Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

[Chew, Teng-Leong]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi all,

Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
https://www.janelia.org/you-janelia/conferences/frontiers-microscopy-technologies-and-strategies-bioimaging-centers-network

I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.

We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
 
Don’ts
1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
 
Do’s
1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community
 
In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.

Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.

Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.

Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!

Regards,
Leong

[Alison J. North]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear Leong,

I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the listserver
about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting that
turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments and
problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the implication
of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.  There are
many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched so far
just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't have the
time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you please
clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical core
facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our conversations a
few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got the
impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges for cores.

Thanks in advance for the clarification!
All the best,
Alison

On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:

> *****
>
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=XNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQRyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA&e=
>
> Post images on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=M4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_OJD7RutmHsBqhadM&e=  and include the link in your posting.
>
> *****
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-2Dcenters-2Dnetwork&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=QlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg&e=
>
>
>
> I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>
>
>
> We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
>
>  
>
> Don’ts
>
> 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
>
> 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
>
> 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
>
> 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
>
> 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
>
> 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
>
> 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
>
> Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
>
>  
>
> Do’s
>
> 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
>
> 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
>
> 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
>
> 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
>
> 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
>
> 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
>
> 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
>
> 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
>
> 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
>
> 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
>
> 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
>
> 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community
>
>  
>
> In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>
>
>
> Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.
>
>
>
> Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>
>
>
> Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Leong
>
>
>

--
Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
Research Associate Professor and
Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
The Rockefeller University,
1230 York Avenue,
New York,
NY 10065.
Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489

[Rosemary.White]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Yes, I was thinking that really there's nothing unique about our small facility (2 people, 4 major instruments), except that the people who use the facility are working on research projects not done elsewhere. And we're probably one of only a few facilities worldwide focussing almost entirely on plants. However, we can't compete in novelty or breadth with facilities in the US/Europe that have many more diverse instruments, facility staff, resources, etc.

And I have to say, we can all think of diverse ways to solve our bottlenecks, but they usually require additional resources of some sort, hard to come by right now. Our institution lost 20% of its staff over the last 3 years, hence staff time is our real bottleneck, it limits everything we might wish to do.

I'd be interested in a summary of this meeting, if one is produced, especially if it includes some new ideas about the various items in the "Do's" list below.

cheers,
Rosemary  
 
Dr Rosemary White
CSIRO Black Mountain
GPO Box 1700
Canberra, ACT 2601
Australia
Adjunct Prof, EH Graham Centre, CSU
& Research School of Biology, ANU
 
T 61 2 6246 5475
E [hidden email]


On 31/10/17, 9:33 am, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Alison North" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

    *****
    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
    Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
    *****
   
    Dear Leong,
   
    I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the listserver
    about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting that
    turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments and
    problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the implication
    of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.  There are
    many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched so far
    just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't have the
    time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
    cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you please
    clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical core
    facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our conversations a
    few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got the
    impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
    interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges for cores.
   
    Thanks in advance for the clarification!
    All the best,
    Alison
   
    On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
    > *****
    >
    > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    >
    > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=XNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQRyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA&e=
    >
    > Post images on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=M4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_OJD7RutmHsBqhadM&e=  and include the link in your posting.
    >
    > *****
    >
    >
    >
    > Hi all,
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
    >
    > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-2Dcenters-2Dnetwork&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=QlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg&e=
    >
    >
    >
    > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
    >
    >
    >
    > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
    >
    >  
    >
    > Don’ts
    >
    > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
    >
    > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
    >
    > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
    >
    > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
    >
    > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
    >
    > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
    >
    > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
    >
    > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
    >
    >  
    >
    > Do’s
    >
    > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
    >
    > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
    >
    > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
    >
    > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
    >
    > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
    >
    > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
    >
    > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
    >
    > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
    >
    > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
    >
    > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
    >
    > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
    >
    > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community
    >
    >  
    >
    > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
    >
    >
    >
    > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.
    >
    >
    >
    > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.
    >
    >
    >
    > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!
    >
    >
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Leong
    >
    >
    >
   
    --
    Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
    Research Associate Professor and
    Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
    The Rockefeller University,
    1230 York Avenue,
    New York,
    NY 10065.
    Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
    Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
    Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489
   

[Chew, Teng-Leong]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Alison,

Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent in haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So, to my beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.

Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for their cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the number of attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia unfortunately does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship. Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”. If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations, etc) then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have would be to look for applicants who can contribute.

Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted e-mail earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core directors, rather than excluding them. How so? Core directors face operational/technical issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem uniquely intractable. Bring those problems to the conference, let’s find common solutions. It is designed for those who really have unique experience (positive or otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic workshop wherein the “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to mix things up – some technical notes on the frontiers of imaging technologies, discussion of common problems, hands-on time and learning session about Janelia’s instruments, how to apply for instrument grants, how to brand your core, how to talk to your university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly discuss funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a voice or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a better “filtering” mechanism.

I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the first time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities. Well, Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if everyone brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest in imaging science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I just don’t think it should be a basic description of your core or common things that everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just sit passively and listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.

It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many fronts. In fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website – bring up any topic you think would interest the community. It just might get accepted.  I remain enthusiastic in answering all your questions or critiques. I do want everyone to have the best chance of coming to this conference. Don’t be shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.

Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.

Regards,
Leong



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear Leong,

I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the listserver
about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting that
turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments and
problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the implication
of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.  There are
many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched so far
just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't have the
time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you please
clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical core
facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our conversations a
few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got the
impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges for cores.

Thanks in advance for the clarification!
All the best,
Alison

On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:

> *****
>
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=XNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQRyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA&e=
>
> Post images on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=M4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_OJD7RutmHsBqhadM&e=  and include the link in your posting.
>
> *****
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-2Dcenters-2Dnetwork&d=DwIGaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=oavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ&s=QlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg&e=
>
>
>
> I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>
>
>
> We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
>
>  
>
> Don’ts
>
> 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
>
> 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
>
> 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
>
> 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
>
> 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
>
> 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
>
> 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
>
> Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
>
>  
>
> Do’s
>
> 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
>
> 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
>
> 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
>
> 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
>
> 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
>
> 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
>
> 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
>
> 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
>
> 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
>
> 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
>
> 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
>
> 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community
>
>  
>
> In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>
>
>
> Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.
>
>
>
> Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>
>
>
> Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Leong
>
>
>

--
Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
Research Associate Professor and
Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
The Rockefeller University,
1230 York Avenue,
New York,
NY 10065.
Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489

[Douglas Richardson]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

For what it's worth, the only fair method I could come up with for selecting attendees to our tissue clearing workshop was a lottery.

We've found we always have an excellent group of interesting people with a lot to offer in the discussion periods.

In addition, you've already assembled a great selection of leaders in the field in the list of invited attendees, so I don't think you'll lack for innovative people!

Good luck,

Doug

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 27, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
> https://www.janelia.org/you-janelia/conferences/frontiers-microscopy-technologies-and-strategies-bioimaging-centers-network
>
> I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>
> We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
>
> Don’ts
> 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
> 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
> 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
> 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
> 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
> 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
> 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
> Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
>
> Do’s
> 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
> 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
> 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
> 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
> 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
> 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
> 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
> 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
> 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
> 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
> 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
> 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community    
>
> In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>
> Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.
>
> Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>
> Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!
>
> Regards,
> Leong
>

[Tim Feinstein]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Q – is there any plan to publish abstracts from the meeting? I expect the discussion to be interesting and valuable for a great many people.  

Best,


Tim

Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D.



On 10/31/17, 12:02 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Chew, Teng-Leong" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

    *****
    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&reserved=0
    Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0 and include the link in your posting.
    *****
   
    Hi Alison,
   
    Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent in haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So, to my beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.
   
    Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for their cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the number of attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia unfortunately does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship. Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”. If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations, etc) then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have would be to look for applicants who can contribute.
   
    Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted e-mail earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core directors, rather than excluding them. How so? Core directors face operational/technical issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem uniquely intractable. Bring those problems to the conference, let’s find common solutions. It is designed for those who really have unique experience (positive or otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic workshop wherein the “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to mix things up – some technical notes on the frontiers of imaging technologies, discussion of common problems, hands-on time and learning session about Janelia’s instruments, how to apply for instrument grants, how to brand your core, how to talk to your university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly discuss funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a voice or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a better “filtering” mechanism.
   
    I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the first time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities. Well, Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if everyone brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest in imaging science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I just don’t think it should be a basic description of your core or common things that everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just sit passively and listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.
   
    It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many fronts. In fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website – bring up any topic you think would interest the community. It just might get accepted.  I remain enthusiastic in answering all your questions or critiques. I do want everyone to have the best chance of coming to this conference. Don’t be shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.
   
    Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.
   
    Regards,
    Leong
   
   
   
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
    Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
    Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
    To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
    Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers
   
    *****
    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&reserved=0
    Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0 and include the link in your posting.
    *****
   
    Dear Leong,
   
    I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the listserver
    about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting that
    turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments and
    problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the implication
    of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.  There are
    many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched so far
    just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't have the
    time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
    cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you please
    clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical core
    facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our conversations a
    few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got the
    impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
    interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges for cores.
   
    Thanks in advance for the clarification!
    All the best,
    Alison
   
    On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
    > *****
    >
    > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    >
    > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DXNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQRyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=WEoq3iM34hFB8kYxWxRV3w%2BfqqTpftFrHXo9jF7KBnk%3D&reserved=0=
    >
    > Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.imgur.com%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DM4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_OJD7RutmHsBqhadM%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=mtls5RndjdCHfKZUDZuWA4L5dJVjEhsPjL5U7cp4cTw%3D&reserved=0=  and include the link in your posting.
    >
    > *****
    >
    >
    >
    > Hi all,
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
    >
    > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-2Dcenters-2Dnetwork%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DQlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=48YtEhmqRJXE%2FnEvy32L5%2BfjRmHWsuCvFw5vdfmSFN8%3D&reserved=0=
    >
    >
    >
    > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
    >
    >
    >
    > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
    >
    >  
    >
    > Don’ts
    >
    > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
    >
    > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
    >
    > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
    >
    > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
    >
    > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
    >
    > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
    >
    > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
    >
    > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
    >
    >  
    >
    > Do’s
    >
    > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
    >
    > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
    >
    > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
    >
    > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
    >
    > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
    >
    > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
    >
    > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
    >
    > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
    >
    > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
    >
    > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
    >
    > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
    >
    > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community
    >
    >  
    >
    > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
    >
    >
    >
    > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.
    >
    >
    >
    > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.
    >
    >
    >
    > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!
    >
    >
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Leong
    >
    >
    >
   
    --
    Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
    Research Associate Professor and
    Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
    The Rockefeller University,
    1230 York Avenue,
    New York,
    NY 10065.
    Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
    Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
    Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489
   
   
   

[Chew, Teng-Leong]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Tim,

Yes, there will be an abstract book, in PDF.

I am not sure if it will capture the full flavor though as there will be a lot of hands-on or up-close experience with the AIC instruments and also the instrument design & fabrication center here.

We are trying to figure some other alternatives out. Stay tuned!

Regards,
Leong

On 10/31/17, 9:07 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Feinstein, Timothy N" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

    *****
    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
    Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
    *****
   
    Q – is there any plan to publish abstracts from the meeting? I expect the discussion to be interesting and valuable for a great many people.  
   
    Best,
   
   
    Tim
   
    Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D.
   
   
   
    On 10/31/17, 12:02 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Chew, Teng-Leong" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
   
        *****
        To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
        https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&reserved=0
        Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0 and include the link in your posting.
        *****
       
        Hi Alison,
       
        Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent in haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So, to my beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.
       
        Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for their cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the number of attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia unfortunately does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship. Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”. If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations, etc) then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have would be to look for applicants who can contribute.
       
        Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted e-mail earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core directors, rather than excluding them. How so? Core directors face operational/technical issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem uniquely intractable. Bring those problems to the conference, let’s find common solutions. It is designed for those who really have unique experience (positive or otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic workshop wherein the “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to mix things up – some technical notes on the frontiers of imaging technologies, discussion of common problems, hands-on time and learning session about Janelia’s instruments, how to apply for instrument grants, how to brand your core, how to talk to your university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly discuss funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a voice or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a better “filtering” mechanism.
       
        I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the first time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities. Well, Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if everyone brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest in imaging science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I just don’t think it should be a basic description of your core or common things that everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just sit passively and listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.
       
        It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many fronts. In fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website – bring up any topic you think would interest the community. It just might get accepted.  I remain enthusiastic in answering all your questions or critiques. I do want everyone to have the best chance of coming to this conference. Don’t be shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.
       
        Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.
       
        Regards,
        Leong
       
       
       
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
        Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
        Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
        To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
        Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers
       
        *****
        To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
        https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&reserved=0
        Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0 and include the link in your posting.
        *****
       
        Dear Leong,
       
        I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the listserver
        about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting that
        turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments and
        problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the implication
        of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.  There are
        many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched so far
        just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't have the
        time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
        cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you please
        clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical core
        facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our conversations a
        few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got the
        impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
        interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges for cores.
       
        Thanks in advance for the clarification!
        All the best,
        Alison
       
        On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
        > *****
        >
        > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
        >
        > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DXNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQRyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=WEoq3iM34hFB8kYxWxRV3w%2BfqqTpftFrHXo9jF7KBnk%3D&reserved=0=
        >
        > Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.imgur.com%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DM4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_OJD7RutmHsBqhadM%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=mtls5RndjdCHfKZUDZuWA4L5dJVjEhsPjL5U7cp4cTw%3D&reserved=0=  and include the link in your posting.
        >
        > *****
        >
        >
        >
        > Hi all,
        >
        >
        >
        > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this meeting:
        >
        > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-2Dcenters-2Dnetwork%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DQlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=48YtEhmqRJXE%2FnEvy32L5%2BfjRmHWsuCvFw5vdfmSFN8%3D&reserved=0=
        >
        >
        >
        > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
        >
        >
        >
        > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following do’s and don’ts:
        >
        >  
        >
        > Don’ts
        >
        > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going to get accepted.
        >
        > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20 labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
        >
        > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
        >
        > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special for you?
        >
        > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
        >
        > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
        >
        > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
        >
        > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
        >
        >  
        >
        > Do’s
        >
        > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
        >
        > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges – biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee structure etc
        >
        > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive open access
        >
        > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you would like these problems solved strategically
        >
        > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical abstract)
        >
        > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for technical abstract)
        >
        > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core (for technical abstract)
        >
        > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get to a company demo site is not unique.
        >
        > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to hear about it.
        >
        > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
        >
        > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
        >
        > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local alliance to better serve the community
        >
        >  
        >
        > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
        >
        >
        >
        > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not listed, bring it up.
        >
        >
        >
        > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues. Regular talks are only 15 min each.
        >
        >
        >
        > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar faces and meeting new colleagues!
        >
        >
        >
        > Regards,
        >
        > Leong
        >
        >
        >
       
        --
        Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
        Research Associate Professor and
        Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
        The Rockefeller University,
        1230 York Avenue,
        New York,
        NY 10065.
        Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
        Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
        Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489
       
       
       
   
   

[Craig Brideau]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Leong et al, I think that the greatest problems faced by core facilities
are social and political, rather than technical. Janelia is amazing at
solving practical imaging problems through engineering, and has spearheaded
the use of many amazing techniques. For most core managers, however, their
concerns more revolve around keeping their staff paid and the equipment
running. Core facilities seem glamorous, but tend to be chronically
underfunded when it comes to maintaining a cadre of high-quality staff.
Host organisations seem all too willing to fund the acquisition of the
latest, greatest technology but usually don't consider staffing
requirements, or undervalue them. In my career, I have all too often seen
very expensive equipment gathering dust for want of personnel to maintain
or operate it. I would suggest that the most valuable information for core
managers would be strategies to convince stakeholders to invest more
appropriately in training and staff. This is a tough sell as it doesn't
directly lead to high impact papers getting published, but it provides the
foundation upon which such papers are built. Getting this across to the
purse-string holders is difficult, and I would like to hear how core
managers went about this.

Craig

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chew, Teng-Leong <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, there will be an abstract book, in PDF.
>
> I am not sure if it will capture the full flavor though as there will be a
> lot of hands-on or up-close experience with the AIC instruments and also
> the instrument design & fabrication center here.
>
> We are trying to figure some other alternatives out. Stay tuned!
>
> Regards,
> Leong
>
> On 10/31/17, 9:07 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Feinstein,
> Timothy N" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>     *****
>     To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>     http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>     Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
>     *****
>
>     Q – is there any plan to publish abstracts from the meeting? I expect
> the discussion to be interesting and valuable for a great many people.
>
>     Best,
>
>
>     Tim
>
>     Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D.
>
>
>
>     On 10/31/17, 12:02 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Chew,
> Teng-Leong" <[hidden email] on behalf of
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Hi Alison,
>
>         Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent in
> haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So, to my
> beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.
>
>         Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about
> conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for their
> cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the number of
> attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia unfortunately
> does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship.
> Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”.
> If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as
> first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations, etc)
> then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have would be
> to look for applicants who can contribute.
>
>         Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted e-mail
> earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core directors, rather
> than excluding them. How so? Core directors face operational/technical
> issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem uniquely intractable. Bring
> those problems to the conference, let’s find common solutions. It is
> designed for those who really have unique experience (positive or
> otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic workshop wherein the
> “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to mix things up – some
> technical notes on the frontiers of imaging technologies, discussion of
> common problems, hands-on time and learning session about Janelia’s
> instruments, how to apply for instrument grants, how to brand your core,
> how to talk to your university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly
> discuss funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In
> that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a voice
> or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a
> better “filtering” mechanism.
>
>         I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the first
> time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities. Well,
> Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if everyone
> brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest in imaging
> science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I just don’t think
> it should be a basic description of your core or common things that
> everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just sit passively and
> listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.
>
>         It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many fronts. In
> fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website – bring up any topic
> you think would interest the community. It just might get accepted.  I
> remain enthusiastic in answering all your questions or critiques. I do want
> everyone to have the best chance of coming to this conference. Don’t be
> shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.
>
>         Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.
>
>         Regards,
>         Leong
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
>         Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email].
> EDU>
>         Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
>         To: "[hidden email]" <
> [hidden email]>
>         Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Dear Leong,
>
>         I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the
> listserver
>         about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting
> that
>         turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments
> and
>         problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the
> implication
>         of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.
> There are
>         many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched
> so far
>         just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't
> have the
>         time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
>         cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you
> please
>         clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical
> core
>         facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our
> conversations a
>         few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got
> the
>         impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
>         interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges
> for cores.
>
>         Thanks in advance for the clarification!
>         All the best,
>         Alison
>
>         On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
>         > *****
>         >
>         > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttp-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy%26d%
> 3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-
> d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DXNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQ
> RyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=WEoq3iM34hFB8kYxWxRV3w%2BfqqTpftFrHXo9jF7KBnk%3D&
> reserved=0=
>         >
>         > Post images on https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.
> proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.imgur.com%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%
> 3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-
> d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DM4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_
> OJD7RutmHsBqhadM%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=mtls5RndjdCHfKZUDZuWA4L5dJVjEhsPjL5U7cp4cTw%3D&reserved=0=
> and include the link in your posting.
>         >
>         > *****
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this
> meeting:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttps-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_
> frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-
> 2Dcenters-2Dnetwork%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK
> 1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%
> 3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%
> 3DQlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg%26e&data=01%
> 7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%
> 7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=48YtEhmqRJXE%2FnEvy32L5%
> 2BfjRmHWsuCvFw5vdfmSFN8%3D&reserved=0=
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and
> based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would
> clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute
> something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following
> do’s and don’ts:
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Don’ts
>         >
>         > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core
> facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5
> confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going
> to get accepted.
>         >
>         > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20
> labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
>         >
>         > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of
> storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
>         >
>         > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage
> for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special
> for you?
>         >
>         > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in
> one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
>         >
>         > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the
> challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you
> could have more money is not a strategic solution.
>         >
>         > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core
> facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
>         >
>         > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are
> not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you
> don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit
> these kinds of abstracts.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Do’s
>         >
>         > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique
> compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
>         >
>         > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges –
> biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee
> structure etc
>         >
>         > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you
> deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive
> open access
>         >
>         > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you
> would like these problems solved strategically
>         >
>         > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical
> abstract)
>         >
>         > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for
> technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core
> (for technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with
> manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get
> to a company demo site is not unique.
>         >
>         > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a
> microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing
> a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the
> other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local
> attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how
> to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to
> hear about it.
>         >
>         > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
>         >
>         > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the
> university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
>         >
>         > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local
> alliance to better serve the community
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to
> contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging
> centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology
> dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or
> experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine
> efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not
> listed, bring it up.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues.
> Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am
> happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar
> faces and meeting new colleagues!
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         >
>         > Leong
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>         --
>         Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
>         Research Associate Professor and
>         Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
>         The Rockefeller University,
>         1230 York Avenue,
>         New York,
>         NY 10065.
>         Tel: office     ++ 212 327 7488
>         Tel: lab        ++ 212 327 7486
>         Fax:            ++ 212 327 7489
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Indig, Fred (NIH/NIA/IRP) [E]]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****


Here here on the comments by Alison, Craig and others.


Still unclear what is the purpose of the Janelia Conference- to showcase a few sexy cores and experimental microscopy rigs (which no one else has),

or to have a serious discussion on the problems and issues facing cores with emphasis on solutions?


We have MAD SSCi, but the microscopy core presence was rather minimal in last couple of meetings that I had attended.


Fred


Fred E. Indig, Ph.D.

Head, Confocal Imaging Facility


Biomedical Research Center (BRC) Rm 8B135

National Institute on Aging/NIH

251 Bayview Blvd.

Baltimore, MD  21224-6825


Tel. [phone]

Fax  [phone]

[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>


________________________________
From: Craig Brideau <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:17:26 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
LISTSERV 16.0 - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY List at LISTS.UMN.EDU<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy>
lists.umn.edu
[hidden email]: listserv archives. confocalmicroscopy



Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Imgur_logo.svg/150px-Imgur_logo.svg.png]<http://www.imgur.com/>

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://www.imgur.com/>
www.imgur.com
Imgur is the best place to share and enjoy the most awesome images on the Internet. Every day, millions of people use Imgur to be entertained and inspired by funny ...



*****

Leong et al, I think that the greatest problems faced by core facilities
are social and political, rather than technical. Janelia is amazing at
solving practical imaging problems through engineering, and has spearheaded
the use of many amazing techniques. For most core managers, however, their
concerns more revolve around keeping their staff paid and the equipment
running. Core facilities seem glamorous, but tend to be chronically
underfunded when it comes to maintaining a cadre of high-quality staff.
Host organisations seem all too willing to fund the acquisition of the
latest, greatest technology but usually don't consider staffing
requirements, or undervalue them. In my career, I have all too often seen
very expensive equipment gathering dust for want of personnel to maintain
or operate it. I would suggest that the most valuable information for core
managers would be strategies to convince stakeholders to invest more
appropriately in training and staff. This is a tough sell as it doesn't
directly lead to high impact papers getting published, but it provides the
foundation upon which such papers are built. Getting this across to the
purse-string holders is difficult, and I would like to hear how core
managers went about this.

Craig

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chew, Teng-Leong <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
LISTSERV 16.0 - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY List at LISTS.UMN.EDU<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy>
lists.umn.edu
[hidden email]: listserv archives. confocalmicroscopy



> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Imgur_logo.svg/150px-Imgur_logo.svg.png]<http://www.imgur.com/>

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://www.imgur.com/>
www.imgur.com
Imgur is the best place to share and enjoy the most awesome images on the Internet. Every day, millions of people use Imgur to be entertained and inspired by funny ...

> *****
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, there will be an abstract book, in PDF.
>
> I am not sure if it will capture the full flavor though as there will be a
> lot of hands-on or up-close experience with the AIC instruments and also
> the instrument design & fabrication center here.
>
> We are trying to figure some other alternatives out. Stay tuned!
>
> Regards,
> Leong
>
> On 10/31/17, 9:07 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Feinstein,
> Timothy N" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>     *****
>     To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>     http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy

LISTSERV 16.0 - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY List at LISTS.UMN.EDU<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy>
lists.umn.edu
[hidden email]: listserv archives. confocalmicroscopy



>     Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Imgur_logo.svg/150px-Imgur_logo.svg.png]<http://www.imgur.com/>

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://www.imgur.com/>
www.imgur.com
Imgur is the best place to share and enjoy the most awesome images on the Internet. Every day, millions of people use Imgur to be entertained and inspired by funny ...

> posting.
>     *****
>
>     Q – is there any plan to publish abstracts from the meeting? I expect
> the discussion to be interesting and valuable for a great many people.
>
>     Best,
>
>
>     Tim
>
>     Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D.
>
>
>
>     On 10/31/17, 12:02 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Chew,
> Teng-Leong" <[hidden email] on behalf of
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Hi Alison,
>
>         Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent in
> haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So, to my
> beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.
>
>         Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about
> conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for their
> cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the number of
> attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia unfortunately
> does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship.
> Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”.
> If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as
> first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations, etc)
> then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have would be
> to look for applicants who can contribute.
>
>         Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted e-mail
> earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core directors, rather
> than excluding them. How so? Core directors face operational/technical
> issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem uniquely intractable. Bring
> those problems to the conference, let’s find common solutions. It is
> designed for those who really have unique experience (positive or
> otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic workshop wherein the
> “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to mix things up – some
> technical notes on the frontiers of imaging technologies, discussion of
> common problems, hands-on time and learning session about Janelia’s
> instruments, how to apply for instrument grants, how to brand your core,
> how to talk to your university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly
> discuss funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In
> that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a voice
> or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a
> better “filtering” mechanism.
>
>         I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the first
> time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities. Well,
> Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if everyone
> brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest in imaging
> science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I just don’t think
> it should be a basic description of your core or common things that
> everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just sit passively and
> listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.
>
>         It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many fronts. In
> fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website – bring up any topic
> you think would interest the community. It just might get accepted.  I
> remain enthusiastic in answering all your questions or critiques. I do want
> everyone to have the best chance of coming to this conference. Don’t be
> shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.
>
>         Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.
>
>         Regards,
>         Leong
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
>         Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email].
> EDU>
>         Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
>         To: "[hidden email]" <
> [hidden email]>
>         Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Dear Leong,
>
>         I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the
> listserver
>         about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting
> that
>         turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments
> and
>         problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the
> implication
>         of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.
> There are
>         many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched
> so far
>         just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't
> have the
>         time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
>         cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you
> please
>         clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical
> core
>         facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our
> conversations a
>         few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got
> the
>         impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
>         interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges
> for cores.
>
>         Thanks in advance for the clarification!
>         All the best,
>         Alison
>
>         On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
>         > *****
>         >
>         > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttp-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy%26d%
> 3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-
> d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DXNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQ
> RyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=WEoq3iM34hFB8kYxWxRV3w%2BfqqTpftFrHXo9jF7KBnk%3D&
> reserved=0=
>         >
>         > Post images on https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.
> proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.imgur.com%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%
> 3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-
> d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DM4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_
> OJD7RutmHsBqhadM%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=mtls5RndjdCHfKZUDZuWA4L5dJVjEhsPjL5U7cp4cTw%3D&reserved=0=
> and include the link in your posting.
>         >
>         > *****
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this
> meeting:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttps-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_
> frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-
> 2Dcenters-2Dnetwork%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK
> 1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%
> 3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%
> 3DQlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg%26e&data=01%
> 7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%
> 7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=48YtEhmqRJXE%2FnEvy32L5%
> 2BfjRmHWsuCvFw5vdfmSFN8%3D&reserved=0=
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and
> based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would
> clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute
> something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following
> do’s and don’ts:
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Don’ts
>         >
>         > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core
> facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5
> confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going
> to get accepted.
>         >
>         > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20
> labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
>         >
>         > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of
> storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
>         >
>         > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage
> for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special
> for you?
>         >
>         > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in
> one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
>         >
>         > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the
> challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you
> could have more money is not a strategic solution.
>         >
>         > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core
> facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
>         >
>         > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are
> not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you
> don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit
> these kinds of abstracts.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Do’s
>         >
>         > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique
> compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
>         >
>         > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges –
> biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee
> structure etc
>         >
>         > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you
> deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive
> open access
>         >
>         > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you
> would like these problems solved strategically
>         >
>         > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical
> abstract)
>         >
>         > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for
> technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core
> (for technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with
> manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get
> to a company demo site is not unique.
>         >
>         > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a
> microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing
> a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the
> other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local
> attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how
> to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to
> hear about it.
>         >
>         > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
>         >
>         > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the
> university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
>         >
>         > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local
> alliance to better serve the community
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to
> contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging
> centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology
> dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or
> experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine
> efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not
> listed, bring it up.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues.
> Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am
> happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar
> faces and meeting new colleagues!
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         >
>         > Leong
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>         --
>         Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
>         Research Associate Professor and
>         Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
>         The Rockefeller University,
>         1230 York Avenue,
>         New York,
>         NY 10065.
>         Tel: office     ++ 212 327 7488
>         Tel: lab        ++ 212 327 7486
>         Fax:            ++ 212 327 7489
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Periasamy, Ammasi (ap3t)-2]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

I 100% agree with Craig's point of view. The success story of the Facilities or Center in the university set up is based on the intuitional support to keep the staffs to run the facility. Janelia is completely a different operational set up compared to the university.
The manager has no financial power to run the facility. It is possible that if  the manager or the center directors have the resources to write their own research grants to run the facility.
Ammasi


Dr. Ammasi Periasamy
Professor & Center Director,
WM Keck Center for Cellular Imaging,
Departments of Biology and Biomedical Engineering,
Univeristy of Virginia,
409 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.

http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/people/profile/ap3t
Phone: [phone] or 982-4869
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [hidden email]

FRET/FLIM Workshop-March 5-9, 2018: http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/workshop 



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Craig Brideau
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:17 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Leong et al, I think that the greatest problems faced by core facilities are social and political, rather than technical. Janelia is amazing at solving practical imaging problems through engineering, and has spearheaded the use of many amazing techniques. For most core managers, however, their concerns more revolve around keeping their staff paid and the equipment running. Core facilities seem glamorous, but tend to be chronically underfunded when it comes to maintaining a cadre of high-quality staff.
Host organisations seem all too willing to fund the acquisition of the latest, greatest technology but usually don't consider staffing requirements, or undervalue them. In my career, I have all too often seen very expensive equipment gathering dust for want of personnel to maintain or operate it. I would suggest that the most valuable information for core managers would be strategies to convince stakeholders to invest more appropriately in training and staff. This is a tough sell as it doesn't directly lead to high impact papers getting published, but it provides the foundation upon which such papers are built. Getting this across to the purse-string holders is difficult, and I would like to hear how core managers went about this.

Craig

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chew, Teng-Leong <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, there will be an abstract book, in PDF.
>
> I am not sure if it will capture the full flavor though as there will
> be a lot of hands-on or up-close experience with the AIC instruments
> and also the instrument design & fabrication center here.
>
> We are trying to figure some other alternatives out. Stay tuned!
>
> Regards,
> Leong
>
> On 10/31/17, 9:07 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of
> Feinstein, Timothy N" <[hidden email] on behalf of
> [hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>     *****
>     To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>     http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>     Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
>     *****
>
>     Q – is there any plan to publish abstracts from the meeting? I
> expect the discussion to be interesting and valuable for a great many people.
>
>     Best,
>
>
>     Tim
>
>     Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D.
>
>
>
>     On 10/31/17, 12:02 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of
> Chew, Teng-Leong" <[hidden email] on behalf of
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserv
> ed=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Hi Alison,
>
>         Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent
> in haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So,
> to my beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.
>
>         Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about
> conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for
> their cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the
> number of attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia
> unfortunately does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship.
> Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”.
> If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as
> first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations,
> etc) then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have
> would be to look for applicants who can contribute.
>
>         Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted
> e-mail earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core
> directors, rather than excluding them. How so? Core directors face
> operational/technical issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem
> uniquely intractable. Bring those problems to the conference, let’s
> find common solutions. It is designed for those who really have unique
> experience (positive or otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic
> workshop wherein the “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to
> mix things up – some technical notes on the frontiers of imaging
> technologies, discussion of common problems, hands-on time and
> learning session about Janelia’s instruments, how to apply for
> instrument grants, how to brand your core, how to talk to your
> university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly discuss
> funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In
> that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a
> voice or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a better “filtering” mechanism.
>
>         I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the
> first time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities.
> Well, Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if
> everyone brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest
> in imaging science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I
> just don’t think it should be a basic description of your core or
> common things that everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just
> sit passively and listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.
>
>         It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many
> fronts. In fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website –
> bring up any topic you think would interest the community. It just
> might get accepted.  I remain enthusiastic in answering all your
> questions or critiques. I do want everyone to have the best chance of
> coming to this conference. Don’t be shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.
>
>         Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.
>
>         Regards,
>         Leong
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Confocal Microscopy List
> <[hidden email]>
> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
>         Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email].
> EDU>
>         Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
>         To: "[hidden email]" <
> [hidden email]>
>         Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some
> pointers
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserv
> ed=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Dear Leong,
>
>         I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the
> listserver
>         about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a
> meeting that
>         turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what
> instruments and
>         problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the
> implication
>         of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.
> There are
>         many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are
> stretched so far
>         just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't
> have the
>         time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
>         cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you
> please
>         clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more
> typical core
>         facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our
> conversations a
>         few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I
> got the
>         impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
>         interest in networking and finding solutions to common
> challenges for cores.
>
>         Thanks in advance for the clarification!
>         All the best,
>         Alison
>
>         On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
>         > *****
>         >
>         > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttp-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy%26d%
> 3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uW
> Ib- d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DXNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQ
> RyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=WEoq3iM34hFB8kYxWxRV3w%2BfqqTpftFrHXo9jF7KBnk%3D&
> reserved=0=
>         >
>         > Post images on https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.
> proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.imgur.com%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26
> c% 3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uW
> Ib- d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DM4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_
> OJD7RutmHsBqhadM%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=mtls5RndjdCHfKZUDZuWA4L5dJVjEhsPjL5U7cp4cTw%3D&reserved
> =0=
> and include the link in your posting.
>         >
>         > *****
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this
> meeting:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttps-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_
> frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-
> 2Dcenters-2Dnetwork%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK
> 1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%
> 3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%
> 3DQlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg%26e&data=01%
> 7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%
> 7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=48YtEhmqRJXE%2FnEvy32L5%
> 2BfjRmHWsuCvFw5vdfmSFN8%3D&reserved=0=
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and
> based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I
> would clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute
> something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the
> following do’s and don’ts:
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Don’ts
>         >
>         > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core
> facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have
> 5 confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not
> going to get accepted.
>         >
>         > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20
> labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
>         >
>         > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of
> storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
>         >
>         > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage
> for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something
> special for you?
>         >
>         > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in
> one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
>         >
>         > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the
> challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement.
> Wishing you could have more money is not a strategic solution.
>         >
>         > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core
> facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
>         >
>         > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you
> are not contributing anything new if you say something like the above.
> If you don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days,
> don’t submit these kinds of abstracts.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Do’s
>         >
>         > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique
> compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
>         >
>         > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges –
> biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable
> fee structure etc
>         >
>         > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you
> deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer
> extensive open access
>         >
>         > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you
> would like these problems solved strategically
>         >
>         > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical
> abstract)
>         >
>         > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for
> technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core
> (for technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with
> manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your
> users get to a company demo site is not unique.
>         >
>         > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a
> microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique,
> organizing a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not
> unique. On the other hand, if you run a world-class workshop
> (accessible to non-local
> attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or
> how to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to
> want to hear about it.
>         >
>         > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
>         >
>         > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the
> university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
>         >
>         > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local
> alliance to better serve the community
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique
> to contribute as we begin to build up an international community of
> imaging centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for
> funding, technology dissemination. You should show that you have
> something (expertise or
> experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate
> routine efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues
> not listed, bring it up.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues.
> Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am
> happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar
> faces and meeting new colleagues!
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         >
>         > Leong
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>         --
>         Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
>         Research Associate Professor and
>         Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
>         The Rockefeller University,
>         1230 York Avenue,
>         New York,
>         NY 10065.
>         Tel: office     ++ 212 327 7488
>         Tel: lab        ++ 212 327 7486
>         Fax:            ++ 212 327 7489
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Chew, Teng-Leong]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi all,

Funding (either internal or external) will indeed be an important topic at this conference. As I have mentioned, not only will shared instrumentation grant strategy be discussed, I am hoping to also discuss the strategy on how to leverage S10 to bolster imaging centers, how to talk about support with your institutional leaders etc. For the international attendees, I also understand that this is a bit US-centric. I think exchanging notes about how everyone work under their local constraints would be quite inspiring. Craig brought up a very important point –that funding agencies and institutions care more about shinny toys than about staffing the equipment with real talents. These seem like intractable issues that face almost everyone, everywhere. This is the kind of discussion we should have. I think as a group we can come up with a memorandum (or a paper) to advise those who hold the purse strings.

Fred asked: “Still unclear what is the purpose of the Janelia Conference- to showcase a few sexy cores and experimental microscopy rigs (which no one else has), or to have a serious discussion on the problems and issues facing cores with emphasis on solutions?”

Both imaging technologies and problems and issues facing cores will be covered. They shouldn’t have to be mutually exclusive topics. I think your impression about the technology talks is perhaps a bit misguided. The reasons why some of the instruments or technologies (scopes/probes/algorithms) are showcased is because they represent the upcoming tools that will at some point be at your facility. Not of all them will be suitable, but having advance knowledge of these would help with your planning (data handling, sample prep etc). There are also technologies (such as methods, probes and algorithms) that are pretty much ready to be disseminated, and those will be covered as well. Knowing the implications and challenges of these emerging technologies will help us anticipate what kind of support/funding/staff we may have to request in the future as soon they become commercially available.  

Hope this helps.

Best,
Leong




-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> on behalf of "Indig, Fred (NIH/NIA/IRP) [E]" <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 11:39 AM
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****


Here here on the comments by Alison, Craig and others.


Still unclear what is the purpose of the Janelia Conference- to showcase a few sexy cores and experimental microscopy rigs (which no one else has),

or to have a serious discussion on the problems and issues facing cores with emphasis on solutions?


We have MAD SSCi, but the microscopy core presence was rather minimal in last couple of meetings that I had attended.


Fred


Fred E. Indig, Ph.D.

Head, Confocal Imaging Facility


Biomedical Research Center (BRC) Rm 8B135

National Institute on Aging/NIH

251 Bayview Blvd.

Baltimore, MD  21224-6825


Tel. [phone]

Fax  [phone]

[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>


________________________________
From: Craig Brideau <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:17:26 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
LISTSERV 16.0 - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY List at LISTS.UMN.EDU<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy>
lists.umn.edu
[hidden email]: listserv archives. confocalmicroscopy



Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Imgur_logo.svg/150px-Imgur_logo.svg.png]<http://www.imgur.com/>

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://www.imgur.com/>
www.imgur.com
Imgur is the best place to share and enjoy the most awesome images on the Internet. Every day, millions of people use Imgur to be entertained and inspired by funny ...



*****

Leong et al, I think that the greatest problems faced by core facilities
are social and political, rather than technical. Janelia is amazing at
solving practical imaging problems through engineering, and has spearheaded
the use of many amazing techniques. For most core managers, however, their
concerns more revolve around keeping their staff paid and the equipment
running. Core facilities seem glamorous, but tend to be chronically
underfunded when it comes to maintaining a cadre of high-quality staff.
Host organisations seem all too willing to fund the acquisition of the
latest, greatest technology but usually don't consider staffing
requirements, or undervalue them. In my career, I have all too often seen
very expensive equipment gathering dust for want of personnel to maintain
or operate it. I would suggest that the most valuable information for core
managers would be strategies to convince stakeholders to invest more
appropriately in training and staff. This is a tough sell as it doesn't
directly lead to high impact papers getting published, but it provides the
foundation upon which such papers are built. Getting this across to the
purse-string holders is difficult, and I would like to hear how core
managers went about this.

Craig

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chew, Teng-Leong <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
LISTSERV 16.0 - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY List at LISTS.UMN.EDU<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy>
lists.umn.edu
[hidden email]: listserv archives. confocalmicroscopy



> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Imgur_logo.svg/150px-Imgur_logo.svg.png]<http://www.imgur.com/>

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://www.imgur.com/>
www.imgur.com
Imgur is the best place to share and enjoy the most awesome images on the Internet. Every day, millions of people use Imgur to be entertained and inspired by funny ...

> *****
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, there will be an abstract book, in PDF.
>
> I am not sure if it will capture the full flavor though as there will be a
> lot of hands-on or up-close experience with the AIC instruments and also
> the instrument design & fabrication center here.
>
> We are trying to figure some other alternatives out. Stay tuned!
>
> Regards,
> Leong
>
> On 10/31/17, 9:07 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Feinstein,
> Timothy N" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>     *****
>     To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>     http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy

LISTSERV 16.0 - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY List at LISTS.UMN.EDU<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy>
lists.umn.edu
[hidden email]: listserv archives. confocalmicroscopy



>     Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Imgur_logo.svg/150px-Imgur_logo.svg.png]<http://www.imgur.com/>

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet<http://www.imgur.com/>
www.imgur.com
Imgur is the best place to share and enjoy the most awesome images on the Internet. Every day, millions of people use Imgur to be entertained and inspired by funny ...

> posting.
>     *****
>
>     Q – is there any plan to publish abstracts from the meeting? I expect
> the discussion to be interesting and valuable for a great many people.
>
>     Best,
>
>
>     Tim
>
>     Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D.
>
>
>
>     On 10/31/17, 12:02 AM, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Chew,
> Teng-Leong" <[hidden email] on behalf of
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Hi Alison,
>
>         Thanks for your question. Upon re-reading my last e-mail, sent in
> haste, I realize that it reeks of arrogance and condescension. So, to my
> beloved imaging community, my sincere apology.
>
>         Please allow me to address some misunderstandings about
> conferences in Janelia in general. Many have volunteered to pay for their
> cost of attending the conference and asked us to increase the number of
> attendees. While the enthusiasm is heart-warming, Janelia unfortunately
> does not have mechanism to accept cash/credit card/commercial sponsorship.
> Another reason is because there are limited rooms in the Janelia “hotel”.
> If we start rejecting people based on poor reasons (such as
> first-come-first-serve, lack of expertise, geographical locations, etc)
> then it will be truly unfair to all. So the only mechanism I have would be
> to look for applicants who can contribute.
>
>         Contrary to the impression conveyed by my poorly crafted e-mail
> earlier, the conference is aimed to empower busy core directors, rather
> than excluding them. How so? Core directors face operational/technical
> issues daily. Sometimes these problems seem uniquely intractable. Bring
> those problems to the conference, let’s find common solutions. It is
> designed for those who really have unique experience (positive or
> otherwise). While many would prefer a didactic workshop wherein the
> “experts” talk while the rest listen, I like to mix things up – some
> technical notes on the frontiers of imaging technologies, discussion of
> common problems, hands-on time and learning session about Janelia’s
> instruments, how to apply for instrument grants, how to brand your core,
> how to talk to your university leadership, as well as opportunity to openly
> discuss funding gap with representatives from various funding agencies. In
> that sense, this conference is unique. I just want everyone who has a voice
> or anything to share with the community to attend – I cannot think of a
> better “filtering” mechanism.
>
>         I frankly do not know if the format will work. This is the first
> time we have ever run a conference solely for core facilities. Well,
> Janelia is never risk-averse. This should be a lot of fun if everyone
> brings something to the table – be it the latest and greatest in imaging
> science, or a stubborn and tricky problem you encounter. I just don’t think
> it should be a basic description of your core or common things that
> everyone is doing. I also don’t want anyone to just sit passively and
> listen. Let’s take this opportunity to help shape the community.
>
>         It is a difficult agenda to describe, as it covers many fronts. In
> fact, I keep the door ajar on the conference website – bring up any topic
> you think would interest the community. It just might get accepted.  I
> remain enthusiastic in answering all your questions or critiques. I do want
> everyone to have the best chance of coming to this conference. Don’t be
> shy, if you are still confused by my rambling, just e-mail me.
>
>         Again, please pardon the tone of my previous e-mail.
>
>         Regards,
>         Leong
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
> on behalf of Alison North <[hidden email]>
>         Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email].
> EDU>
>         Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM
>         To: "[hidden email]" <
> [hidden email]>
>         Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers
>
>         *****
>         To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.umn.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FA0%
> 3Dconfocalmicroscopy&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=rk%2BE9MsA4WmeVs4w53a9lAP%2FQR1JSmJ%2FLiU32XFsk0Q%3D&
> reserved=0
>         Post images on https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imgur.com&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=c8iCPtEAJOs81Y%2FvVfxpw0Wrg6Gd4txWJO4Ydr1vlIE%3D&reserved=0
> and include the link in your posting.
>         *****
>
>         Dear Leong,
>
>         I was a bit taken aback by this most recent message to the
> listserver
>         about the upcoming Janelia meeting.  I agree 100% that a meeting
> that
>         turns into a whingefest or a simple comparison of what instruments
> and
>         problems people have would be utterly tedious.  However, the
> implication
>         of your list of "do's" for the abstract seems rather elitist.
> There are
>         many of us who run large, busy core facilities who are stretched
> so far
>         just trying to keep our heads above water that we simply don't
> have the
>         time or the resources to attempt to achieve something unique or
>         cutting-edge on top of controlling the daily chaos.  Could you
> please
>         clarify the aims of the meeting as well as whether more typical
> core
>         facility directors are encouraged to apply?  From our
> conversations a
>         few weeks ago, when you first discussed the meeting with me, I got
> the
>         impression that the meeting was intended for anybody with a strong
>         interest in networking and finding solutions to common challenges
> for cores.
>
>         Thanks in advance for the clarification!
>         All the best,
>         Alison
>
>         On 10/27/2017 4:11 PM, Chew, Teng-Leong wrote:
>         > *****
>         >
>         > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttp-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy%26d%
> 3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-
> d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DXNp5XQJgl6ctSvL3ICmE0VAbO1mQ
> RyB4Lf3Zt3ezFNA%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=WEoq3iM34hFB8kYxWxRV3w%2BfqqTpftFrHXo9jF7KBnk%3D&
> reserved=0=
>         >
>         > Post images on https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.
> proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.imgur.com%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%
> 3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%
> 3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-
> d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%3DM4mmMSfMul-70ssn26yVQZ9moH_
> OJD7RutmHsBqhadM%26e&data=01%7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%
> 7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112
> fd0d%7C1&sdata=mtls5RndjdCHfKZUDZuWA4L5dJVjEhsPjL5U7cp4cTw%3D&reserved=0=
> and include the link in your posting.
>         >
>         > *****
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Thank you very much for the overwhelming interest to this
> meeting:
>         >
>         > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%
> 3Dhttps-3A__www.janelia.org_you-2Djanelia_conferences_
> frontiers-2Dmicroscopy-2Dtechnologies-2Dand-2Dstrategies-2Dbioimaging-
> 2Dcenters-2Dnetwork%26d%3DDwIGaQ%26c%3DJeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK
> 1YmxXez1G3oNStg%26r%3Dy3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk%26m%
> 3DoavXxPdkIOD_02Y1uWIb-d94fomTTDJoVkzOitn5ibQ%26s%
> 3DQlrIXbaI6uCogvIij3BF1cT0jbuj_TEDTscCqNOAyIg%26e&data=01%
> 7C01%7Ctnf8%40PITT.EDU%7Ce6de35a3d979462ad36308d520144b58%
> 7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=48YtEhmqRJXE%2FnEvy32L5%
> 2BfjRmHWsuCvFw5vdfmSFN8%3D&reserved=0=
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > I quickly browsed through the abstracts we have received and
> based on the questions from a few prospective applicants, I thought I would
> clarify what we would be looking for in these applications.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > We are specifically seeking applicants who could contribute
> something novel to the conference. What I mean by that are the following
> do’s and don’ts:
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Don’ts
>         >
>         > 1.      Don’t submit an abstract that reads like a CV or a core
> facility description. Abstracts that go down a laundry list of “I have 5
> confocals, 3 EMs, and 500 users in a 3000 square feet space” are not going
> to get accepted.
>         >
>         > 2.      If you discuss open access, you cannot simply say “20
> labs from a nearby institution also use my facility”.
>         >
>         > 3.      For data handling, don’t simply say “I have ~200 TB of
> storage space, folks can use it for free or for a fee”.
>         >
>         > 4.      Don’t say my university IT department provides storage
> for a fee (it may be true); nobody cares. Have they built something special
> for you?
>         >
>         > 5.      Do not address all the issues listed on the website in
> one abstract. Pick 1-2 issues that set you apart.
>         >
>         > 6.      Don’t whine about problems you are facing – state the
> challenges you face in the form of opportunity for improvement. Wishing you
> could have more money is not a strategic solution.
>         >
>         > 7.      Do not attempt to re-explain the importance of core
> facilities to your fellow core facility directors.
>         >
>         > Almost everyone in the audience faces these issues, so you are
> not contributing anything new if you say something like the above. If you
> don’t want to hear these same issues for three straight days, don’t submit
> these kinds of abstracts.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Do’s
>         >
>         > 1.      State clearly what makes your core facility unique
> compared to 1,000 other cores worldwide
>         >
>         > 2.      Articulate how you deal with open access challenges –
> biosafety handling, animal transfer, data transfer, lodging, equitable fee
> structure etc
>         >
>         > 3.      State how you deal with big data challenge – how you
> deal with cloud computing and data transfer rate if you offer extensive
> open access
>         >
>         > 4.      State your problems in running the core and how you
> would like these problems solved strategically
>         >
>         > 5.      Describe unique method development (for technical
> abstract)
>         >
>         > 6.      Describe unique algorithm or data analysis strategy (for
> technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 7.      Describe unique probes developed/tested in your core
> (for technical abstract)
>         >
>         > 8.      Describe any unique experience in dealing with
> manufacturers. Demo’ing an instrument is not unique; helping your users get
> to a company demo site is not unique.
>         >
>         > 9.      Describe your unique educational outreach. Running a
> microscopy course to talk about N.A. or confocal is not unique, organizing
> a workshop event sponsored by a bunch of companies is not unique. On the
> other hand, if you run a world-class workshop (accessible to non-local
> attendees) on tissue clearing/expansion microscopy/computer vision or how
> to build a microscope from individual parts, we are more likely to want to
> hear about it.
>         >
>         > 10.    Share your innovative strategy/experience in fundraising
>         >
>         > 11.    Share your creative approach in working with the
> university leadership to help build up your imaging center.
>         >
>         > 12.    Share how your regional institutions have formed a local
> alliance to better serve the community
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > In a nutshell, we look for those who have something unique to
> contribute as we begin to build up an international community of imaging
> centers – for collaboration, data sharing, lobbying for funding, technology
> dissemination. You should show that you have something (expertise or
> experience) unique to contribute to this alliance. Don’t reiterate routine
> efforts that are expected for a decent core facility.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Again, if you have unique experience with any other issues not
> listed, bring it up.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Keep your abstract focused. Don’t discuss too many issues.
> Regular talks are only 15 min each.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Feel free to e-mail me with any question you may have. I am
> happy to work with you. Really looking forward to seeing some familiar
> faces and meeting new colleagues!
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         >
>         > Leong
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>         --
>         Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
>         Research Associate Professor and
>         Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
>         The Rockefeller University,
>         1230 York Avenue,
>         New York,
>         NY 10065.
>         Tel: office     ++ 212 327 7488
>         Tel: lab        ++ 212 327 7486
>         Fax:            ++ 212 327 7489
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Kate Luby-Phelps]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined, manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.

A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of interactions would be worth attending.

Kate Luby-Phelps
Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core Facility
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX

[Craig Brideau]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

I really liked Leong's suggestion of a paper regarding core facility
staffing and maintenance requirements. It would be very helpful to have an
'official best practices' document to refer to when trying to argue for
more resources for a core facility. I think as Kate says, if you put enough
people with various pieces of the puzzle into a room together you should be
able to piece together the whole picture for a technical standards
document/paper.

Craig

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Kate Luby-Phelps <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities
> until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal
> listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’
> brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are
> several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since
> all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps
> identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or
> topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs
> at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners
> and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to
> pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each
> have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the
> process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the
> roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined,
> manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already
> mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to
> replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here
> a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be
> helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium
> for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as
> witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be
> possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I
> have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large
> enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it
> and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises
> all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs,
> shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.
>
> A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of
> interactions would be worth attending.
>
> Kate Luby-Phelps
> Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core Facility
> UT Southwestern Medical Center
> Dallas, TX
>

[Alison J. North]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear Kate,

I think you have raised a number of excellent suggestions here.
Regarding your last one in particular, I feel the need to point out that
we in the USA are WAY behind many other countries in the area of
networking, particularly when it comes to sharing equipment.  I don't
know whether you are familiar with the Euro-BioImaging project:

http://www.eurobioimaging.eu/

but this is a very interesting and laudable attempt to solve exactly the
problem you refer to in accessing uncommon equipment.  Many of the
European countries (also, I believe, Australia) have also established
their own country-wide networks, long before the Euro-BioImaging network
was established.  These matters are discussed every year at the
wonderful ELMI meeting (European Light Microscopy Initiative), which, in
my opinion, is the most useful meeting out there for microscopy facility
managers.  (Also jolly good fun and held in a fantastic location every
year - thank you ELMI meeting organisers past and present!)  Personally,
I would like to see a similar network established in the USA, but the
sheer enormity of this task is rather daunting.  Maybe we could first
approach it on a state or regional level?  This is certainly something
worth discussing.

All the best,
Alison


On 11/1/2017 2:00 PM, Kate Luby-Phelps wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=FURRfkajYc71p3ruAh01np19tBddU9Xv0hQc6C7xzQI&e=
> Post images on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=EQ9Y7WWaHhVJYiO1Yr5US_JJj00ThprUfqWDdkByJ48&e=  and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined, manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.
>
> A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of interactions would be worth attending.
>
> Kate Luby-Phelps
> Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core Facility
> UT Southwestern Medical Center
> Dallas, TX

--
Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
Research Associate Professor and
Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
The Rockefeller University,
1230 York Avenue,
New York,
NY 10065.
Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489

[Roland Nitschke]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

The German BioImaging Network  is one of those Europian national
networks mentioned by Alison.

You can find extensive information about us here:
http://www.germanbioimaging.org

We have published in 2016 an open access paper about: Advanced light
microscopy core facilities: Balancing service, science and career ,
which covers many of the important aspects raised before by others.

You can download the paper at:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.22648/abstract

I am one of the founders and coordinators of this German network and
Elisa Ferrando-May is an invited speaker at the Janelia meeting.

I might also come over to the meeting if I manage to put together an
attractive abstract about the local trinational imaging network 
(https://www.miap.eu)  that I have set-up here in Freiburg.

Thanks Alison also to mention the ELMI meeting, which is clearly a great
place for exchange beetween core facilities in Europe.

All the best

Roland





___________________________

Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg
Microscopy and Image Analysis Platform (MIAP)
Life Imaging Center (LIC) in ZBSA
Dr. Roland Nitschke
Habsburgerstr.49
D-79104 Freiburg
Germany
___________________________
E-mail: [hidden email]
phone: [phone] or 2902
fax: [phone]
https://miap.eu/miap-units/life-imaging-center-lic/

Am 01.11.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Alison North:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Dear Kate,
>
> I think you have raised a number of excellent suggestions here.
> Regarding your last one in particular, I feel the need to point out
> that we in the USA are WAY behind many other countries in the area of
> networking, particularly when it comes to sharing equipment.  I don't
> know whether you are familiar with the Euro-BioImaging project:
>
> http://www.eurobioimaging.eu/
>
> but this is a very interesting and laudable attempt to solve exactly
> the problem you refer to in accessing uncommon equipment. Many of the
> European countries (also, I believe, Australia) have also established
> their own country-wide networks, long before the Euro-BioImaging
> network was established.  These matters are discussed every year at
> the wonderful ELMI meeting (European Light Microscopy Initiative),
> which, in my opinion, is the most useful meeting out there for
> microscopy facility managers.  (Also jolly good fun and held in a
> fantastic location every year - thank you ELMI meeting organisers past
> and present!)  Personally, I would like to see a similar network
> established in the USA, but the sheer enormity of this task is rather
> daunting.  Maybe we could first approach it on a state or regional
> level?  This is certainly something worth discussing.
>
> All the best,
> Alison
>
>
> On 11/1/2017 2:00 PM, Kate Luby-Phelps wrote:
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=FURRfkajYc71p3ruAh01np19tBddU9Xv0hQc6C7xzQI&e= 
>>
>> Post images on
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=EQ9Y7WWaHhVJYiO1Yr5US_JJj00ThprUfqWDdkByJ48&e= 
>> and include the link in your posting.
>> *****
>>
>> I had not really thought much about networking with other core
>> facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me,
>> the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick
>> each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to
>> me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might
>> be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the
>> same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation
>> of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For
>> example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution
>> of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but
>> have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint.
>> If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces
>> of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of
>> eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the
>> roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined,
>> manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As
>> already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is
>> finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting
>> edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to
>> apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a
>> network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources.
>> For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success
>> of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate
>> access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an
>> occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large
>> enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that
>> has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this
>> idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs,
>> travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility
>> is worth discussing.
>>
>> A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of
>> interactions would be worth attending.
>>
>> Kate Luby-Phelps
>> Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core
>> Facility
>> UT Southwestern Medical Center
>> Dallas, TX
>

[Ian Dobbie]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi everyone

In the UK we run and annual light microscopy facility managers meeting which is tremendously useful networking opportunity. It is however explicitly limited to UK based imaging facilities. Meeting people in person is a very different experience from online interaction.


Ian

Sent from my iPhone

On 1 Nov 2017, at 18:00, Kate Luby-Phelps <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined, manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.

A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of interactions would be worth attending.

Kate Luby-Phelps
Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core Facility
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX

[Ann-W]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Kate:


I would echo what Alison says, putting together the UKBioimaging network has been no small task. We're definitely not as well documented as our colleagues in Germany. However the UK funding network has undergone a sea-change in the past decade. Our funders are now looking for value for money in equipment grants, and seeking evidence they would benefit many projects and the resources will have an impact regionally, nationally as well as locally.


While I won't understate the amount of work a dedicated group of us (many of which were also committed ELMI attendees and EuroBioimaging-philes) put in I would say interms of continuation of funding, particularly for our more high cost imaging technologies, of it has been a well worthwhile exercise for us. Furthermore our BioImaging UK facility database, now kindly hosted by the RMS https://www.rms.org.uk/network-collaborate/facilities-database.html has been an invaluable resource. It enables us to quickly and easily identify niche technologies and specific expertise - the list has made our facility agile which has been welcomed.


I often send my staff to other cores to learn and we host visits as well. This is beneficial to all. The German BioImaging have a more formal process for this which certainly has advantages. Since European countries are relatively nearby we've also been to visit colleagues from ELMI as well.


The UK network is staffed by a group of volunteers, we have an annual meeting which is free for facility staff to attend - kindly supported by our industrial partners. We discuss matters which have been raised by others earlier on the thread. Uk Imaging facilities can be very variable - some are large and host several technologies and skilled staff scientists. Others are smaller affairs - depending on research need of the institute. Best practise in the UK would mean meeting and supporting research need and this can look different. But sharing experiences and ideas is invaluable for all.


This sounds like an interesting opportunity for the US!


Best


Ann


Dr Ann Wheeler

Head of IGMM Advanced Imaging Resource

IGMM, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK

________________________________
From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> on behalf of Roland Nitschke <[hidden email]>
Sent: 01 November 2017 18:34:51
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

The German BioImaging Network  is one of those Europian national
networks mentioned by Alison.

You can find extensive information about us here:
http://www.germanbioimaging.org

We have published in 2016 an open access paper about: Advanced light
microscopy core facilities: Balancing service, science and career ,
which covers many of the important aspects raised before by others.

You can download the paper at:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.22648/abstract

I am one of the founders and coordinators of this German network and
Elisa Ferrando-May is an invited speaker at the Janelia meeting.

I might also come over to the meeting if I manage to put together an
attractive abstract about the local trinational imaging network
(https://www.miap.eu)  that I have set-up here in Freiburg.

Thanks Alison also to mention the ELMI meeting, which is clearly a great
place for exchange beetween core facilities in Europe.

All the best

Roland





___________________________

Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg
Microscopy and Image Analysis Platform (MIAP)
Life Imaging Center (LIC) in ZBSA
Dr. Roland Nitschke
Habsburgerstr.49
D-79104 Freiburg
Germany
___________________________
E-mail: [hidden email]
phone: [phone] or 2902
fax: [phone]
https://miap.eu/miap-units/life-imaging-center-lic/

Am 01.11.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Alison North:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Dear Kate,
>
> I think you have raised a number of excellent suggestions here.
> Regarding your last one in particular, I feel the need to point out
> that we in the USA are WAY behind many other countries in the area of
> networking, particularly when it comes to sharing equipment.  I don't
> know whether you are familiar with the Euro-BioImaging project:
>
> http://www.eurobioimaging.eu/
>
> but this is a very interesting and laudable attempt to solve exactly
> the problem you refer to in accessing uncommon equipment. Many of the
> European countries (also, I believe, Australia) have also established
> their own country-wide networks, long before the Euro-BioImaging
> network was established.  These matters are discussed every year at
> the wonderful ELMI meeting (European Light Microscopy Initiative),
> which, in my opinion, is the most useful meeting out there for
> microscopy facility managers.  (Also jolly good fun and held in a
> fantastic location every year - thank you ELMI meeting organisers past
> and present!)  Personally, I would like to see a similar network
> established in the USA, but the sheer enormity of this task is rather
> daunting.  Maybe we could first approach it on a state or regional
> level?  This is certainly something worth discussing.
>
> All the best,
> Alison
>
>
> On 11/1/2017 2:00 PM, Kate Luby-Phelps wrote:
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=FURRfkajYc71p3ruAh01np19tBddU9Xv0hQc6C7xzQI&e=
>>
>> Post images on
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=EQ9Y7WWaHhVJYiO1Yr5US_JJj00ThprUfqWDdkByJ48&e=
>> and include the link in your posting.
>> *****
>>
>> I had not really thought much about networking with other core
>> facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me,
>> the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick
>> each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to
>> me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might
>> be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the
>> same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation
>> of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For
>> example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution
>> of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but
>> have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint.
>> If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces
>> of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of
>> eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the
>> roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined,
>> manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As
>> already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is
>> finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting
>> edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to
>> apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a
>> network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources.
>> For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success
>> of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate
>> access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an
>> occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large
>> enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that
>> has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this
>> idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs,
>> travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility
>> is worth discussing.
>>
>> A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of
>> interactions would be worth attending.
>>
>> Kate Luby-Phelps
>> Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core
>> Facility
>> UT Southwestern Medical Center
>> Dallas, TX
>

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

[Michelle Peckham]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Ian is correct:

See https://www.rms.org.uk/discover-engage/event-calendar/lm-facility-managers-meeting-2018.html

This meeting has been running for over 10 years now, and is really useful.

M

On 01/11/2017, 19:55, "Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Ian Dobbie" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

    *****
    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
    Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
    *****
   
    Hi everyone
   
    In the UK we run and annual light microscopy facility managers meeting which is tremendously useful networking opportunity. It is however explicitly limited to UK based imaging facilities. Meeting people in person is a very different experience from online interaction.
   
   
    Ian
   
    Sent from my iPhone
   
    On 1 Nov 2017, at 18:00, Kate Luby-Phelps <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
   
    *****
    To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
    http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
    Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
    *****
   
    I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined, manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.
   
    A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of interactions would be worth attending.
   
    Kate Luby-Phelps
    Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core Facility
    UT Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, TX
   

[Chew, Teng-Leong]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Kate, Alison, Craig et al.,

Very important point about open access. One such successful "American" example is in the city of Chicago. I remember the challenges we faced while I was still there as we tried to build that network among Northwestern, U of Chicago and University of Illinois-Chicago. But it is done, and now city-wide open access is possible.

As far as alliance at the global level goes, this is why Antje Keppler, John Eriksson and Jason Swedlow are present at this conference. The Global BioImaging project, an extension of the EuroBioimaging network, has been trying to explore ways to extend the alliance to the US. It has already included Japan, Australia and India. But due to the sheer complexity of the situation in the US, the discussion is still in its infancy. I am not sure if it will go anywhere, so this is a good opportunity to take the pulse of the community and see how we think about that. The German/France Bioimaging Consortia are also represented.

BTW, speakers for shared instrumentation grant "writing camp" (not the real name, just cooking this up while I am on the road) have been identified, we will absolutely talk about this topic. There are several rather successful awardees and many who are on the review panel. So there would be plenty of exchange of experience. I also remind myself that some European instrumentation grants allow the applicants to include personnel salary: something the US/Canadian systems simply do not entertain. So it would be important to understand the strategy from that angle and how the US community should lobby for that change of attitude.

I can only dream beyond dreams that this conference will be run as smoothly as ELMI. We are learning from all the hiccups; but as they say, it has to start somewhere, right?

Regards,
Leong

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alison North
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:13 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear Kate,

I think you have raised a number of excellent suggestions here.
Regarding your last one in particular, I feel the need to point out that we in the USA are WAY behind many other countries in the area of networking, particularly when it comes to sharing equipment.  I don't know whether you are familiar with the Euro-BioImaging project:

http://www.eurobioimaging.eu/

but this is a very interesting and laudable attempt to solve exactly the problem you refer to in accessing uncommon equipment.  Many of the European countries (also, I believe, Australia) have also established their own country-wide networks, long before the Euro-BioImaging network was established.  These matters are discussed every year at the wonderful ELMI meeting (European Light Microscopy Initiative), which, in my opinion, is the most useful meeting out there for microscopy facility managers.  (Also jolly good fun and held in a fantastic location every year - thank you ELMI meeting organisers past and present!)  Personally, I would like to see a similar network established in the USA, but the sheer enormity of this task is rather daunting.  Maybe we could first approach it on a state or regional level?  This is certainly something worth discussing.

All the best,
Alison


On 11/1/2017 2:00 PM, Kate Luby-Phelps wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.umn.edu_cgi-
> 2Dbin_wa-3FA0-3Dconfocalmicroscopy&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoW
> YibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4
> i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=FURRfkajYc71p3ruAh01np19tB
> ddU9Xv0hQc6C7xzQI&e= Post images on
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.imgur.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=y3Gg5KwygGNfgoACnrKLvtQcoFinbJ43lW3fx-6okTk&m=E4i8HsilKoimSALTZ1UgskIXVL1QntXVMrJIhE7Dpdc&s=EQ9Y7WWaHhVJYiO1Yr5US_JJj00ThprUfqWDdkByJ48&e=  and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined, manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.
>
> A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of interactions would be worth attending.
>
> Kate Luby-Phelps
> Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core
> Facility UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX

--
Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
Research Associate Professor and
Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center, The Rockefeller University,
1230 York Avenue,
New York,
NY 10065.
Tel: office ++ 212 327 7488
Tel: lab     ++ 212 327 7486
Fax:         ++ 212 327 7489

[mcammer]

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

What about ABRF https://abrf.org/ ?

Michael Cammer, Research Scientist, DART Microscopy Laboratory
NYU Langone Health, 540 First Avenue, SK2 Microscopy Suite, New York, NY  10016
C: 914-309-3270  [hidden email]    http://microscopynotes.com/ 
https://med.nyu.edu/research/research-resources/scientific-cores-shared-resources/microscopy-laboratory



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Kate Luby-Phelps
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 2:01 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Janelia conference for imaging cores - some pointers


I had not really thought much about networking with other core facilities until I saw the announcement of the conference. For me, the confocal listserv essentially fills this niche as we get to pick each others’ brains. However, in thinking about it more, it seems to me there are several ways in which a formal networking effort might be helpful: 1) Since all cores large and small will share some of the same challenges, perhaps identification of these areas and formation of focused subnetworks or topical working groups could be useful. For example, I have made some stabs at solving the need for deconvolution of large volumes from slide scanners and tiled confocal z stacks but have not had the time or the resources to pursue this to an endpoint. If others are in the same boat, perhaps we each have different pieces of the puzzle and sharing them could speed up the process of eliminating what doesn’t work or at least defining what the roadblocks are and then having group members take on well-defined, manageable tasks to try to move things forward for everyone. As already mentioned, another example of a challenge we all face is finding money to replace aging instrumentation and to acquire cutting edge technology. Here a network for mentoring people who want to apply for S10 grants could be helpful. A third possibility is a network that could serve as a consortium for sharing of resources. For software, this is not too difficult, as witnessed by the success of ImageJ/FiJi and CellProfiler. Would it be possible to facilitate access to instrumentation as well? For example, if I have an occasional need for STED but do not own one and do not have a large enough user group to apply for an S10, can I locate a facility that has it and somehow arrange to have my sample viewed? I realize this idea raises all kinds of logistical issues, including recharge costs, travel costs, shipping of samples, etc., but perhaps its feasibility is worth discussing.

A conference that attempts to promote and formalize these types of interactions would be worth attending.

Kate Luby-Phelps
Director, Live Cell Imaging Facility and Electron Microscopy Core Facility UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX

------------------------------------------------------------
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by return email and delete the original message. Please note, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The organization accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
=================================