z-measurements in case of a mismatch in refractive
indices can be found in the Handbook by Pawley, 3rd edition, chapter 20 by Egner
and Hell. (I believe this chapter is also in the 2nd edition of the Handbook). With regard to Esteban’s situation (see
thread ‘How to correct z distance in RI mismatch’), yesterday I
gave the suggestion to use the geometrical formula for an effective NA of
approx. 1 (i.e. half the illumination light cone). Comparing this with the
values reported in table 2 of the chapter by Egner and Esteban, a reasonable
correspondence is found for a focus depth of 15 to 20 micron (less than a
micron difference). After that the geometrical formula (with adjusted effective
NA) does not give an adequate prediction anymore. In any case, in this chapter
you can find everything needed for accurate calculations. Best regards, Kevin Kevin
Braeckmans, Ph.D. Lab.
General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy Ghent
University Harelbekestraat
72 9000
Ghent Belgium Tel:
+32 (0)9 264.80.78 Fax:
+32 (0)9 264.81.89 |
G. Esteban Fernandez |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Thanks for your persistence in finding a reference Kevin. I read that chapter in Pawley early on but didn't see any formulas that I could quickly use to get numbers for my particular application. One paper that presents z correction models that I was able to follow and make an Excel spreadsheet for is: van Elburg et al. (2007) Improved correction of axial geometrical distortion in index-mismatched fluorescent confocal microscopic images using high-aperture objective lenses. J. Microscopy 228(1):45-54. They used "rigorous electromagnetic diffraction theory" to generate numerical data (as in Egner and Hell's chapter in Pawley) and present linear and non-linear models, trimmed down to relatively simple equations, that fit the numbers. They don't actually present the rigours of the EM theory, so my mathematically simple mind wasn't confused. I don't have the expertise (or time!) to evaulate how good their models are, but their equations in my spreadsheet churned out numbers that agree with Table 20.2 and Fig. 20.10 in Pawley's book. The corrected z-stacks gave results that my user says seem accurate. If someone ever reads this post who knows more about the paper above some feedback would be appreciated. Esteban On Feb 19, 2008 1:35 AM, Kevin Braeckmans <[hidden email]> wrote: > Search the CONFOCAL archive at > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > > > > > Dear all, > > > > For those interested, a rigorous treatment of how to correct for > z-measurements in case of a mismatch in refractive indices can be found in > the Handbook by Pawley, 3rd edition, chapter 20 by Egner and Hell. (I > believe this chapter is also in the 2nd edition of the Handbook). > > > > With regard to Esteban's situation (see thread 'How to correct z distance in > RI mismatch'), yesterday I gave the suggestion to use the geometrical > formula for an effective NA of approx. 1 (i.e. half the illumination light > cone). Comparing this with the values reported in table 2 of the chapter by > Egner and Esteban, a reasonable correspondence is found for a focus depth of > 15 to 20 micron (less than a micron difference). After that the geometrical > formula (with adjusted effective NA) does not give an adequate prediction > anymore. In any case, in this chapter you can find everything needed for > accurate calculations. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Kevin > > > > Kevin Braeckmans, Ph.D. > > Lab. General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy > > Ghent University > > Harelbekestraat 72 > > 9000 Ghent > > Belgium > > Tel: +32 (0)9 264.80.78 > > Fax: +32 (0)9 264.81.89 -- G. Esteban Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Director Molecular Cytology Research Core Facility University of Missouri 1201 E. Rollins St. Columbia, MO 65211 573-882-4895 573-884-9676 fax http://www.biotech.missouri.edu/mcc/ |
Csucs Gabor |
In reply to this post by Kevin Braeckmans
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Dear All, Again a non-confocal question: In order to check the functionality of our incubator boxes we would like to purchase temperature and CO2 sensors which can be connected to a computer via USB (to perform long-term measurements). Does anyone has experience (suggestions) with such sensors? > Thanks Gabor -- Gabor Csucs Light Microscopy Centre, ETH Zurich Schafmattstrasse 18, HPM F16 CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland Web: www.lmc.ethz.ch Phone: +41 44 633 6221 Fax: +41 44 632 1298 e-mail: [hidden email] |
Nuno Moreno |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal I had never test it but I love the concept of the nova 5000. http://www.fourier-sys.com/product_sensors_nova.html Its a lovely toy that I'll buy for my kids when they grow up (for me to play of course). regards, NM Csucs Gabor wrote: > Search the CONFOCAL archive at > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal > > Dear All, > > Again a non-confocal question: In order to check the functionality of > our incubator boxes we would like to purchase temperature and CO2 > sensors which can be connected to a computer via USB (to perform > long-term measurements). Does anyone has experience (suggestions) with > such sensors? >> > Thanks Gabor > -- Nuno Moreno Cell Imaging Unit Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência http://uic.igc.gulbekian.pt http://www.igc.gulbekian.pt phone +351 214464606 fax +351 214407970 |
Chris Tully |
In reply to this post by Csucs Gabor
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Gabor,
I personally would start with Measurement Computing (http://www.measurementcomputing.com/). They make a whole range of USB based DAQ (Data AQuisition) devices. I have used some of their device in previous jobs. I know that they have devices which accept RTD or thermocouple inputs for temperature, and they may well know of a CO2 sensor that you can use with their devices. Chris Tully On Feb 19, 2008 5:28 PM, Csucs Gabor <[hidden email]> wrote: Search the CONFOCAL archive at |
Caroline Bass |
In reply to this post by Csucs Gabor
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal You might want to consider a data logger. I have used thermochron sensors, also known as ibuttons to measure core body temperature in rodents. But they are designed for use as monitoring devices. You can sterilize them, and you just set the button in the incubator and collect the data whenever you need it. Very flexible system, and it is super cheap, as low as $5 a sensor and $30 some for the usb adaptor. They also have wired solutions I believe. I don't know about CO2 but they can also keep track of humidity. Check out the websites: http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/ibutton/ibuttons/thermochron.cfm and http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/ibutton/ -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Csucs Gabor Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:29 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Temperature and CO2 sensors with USB connection Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Dear All, Again a non-confocal question: In order to check the functionality of our incubator boxes we would like to purchase temperature and CO2 sensors which can be connected to a computer via USB (to perform long-term measurements). Does anyone has experience (suggestions) with such sensors? > Thanks Gabor -- Gabor Csucs Light Microscopy Centre, ETH Zurich Schafmattstrasse 18, HPM F16 CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland Web: www.lmc.ethz.ch Phone: +41 44 633 6221 Fax: +41 44 632 1298 e-mail: [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |